BioComp Implants in Anaplastology - Pilot Study
Safe and Easy Application of BioComp Implants for Prosthetic Reconstruction of Craniofacial Defects
At the department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) the routine procedure after ablation of the nose, ear or eye is reconstruction with an episthesis. Retention can be achieved using adhesives, undercuts or bone implants. Implant based episthesis are now commonly used because of the good retention and episthesis stability. This results in a better patient quality of life.
Today we use machined surface implants in the craniofacial region of different brands. Each system has its own instruments and application method. To enhance the clinical usability, we are searching for one system for all extra-oral implant regions.
Furthermore, implant patients may be compromised by aging, diseases, smoking, medication and radiation therapy, which can affect the bone healing process. In these cases, implants are known to have higher failure rates compared to the application in healthy cases. Therefore implants with biomechanical surface modifications, such as the HAVD implants of BioComp, may have a positive effect on osseointegration, resulting in higher success rates in the compromised patient.
The aim of this pilot study is to collect information about the functionality and safety of a surface treated implant system (HAVD, BioComp) for episthetic reconstruction after ablative surgery in the nasal, orbital and auricular region for a potential future RCT.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Veronique CM Timmer, Msc
- Phone Number: +31433872010
- Email: v.timmer@mumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Lucas J Poort, Drs
- Phone Number: +31433872010
- Email: l.poort@mumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
Limburg
-
Maastricht, Limburg, Netherlands, 6229HX
- Recruiting
- MaastrichtUMC
-
Contact:
- Peter Kessler, MD PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- In need of an auricular, nasal or orbital episthesis
- Be able to maintain a good personal hygiene
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications for general anesthesia
- DEmentia or other psychiatric disorders/ unable to maintain a good personal hygiene
- Poor personal hygiene
- Pregnancy
- Acute infection
- Immunosuppression
- Compromised by medication
- Local irradiation >50Gray
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HAVD implant
|
hydroxy-apatite coated, acid etched implant for extra oral use to reconstruct craniofacial defects with an episthesis
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Changes in implant stability as measured by the Osstell implant stability meter at one year
Time Frame: one year
|
one year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
redness/irritation of the skin
Time Frame: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
|
redness/irritation of the skin
Time Frame: 12 weeks after implant placement
|
12 weeks after implant placement
|
|
|
redness/irritation of the skin
Time Frame: 26 weeks after implant placement
|
26 weeks after implant placement
|
|
|
redness/irritation of the skin
Time Frame: 52 weeks after implant placement
|
52 weeks after implant placement
|
|
|
Implant survival
Time Frame: 52 weeks after implant placement
|
52 weeks after implant placement
|
|
|
Clinical ease of use
Time Frame: Directly after implant placement (0)
|
Opinion of the surgeon about the easiness of use of the implant system, scored by a questionnaire.
|
Directly after implant placement (0)
|
|
Patient satisfaction as measured by a VAS scoring system
Time Frame: 26 weeks after implant placement
|
Patient satisfaction scored by a self made questionnaire
|
26 weeks after implant placement
|
|
Patient satisfaction as measured by a VAS scoring system
Time Frame: 52 weeks after implant placement
|
Patient satisfaction scored by a self made questionnaire
|
52 weeks after implant placement
|
|
Quality of life a measured by a VAS scoring system
Time Frame: 52 weeks after implant placement
|
Quality of life scored by a self made questionnaire
|
52 weeks after implant placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter AW Kessler, Prof. Dr., Maastricht University Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- METC142065
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Prostheses and Implants
-
NCT02793726Completed
-
NCT06275282RecruitingAmputation | Prostheses and Implants
-
NCT03182361CompletedProstheses and Implants | Maxillofacial Prosthesis Implantation | Extra-oral Implants | Extra-oral Prosthesis
-
NCT01729858Active, not recruitingPartial Edentulism | Dental Prosthesis Failure | Disorder of Prostheses and Implants
-
NCT03772236UnknownAnkle Osteoarthritis | Prostheses and Implants
-
NCT04565639CompletedOrthoses | Prostheses
-
NCT06948695RecruitingHealthy Volunteers | Prostheses | Amputee
-
NCT06871020CompletedMandibular Distal-extension Prostheses
Clinical Trials on HAVD-implant
-
NCT05500755Recruiting
-
NCT00876707CompletedCataract | Astigmatism
-
NCT00981266WithdrawnAugmentation | Augmentation Revision | General Breast Enlargement | Post-lactational Involution | Asymmetry
-
NCT00726063CompletedPartial Edentulism | Tooth Disease
-
NCT00858052Completed
-
NCT05108324Not yet recruitingEdentulous; Alveolar Process, Atrophy
-
NCT05940662SuspendedComplications | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | Cost-Benefit Analysis | Cost-effectiveness | Esthetic Zone | Single Tooth Dental Implant | Single Tooth Lost | Accuracy of Dental Implants | Dimensional Changes | Implant Survival and Success
-
NCT06274476CompletedAtrophic Maxillary Ridge and Mandibular Ridge