Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Non-statin Lipid Modifying Therapy or the Lowest Strength of Statin (ODYSSEY-NIPPON)

January 3, 2019 updated by: Sanofi

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Non-statin Lipid Modifying Therapy or the Lowest Strength of Statin

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by alirocumab administration as add-on therapy to non-statin lipid modifying therapy (LMT) including diet therapy alone or the lowest strength of statin in comparison with placebo after 12 weeks of treatment in participants with hypercholesterolemia.

Secondary Objective:

  • To evaluate the effect of two treatment regimens of alirocumab on other lipid parameters: apolipoprotein B (Apo-B), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG), and apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1).
  • To evaluate the safety and tolerability of alirocumab administration.
  • To evaluate the development of anti-alirocumab antibodies.
  • To evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of alirocumab administration.
  • To evaluate the long-term safety in participants receiving open-label alirocumab administration.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The duration of study per participant was approximately 71 weeks consisting of a run-in period (4 weeks), a screening period (3 weeks), a double-blind treatment period (12 weeks), and an open-label treatment period (52 weeks).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ageo-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392028
      • Chuo-Ku, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392007
      • Chuo-Ku, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392029
      • Fukui-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392014
      • Hachioji-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392023
      • Itoshima-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392013
      • Kanazawa-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392010
      • Kasuga-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392024
      • Kawanishi-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392004
      • Kitakyushu-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392015
      • Komatsu-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392005
      • Matsudo-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392032
      • Matsumoto-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392017
      • Mito-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392003
      • Morioka-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392018
      • Moriya-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392009
      • Nagoya-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392025
      • Nagoya-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392006
      • Nagoya-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392011
      • Nagoya-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392019
      • Osaka-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392027
      • Sakura-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392030
      • Shinagawa-Ku, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392016
      • Shinjuku-Ku, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392001
      • Shinjuku-Ku, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392008
      • Shizuoka-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392012
      • Suita-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392002
      • Suita-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392031
      • Toyonaka-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392020
      • Yao-Shi, Japan
        • Investigational Site Number 392022

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria :

Participants with hypercholesterolemia (heFH or non-FH) receiving non statin LMTs or the lowest strength of statin.

Exclusion criteria:

  • LDL-C <100 mg/dL (<2.59 mmol/L) at the screening visit (Week -3) in participants with heFH or in participants with non-FH who have a history of documented coronary heart disease.
  • LDL-C <120 mg/dL (<3.10 mmol/L) at the screening visit (Week -3) in participants with non-FH participants who had a history of documented diseases or other risk factors classified as primary prevention category III as defined in JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
  • Not on a stable dose of LMT (including diet therapy alone) in the run-in period or the screening period.
  • Fasting serum TGs >400 mg/dL (>4.52 mmol/L) at the screening period.
  • Systolic blood pressure (BP) >160 mmHg or diastolic BP >100 mmHg at the run-in visit (Week -7) or the screening visit (Week -3) or the randomization visit (Week 0).

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Alirocumab 150 mg Q4W
Double-blind treatment period(DBTP):participants received Alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 week(Q4W) alternating with placebo(for alirocumab)Q4W added to lowest-strength statin therapy(atorvastatin 5 mg daily),stable non-statin LMT/diet therapy alone for 12weeks. Participants completed DBTP,entered open-label treatment period(OLTP),received alirocumab 150 mg Q4W up to additional 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg every 2 weeks(Q2W) at Week 24(OLTP:Week 12),when targeted LDL-C level at Week 20 not achieved as Japan Atherosclerosis Society Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012:1) ≥100 mg/dL(2.59 mmol/L) in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) participants/non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH)participants with history of documented coronary heart disease;2) ≥120 mg/dL(3.10 mmol/L)in non-FH participants with history of documented diseases/other risk factors as categorized in primary prevention category III)
Stable cholesterol-lowering diet as background therapy.
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector.
Other Names:
  • SAR236553
  • REGN727
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector.
Atorvastatin 5 mg tablet orally.
Ezetimibe, Bezafibrate or Fenofibrate at stable dose as background therapy.
Experimental: Alirocumab 150 mg Q2W
In DBTP, participants received Alirocumab 150 mg subcutaneous (SC) injection Q2W added to lowest-strength statin therapy (atorvastatin 5 mg daily), stable non-statin LMT or diet therapy alone for 12 weeks. Participants who completed DBTP were entered in OLTP and received alirocumab 150 mg Q4W up to additional 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W at Week 24 (Week 12 of OLTP), when targeted LDL-C levels at Week 20 were not achieved i.e. LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) according to Japan Atherosclerosis Society(JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
Stable cholesterol-lowering diet as background therapy.
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector.
Other Names:
  • SAR236553
  • REGN727
Atorvastatin 5 mg tablet orally.
Ezetimibe, Bezafibrate or Fenofibrate at stable dose as background therapy.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo Q2W
In DBTP, participants received Placebo (for alirocumab) SC injection Q2W added to lowest-strength statin therapy (atorvastatin 5 mg), stable non-statin LMT or diet therapy alone for 12 weeks. Participants who completed DBTP were entered in OLTP and received alirocumab 150 mg Q4W up to additional 52 weeks. Alirocumab dose up-titrated to 150 mg Q2W at Week 24 (Week 12 of OLTP), when targeted LDL-C levels at Week 20 were not achieved i.e. LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) or ≥120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) according to JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012.
Stable cholesterol-lowering diet as background therapy.
Solution for injection, one subcutaneous injection in the abdomen, thigh, or outer area of upper arm with a disposable auto-injector.
Atorvastatin 5 mg tablet orally.
Ezetimibe, Bezafibrate or Fenofibrate at stable dose as background therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12- Intent to Treat (ITT) Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted Least-squares (LS) means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from a mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) to account for missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were used in the model (ITT analysis).
From Baseline to Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 12- On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 12 (i.e. up to 21 days after last double-blind injection).
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C to Averaged Week 10 to 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment and assigning a weight of 0.5 for Week 10 and 12 time points.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C to Averaged Week 10 to 12- On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 12 (i.e. up to 21 days after last double-blind injection) and assigning a weight of 0.5 for Week 10 and 12 time points.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apo-B at Week 12- On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data at from Week 4 to Week 12 (i.e. up to 21 days after last double-blind injection).
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at Week 12- On-treatment Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from MMRM model including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 12 (i.e. up to 21 days after last double-blind injection).
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 12- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C Goal at Week 12- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Calculated LDL-C goal was defined as calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) for heterozygous familiar hypercholesterolemia (heFH) participants or non-familial hypercholesterolemia (non-FH) participants who had a history of documented CHD, or <120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) for non-FH participants who had a history of documented diseases or other risk factors as defined in JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012. Adjusted percentages at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
Up to Week 12
Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C Goal at Week 12- On-Treatment Analysis
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
Calculated LDL-C goal was defined as calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) for heFH participants or non-FH participants who had a history of documented CHD, or <120 mg/dL (3.10 mmol/L) for non-FH participants who had a history of documented diseases or other risk factors as defined in JAS Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2012. Adjusted percentages at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach including available post-baseline on-treatment data from Week 4 to Week 12 (i.e. up to 21 days after last double-blind injection).
Up to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Lipoprotein (a) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 were obtained from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model for handling of missing data. All available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment were included in the imputation model.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) at Week 12- ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Fasting Triglycerides (TGs) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted means and standard errors at Week 12 from multiple imputation approach followed by robust regression model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Apolipoprotein A-1 (Apo A-1) at Week 12: ITT Analysis
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 12
Adjusted LS means and standard errors at Week 12 from MMRM model including all available post-baseline data from Week 4 to Week 12 regardless of status on- or off-treatment.
From Baseline to Week 12

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated LDL-C at Week 20, 24, 36, 48 and 64 -OLTP Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 20, 24, 36, 48 and 64
Baseline, Weeks 20, 24, 36, 48 and 64

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

January 9, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

October 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 3, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EFC14305
  • U1111-1170-7697 (Other Identifier: UTN)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypercholesterolemia

Clinical Trials on Diet Alone

Search Similar Trials