Dietary Sodium Intake and Outcomes in Heart Failure (PROHIBITSodium)

September 23, 2019 updated by: Javed Butler, Stony Brook University

Rationale and Design of the PRevent Adverse Outcomes in Heart faIlure By limITing Sodium Study

Currently, the recommendations for sodium intake restriction for patients with heart failure are mostly based on expert consensus and observational evidence, whereas smaller randomized studies have actually suggested that strict dietary sodium reduction may be harmful in heart failure. In the present clinical trial pilot study, the investigators plan to collect data on enrollment rates, compliance, outcomes, and safety of a 12-week dietary intervention in heart failure patients, with prepared food containing two different levels of sodium (1,500 mg and 3,000 mg) daily, followed by a 12-week surveillance for safety and effectiveness. The goal is to inform the design of a fullscale clinical trial that will provide more definitive evidence for dietary sodium recommendations in heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Despite the intense research for improving outcomes in heart failure, evidence remains scarce (and mostly observational) for dietary sodium restriction, arguably the most widely recommended self-care measure for heart failure. In explicit acknowledgement of the evidence gaps and unclear benefits, the recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines have not assigned a level of evidence to sodium intake recommendations and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines do not provide a specific target level of sodium intake for patients with HF.

Although it seems reasonable to restrict sodium below <3000 mg/d in heart failure, it is currently unknown how "low" is appropriate for these patients.

This study will attempt to provide the basis to evaluate the above guidelines by determining, in consecutive HFrEF patients with EF ≤40% during an acute HF admission, the proportion of patients who: (1) are willing to participate in a 12-week feeding trial; (2) meet the trial eligibility criteria; and (C) subsequently continue to consume ≥3000 mg/d sodium 15-30 days post discharge despite discharge instructions. This will allow the investigators to estimate enrollment rates in a full-scale trial.

This study will randomize 50 eligible patients to prepared meal plans with either 1500 mg/d vs. 3000 mg/d sodium for 12 weeks .

The hypotheses of the present study are that (1) ≥ 90% of patients will be retained on the study by 12 weeks (or at first outcome or safety event) and (2) patients will be compliant with provided food ≥ 90% of the study days.

Study Primary Endpoints:

(i) Overall on-study retention and (ii) compliance with the prepared food, assessed via daily food diaries and 24-h urine collections at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks.

Study Secondary Endpoints:

Estimate trends in (1) all-cause mortality, readmissions, and emergency room visits; (2) NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels; and (3) diet palatability and quality of life, between the two arms.

Safety endpoints:

Safety of the intervention assessed by vital sign and laboratory assessments. This pilot study is expected to yield critical information necessary and sufficient to design a full-scale clinical trial that will provide evidence for dietary sodium recommendations in heart failure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
27

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Stony Brook, New York, United States, 11794
        • Stony Brook University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥21 years at screening
  2. Recent (≤1 year) EF ≤40%
  3. Standard HF treatment, including ACEI/ARB & beta-blockers & aldosterone antagonists, unless contraindicated or intolerant

5. Able to consume research diet (e.g. no dysphagia etc.) 6. Systolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg 7. >3000 mg/d sodium excretion (by 24-hr urinary sodium)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Institutionalized patients
  2. Siogns or symptoms of instability in HF status
  3. Communication barriers, including cognitive impairment; inability to communicate and understand and cooperate with the protocol
  4. Severe non-cardiac illness that compromises life expectancy within the next 12 months or the ability to participate in the study (e.g. severe hepatobiliary disease, cancer underground chemo- or radiotherapy)
  5. Any medical or surgical procedure planned in the next 6 months
  6. Participants planning to move to a different state within 6 months
  7. Participation in any other experimental protocol
  8. Renal replacement therapy or Stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: A: 1.5 gr of Sodium
Meal Plans with 1.5 gr of Sodium
Other: Dietary plan with controlled amount of Sodium
Dietary plan with 1.5 gr vs 3 gr of Sodium
Active Comparator: B: 3 gr of Sodium
Meal Plans with 3 gr of Sodium
Other: Dietary plan with controlled amount of Sodium
Dietary plan with 1.5 gr vs 3 gr of Sodium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient On-Study Retention
Time Frame: 3 month meal plan
Percentage of patients retained in the study
3 month meal plan

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All cause mortality
Time Frame: 6 months follow up period
Percentage of patients died
6 months follow up period
Rehospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months follow up period
Percentage of patients rehospitalized
6 months follow up period
Emergency room visits
Time Frame: 6 months follow up period
Percentage of patients visited emergency room
6 months follow up period
NT-proBNP
Time Frame: 6months follow up period
Concentration in pg/ml
6months follow up period
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months follow up period

The 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) measures health status in patients with heart failure (HF),

KCCQ has 6 domains and 2 summary scores:

Symptom Domain: frequency and burden of symptoms. Physical Function Domain: limitations. Quality of Life (QoL) Domain: reflects QoL Social Limitation Domain: ability to interact in social activities. Self-efficacy Domain: patients' perceptions of how to prevent HF exacerbations. Symptom Stability Domain: recent changes in symptoms. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and QoL scores.

The KCCQ is scored by assigning each response an ordinal value, beginning with 1. Scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 range by subtracting the lowest possible scale score, dividing by the range of the scale and multiplying by 100. Best is 100.
6 months follow up period
Food Palatability Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6 months follow up period
Likert Scales for appearance, taste, and quantity of food (from 1 to 5 - 5 being the most acceptable)
6 months follow up period

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
'mmHg'
6 month follow up
Creatinine
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
'mg/dl'
6 month follow up
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
'mg/dl'
6 month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stony Brook University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Javed Butler, MD, MPH, MBA, Stony Brook University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R34HL119773 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 639316 (Other Identifier: Stony Brook CORIHS A)
  • R34HL119773 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on Dietary plan with controlled amount of Sodium

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings