Autologous Muscle Derived Cells for Underactive Bladder

December 20, 2021 updated by: Jason Gilleran
This is a prospective, open-label, Phase 1, single center study evaluating the safety and efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells as a treatment for chronic Underactive Bladder.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subject that meet inclusion and exclusion criteria will be consented and enrolled in this study. Initial screening includes blood and urine testing, questionnaires, physical examination, specialized bladder function testing and review of medical history. At the next visit a small sample of each subject's own thigh muscle is obtained by needle biopsy. This cell biopsy is sent to a specialized lab for growth and processing. Approximately ten weeks later the frozen cells will be sent back to the treatment site for thawing, diluting and injection under lighted instrumentation into the subject's bladder wall. The subject will be followed for 6 months and at that time may be eligible for a second injection of cells. The study doctor will determine if the second injection may be beneficial to the subject. All subjects will be followed for up to 12 months. The follow-up assessments at 12 months will include questionnaires, urine and blood testing, specialized bladder function testing and visualizing the inside of the bladder with a lighted instrument.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
23

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • Beaumont Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Males and females, at least 18 years of age
  2. History of Underactive Bladder (UAB) for at least 6 months documented in the medical record
  3. Recurring UAB symptoms
  4. Subjects unresponsive to relief symptoms of UAB with previous use of medications and/or other treatments
  5. Voiding difficulty (complains of difficulty emptying the bladder)
  6. Post void residual greater than or equal to 150 mL
  7. Total UAB Questionnaire Score greater than or equal to 3
  8. Females of child-bearing potential agree to use a reliable form of birth control for the entire study duration
  9. Willing and capable of understanding and complying with all requirements of the protocol, including proper completion of the voiding diaries and self-administered questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant, plans to become pregnant or lactating
  2. History of bleeding diathesis, uncorrectable coagulopathy, or would refuse a blood transfusion
  3. Currently on anticoagulant therapy
  4. Obvious neurological impairment
  5. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to bovine proteins or allergens, gentamicin sulfate, ampicillin, and/or lidocaine that medically warrants exclusion as determined by the physician
  6. Simultaneously participating in another investigational drug or device study or use of any investigational drug(s) or therapeutic device(s) within 3 months preceding enrollment
  7. Has been treated with an investigational device, drug, or procedure for UAB within the last 6 months.
  8. Medical condition or disorder that may limit life expectancy or that may cause protocol deviations (e.g. unable to perform self-evaluations and/or accurately report medical history, urinary symptoms, and/or data)
  9. History of cancer in pelvic organs, ureters, or kidneys or any cancer that has undergone treatment within the past 12 months
  10. Compromised immune system due to disease state, chronic corticosteroid use, or other immunosuppressive therapy
  11. History of radiation therapy to the bladder
  12. Tests positive for Hepatitis B (Hepatitis B Surface Antigen), and Anti-Hepatitis B Core Total Antibody, Hepatitis C (Anti-Hepatitis C virus enzyme immunoassay, Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV Type I and 2 Antibodies), and/or Syphilis
  13. Abnormal renal function
  14. An active urinary tract infection as evidenced by positive urine culture
  15. Taking medication(s) that affect urination (e.g. medically necessary, stable drugs) such as prescription drugs, over-the-counter drugs, or dietary supplements, including herbal supplements and those taken with teas
  16. Requires concomitant use of or treatment with immunosuppressive agents
  17. Pelvic organ prolapse beyond the introitus (e.g., cystocele, rectocele)
  18. Abnormal bladder capacity (i.e., less than 100 mL)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Autologous Muscle Derived Cells
Autologous Muscle Derived Cells are obtained by needle biopsy from the subject's own thigh muscle. These cells are sent to a special lab for growth and processing. When ready the cells are sent to the treatment location for injection into the bladder wall.
Biological: Autologous Muscle Derived Cells
A small sample of the subject's own thigh muscle is obtained by needle biopsy. The biopsy sample is sent to Cook Myosite, Inc. for growth and processing. When the sample cell dosage is achieved the cells are frozen and sent back to the treatment site. The cells are thawed, diluted and injected under lighted instrumentation and visualization into about 30 sites in the bladder wall.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Study-related Adverse Events at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
Safety of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by occurrences of study-related adverse events (AEs) reported by 6 months after enrollment. Number of reports of each adverse event is listed for events determined to be definitely or possibly related to study activities.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Study-related Adverse Events Between 6 and 12 Months
Time Frame: Between 6 and 12 months
Long term safety of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by occurrences of study-related adverse events (AEs) reported between 6 and 12 months after enrollment. Number of reports of each adverse event is listed for events determined to be definitely or possibly related to study activities.
Between 6 and 12 months
Number of Participants With Improvement in Underactive Bladder Symptoms at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject completed GRA questionnaire. The GRA measures the subjects perceived level of change in underactive bladder symptoms at 12 months compared to before they were treated. The scale ranges from: Markedly worse, Moderately worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly improved, Moderately improved, to Markedly improved. Subjects select one response.
12 months
Number of Participants With Improvement in Underactive Bladder Symptoms at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported degree of change in urinary symptoms on the PGI-I at 12 months, compared to how their symptoms were before they began the study. Subjects select one response. The response scale ranges from: Very much better, Much better, A little bit better, No change, A little worse, Much worse, Very Much worse.
12 months
Change in Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) Long Form Score From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported urinary symptoms at 12 months from baseline. The ICIQ has a separate female (ICIQ-FLUTS Long form) and male (ICIQ-MLUTS long Form) set of questions to assess urinary symptoms in each sex. The total score range for ICIQ-FLUTS is 0-69. The total score range for ICIQ-MLUTS is 0-84. The sum of all the question scores equal a total score. Each question has a degree of bother scale associated with it. The degree of bother ranges from 0 (none at all) to 10 ( a great deal). Degree of bother scores are not incorporated in the overall score but indicate impact of the individual symptom. The difference taken in this analysis is the difference between the total score at 12 months minus the total score at baseline. If the difference is negative, it indicates improvement in the symptoms; 0 is no change; and a positive difference indicates a worsening of the symptoms.
12 months
Change in Underactive Bladder Questionnaire (UABQ) Score From Baseline at 12 Months
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by subject reported changes to urinary symptoms at 12 months from baseline on the UABQ. The UABQ is a set of questions to assess urinary symptoms associated with underactive bladder. The total score ranges between 0 to 16. A lower score indicates a better outcome. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months
The Change in Number of Independent Voiding Occurrences Per Day on the 3-day Bladder Diary From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported number of independent daytime voiding occurrences per day on the 3-day diary at 12 months compared to baseline. Positive numbers reflect a larger number of independent voids per day reported at baseline, and negative number represent a larger number of independent voids per day reported at 12 months.
12 months
The Change in the Number of Voiding Occurrences Per Day Using a Catheter Recorded on the 3-day Bladder Diary From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported number of daytime voiding occurrences per day using a catheter on the 3-day diary at 12 months compared to baseline. Positive numbers reflect a larger number of voiding occurrences per day reported at baseline, and negative numbers represent a larger number of voiding occurrences per day reported at 12 months.
12 months
The Change in the Average Volume Voided Independently Per Day Measured in Milliliters Over the 3 Day Period Recorded on the 3-day Bladder Diary From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported average volume voided independently per day over the 3 day period on the 3-day diary at 12 months compared to baseline. Volumes are measured in milliliters. Positive numbers reflect a larger volume voided per day at baseline, and negative numbers represent a larger volume voided per day at 12 months.
12 months
The Change in the Average Volume in Milliliters Voided Per Day Using a Catheter Per Day Over the 3 Day Period Recorded on the 3-day Bladder Diary From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported average volume voided using a catheter per day over the 3 day period on the 3-day diary at 12 months compared to baseline. Volumes are measured in milliliters. Positive numbers reflect a larger volume voided per day at baseline, and negative numbers represent a larger volume voided per day at 12 months.
12 months
The Change in the Number of Bladder Leaks Over the 3 Day Period Recorded on the 3-day Bladder Diary From Baseline at 12 Months.
Time Frame: 12 months
The efficacy of Autologous Muscle Derived Cells in the treatment of underactive bladder as measured by changes to subject reported number of bladder leaks over the 3 day period on the 3-day diary at 12 months compared to baseline. Positive numbers reflect a larger number of leaks reported at baseline, and negative numbers represent a larger number of leaks reported at 12 months.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Jason Gilleran

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jason Gilleran, MD, Beaumont Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 3, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 4, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 20, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-134

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence

Clinical Trials on Autologous Muscle Derived Cells

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings