Innovative Public-private Partnership to Target Subsidized Antimalarials in the Retail Sector (Aim 2)

October 8, 2019 updated by: Duke University

Innovative Partnership to Target Antimalarial Subsidies in the Retail Sector

The overall objective of this study is to evaluate the public health impact of targeted antimalarials subsidies through scale-up by determining the community-wide effects of targeting an antimalarial subsidy through a partnership between Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) and the private retail sector. The primary hypothesis to be tested is that offering a fixed-price voucher that reduces the cost for artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) purchase in the retail sector conditional on a positive malaria test (targeted subsidy) can improve uptake of testing for malaria and will increase the proportion of fevers tested for malaria before treatment. The study will be carried out in two sub-counties in Kenya with similar malaria burden but different access to health services; the investigators will use a cluster-randomized design to assign community units (CUs) in each sub-county to either an intervention or control arm. CHVs will be trained to use malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) to diagnose malaria in household members with documented or reported fever; households in intervention CUs will be informed of the intervention and encouraged to contact the CHV for any febrile illness in the home. There are minimal risks associated with receiving an RDT. Households with a positive RDT will be given a serialized voucher that will entitle the holder to purchase a quality assured ACT in the retail sector at a reduced, fixed price. The primary and secondary outcome measures will be compared at baseline and 12 months post-baseline through population-based surveying. The primary aim is to determine whether there is significant difference between the 2 study arms in the proportion of clients with fever who are tested prior to any treatment after adjusting for relevant covariates.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40340

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
      • Eldoret, Kenya
        • Moi University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Intervention participation criteria:

  • Client is older than 1 year
  • Client has fever or history of fever or feeling unwell with a malaria-like illness within the last 2 days
  • Client or their parent/legal guardian (if under 18) consents to participate

Cross sectional survey participation criteria:

  • Household representative in the intervention or control arm
  • At least one member in the respondent's household with a history of fever or feeling unwell with a malaria like illness within the last four weeks
  • Respondent is older than 18 years

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Intervention exclusion criteria:

  • Client has signs of severe disease or other problem requiring immediate referral to a health facility
  • Client has already visited a health facility, taken or purchased antimalarials for the current illness.

Cross sectional survey exclusion criteria:

• Households not in the intervention or control arms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Malaria RDT & conditional voucher
In the intervention arm, trained community health volunteers (CHVs) will offer eligible household members a free malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) and a voucher allowing the purchase of a qualified artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector conditional on a positive test.
Behavioral: Malaria RDT & conditional voucher for ACT from retail sector
Trained community health volunteers will offer eligible household members free malaria rapid diagnostic tests and a voucher allowing the purchase of a qualified ACT at a reduced fixed price in the retail sector conditional on a positive test
No Intervention: Comparison Arm
Individuals in the comparison arm will only receive standard community health volunteer (CHV) visits.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With a Fever Who Receive a Malaria Test From Any Source
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Using ACT Who Had a Positive Test
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Number of Participants Using an ACT Who Did Not Have a Test
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Number of Subjects Who Received a Correct Dose of AL (Artemether Lumefantrine)
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Denominator is all those who took AL. Artemether lumefantrine is one type of ACT.
6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Number of Subjects With Fever That Received Correct Treatment
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
The number of people with fever that report receiving correct treatment with regards to malaria (i.e., received an RDT test and took ACTs if the result was positive, or did not take ACTs if the test result was negative).
6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Moi University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wendy O'Meara, PhD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 26, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 8, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00063384
  • 5R01AI110478 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings