An in Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Deciduous Carious Dentin
A Randomized in Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Deciduous Carious Dentin
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Inclusion criteria consisted of good general health, without syndromes or chronic systemic diseases. They should also have at least one primary molar with deep carious lesion (2/3 of dentin) without pain symptomatology and compatible with reversible pulpits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children whose parents refused to sign the informed consent document, who did not cooperate with the clinical exams, whose teeth had the treatment choice changed (pain or evolution to irreversible pulpits), who did not attend to the appointments for the scheduled treatments, or who needed antibiotics treatment for other medical reasons were excluded from the study without prejudice.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Control
|
Tooth was isolated using a rubber dam isolation in order to collect the dentin samples
The tooth was dried with air jet.
Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentinal curette and collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed.
The remaining dentin was washed with chlorhexidine 2%.
After that a a new dentin collection was performed at another site of the cavity, and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement was placed.
|
|
Experimental: APDT 1
|
Tooth was isolated using a rubber dam isolation in order to collect the dentin samples
The tooth was dried with air jet.
Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentine curette and collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed.
The remaining dentin was washed with 200 µL of O-Toluidine blue dye (0.1 mg/mL) for 60 s.
After this, a red LED light source with wavelength of 630 nm was used at 100 mW power, 9.0 J of energy, for 60 s with energy density of 30.0 J/cm2 .
A new dentin collection was performed after this treatment at another site of the cavity and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement Vitremer was placed.
|
|
Experimental: APDT 2
|
Tooth was isolated using a rubber dam isolation in order to collect the dentin samples
The tooth was dried with air jet.
Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentine curette and initial collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed.
Treatment of the remaining dentin was performed with 200 µL of methylene blue dye 0.01% for 5 min and after this, a red low level LASER light source with wavelength of 660 nm was used at 100 mW power, 9.0 J of energy, for 90 s with energy density of 320.0 J/cm2 .
A new dentin collection was performed after this treatment at another site of the cavity and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement was placed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quantification of Bacteria by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)
Time Frame: 15 days after dentin collection
|
Quantification of S. mutans, L. casei, F. nucleatum, A. rimae and total bacteria by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)
|
15 days after dentin collection
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tooth Pain
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Patients reported the presence or absence of tooth pain after 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Tooth Pain
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Patients reported the presence or absence of tooth pain after 6 months
|
12 months
|
|
Restoration Quality
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The quality of restoration was evaluated through the absence of radiographic radiolucent area after 6 months
|
6 months
|
|
Restoration Quality
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The quality of restoration was evaluated through the absence of radiographic radiolucent area after 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 150/10
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.