Effect of Cobicistat Versus Ritonavir Boosting on the Brain Permeation of Darunavir in HIV-infected Individuals

February 1, 2017 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
The purpose of this study is to assess whether a boosting by cobicistat results in similar concentrations of darunavir in the brain compared to a boosting by ritonavir.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Cobicistat is a new pharmacokinetic enhancer or booster of the HIV protease inhibitor darunavir. Cobicistat is distinct from the conventional booster ritonavir in that cobicistat presents a more selective inhibition of the enzymes metabolizing drugs. In addition, cobicistat is a weaker inhibitor of the efflux drug transporters expressed at the level of the blood-brain barrier (i.e. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance Protein (BCRP)). A weaker inhibition of these efflux transporters could possibly result in less darunavir entering the brain when boosted by cobicistat as compared to a boosting by ritonavir. Such a difference could potentially be critical in patients with HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders as sufficient drug levels are needed to efficiently inhibit HIV replication inside the brain.

The aim of this study is to determine whether the boosting of darunavir by cobicistat results effectively in lower darunavir concentrations in the CSF as compared to a boosting by ritonavir. The study will be performed in HIV infected patients presenting HIV associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and requiring a lumbar puncture for clinical reasons. In addition, the patients will be only eligible if the are treated or if they qualify for a darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg once daily) containing regimen. Darunavir concentrations will be measured simultaneously in the CSF and plasma (CSF/plasma ratio) first with the ritonavir boosting and subsequently with the cobicistat boosting.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4031
        • Division of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • documented HIV infection
  • presence of HIV associated neurocognitive disorders requiring a lumbar puncture for clinical reasons
  • treatment or qualifying to be treated with a HIV therapy including darunavir/r (800/100 mg once daily)
  • ability to comply with the study requirements
  • informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • conditions which disrupt the blood-brain barrier and thereby impact the entry of drugs in the brain (meningitis, meningoencephalitis, multiple sclerosis, progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy)
  • co-medications inhibiting/inducing P-glycoprotein and BCRP
  • co-medications inhibiting/inducing cytochrome P450 isoenzyme 3A4 (CYP3A4)
  • non adherence to Treatment
  • pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: darunavir/ritonavir vs cobicistat
All HIV infected patients will be treated with a darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg) once daily containing regimen. Darunavir/ritonavir concentrations will be measured simultaneously in CSF and plasma after 1 month of treatment. The treatment will be switched to darunavir/cobicistat (800/150 mg) once daily and darunavir/cobicistat levels will be measured in CSF and plasma after 1 month of treatment.
Drug: Darunavir
darunavir 800 mg once daily will be first given together with ritonavir 100 mg once daily for one month (period 1) and then darunavir 800 mg once daily will be given together with cobicistat 150 mg once daily for one month (period 2). Afterwards, all patients will be switched back to darunavir/ritonavir (800/100 mg once daily).
Other Names:
  • Prezista
Drug: ritonavir
ritonavir 100 mg once daily will be used to boost darunavir 800 mg once daily (period 1).
Other Names:
  • Norvir
Drug: cobicistat
cobicistat 150 mg once daily will be used to boost darunavir 800 mg once daily (period 2).
Other Names:
  • Tybost

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebrospinal fluid/plasma concentrations (ng/ml) of darunavir/ritonavir versus darunavir/cobicistat
Time Frame: 1 month
darunavir concentrations (ng/ml) in the cerebrospinal fluid when coadministered with ritonavir versus cobicistat relative to the corresponding concentrations of darunavir in the plasma
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebrospinal fluid concentrations (ng/ml) of darunavir/ritonavir versus darunavir/cobicistat relative to the concentration of darunavir (ng/ml) inhibiting 50% (IC50) or 90% (IC90) of the viral replication
Time Frame: 1 month
darunavir concentrations (ng/ml) in the cerebrospinal fluid when coadministered with ritonavir versus cobicistat relative to darunavir concentrations (ng/ml) suppressing HIV replication by 50% and 90% (IC50 and IC90)
1 month
Proportion of responders (HIV RNA < 50 copies/ml in CSF) for darunavir/ritonavir versus darunavir/cobicistat
Time Frame: 1 month
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Manuel Battegay, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 9, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 21, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 2, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 1, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DRVCOBI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings