Messages for Increasing Dairy Consumption (MilkMessage)
Testing the Effectiveness of Targeted, Framed, -Efficacy Enhancing Messages for Increasing Milk and Milk Product Consumption in Adults Aged 30--50 Years.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
- Health and Exercise Psychology Laboratory
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between 30 and 50 years of age
- Consume less than 2 servings of milk or milk products per day
- No health or religious reasons to avoid milk and milk products
- Regular access to the internet
- Can speak and read English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Dietary restrictions, allergies, or medical reasons for limiting dairy intake will be excluded
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Gain-Framed
Participants receive messages that highlight the potential benefits of engaging in a specific behaviour (i.e., what positive outcomes they could experience from consuming milk and milk products).
|
Participants will be randomised to one of five message conditions.
Each condition will receive a total of four emailed messages on four consecutive days (i.e., 1 message per day).
Participants in the Gain-Framed message condition will receive message content that highlights the potential benefits of consuming milk and milk products (i.e., high protein content, stronger hair and nail etc.)
|
|
Experimental: Loss-Framed
Participants receive messages that highlight the potentially loses of not engaging in a specific behaviour (i.e., what they could lose from not consuming milk and milk products).
|
Participants will be randomised to one of five message conditions.
Each condition will receive a total of four emailed messages on four consecutive days (i.e., 1 message per day).
Participants in the Loss-Framed message condition will receive message content that highlights the potential losses of not consuming milk and milk products (i.e., lack of essential nutrients, less calcium).
|
|
Experimental: Self-Regulatory Efficacy
Participants receive messages that provide them with tips and strategies on how to engage in the consumption of milk and milk products (i.e., recipes, meal planning etc.)
|
Participants will be randomised to one of five message conditions.
Each condition will receive a total of four emailed messages on four consecutive days (i.e., 1 message per day).
Participants in the Self-Regulatory Efficacy message condition will receive information pertaining to how to include milk and milk products within their diet.
This information will come in the form of recipes, meal planning, food combining etc.
|
|
Experimental: Gain-Framed + Self-Regulatory Efficacy
Participants receive messages that highlight the potential benefits of engaging in a specific behaviour (i.e., what positive outcomes they could experience from consuming milk and milk products) and these messages also provide tips and strategies on how to engage in the consumption of milk and milk products (i.e., recipes, meal planning etc.).
|
Participants will be randomised to one of five message conditions.
Each condition will receive a total of four emailed messages on four consecutive days (i.e., 1 message per day).
Participants in the Gain-Framed message + Self-Regulatory Efficacy condition will receive message content that highlights the potential benefits of consuming milk and milk products (i.e., high protein content, stronger hair and nail etc.) and information pertaining to how to include milk and milk products within their diet.
|
|
Experimental: Loss-Framed + Self-Regulatory Efficacy
Participants receive messages that highlight the potentially loses of not engaging in a specific behaviour (i.e., what they could lose from not consuming milk and milk products) and these messages also provide tips and strategies on how to engage in the consumption of milk and milk products (i.e., recipes, meal planning etc.).
|
Participants will be randomised to one of five message conditions.
Each condition will receive a total of four emailed messages on four consecutive days (i.e., 1 message per day).
Participants in the Loss-Framed message + Self-Regulatory Efficacy condition will receive message content that highlights the potential losses of not consuming milk and milk products (i.e., lack of essential nutrients, less calcium) and information pertaining to how to include milk and milk products within their diet.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes from baseline in calcium from dairy at 1 and 4-week follow up
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-week follow-up, 4-week follow-up
|
Calcium consumed from dairy was assessed using a modified version of the "Calcium Calculator™" developed by the British Columbia Dairy Foundation.
The original tool assesses consumption of calcium from a comprehensive list of 30 commonly consumed calcium containing products.
For this study individuals were asked to indicate the portions they ate of 10 dairy products included in the list.
An explanation of a portion was provided for each item.
Milligrams of calcium consumed by participants on the previous day was determined for baseline, week 1 and week 4 follow-up.
|
Baseline, 1-week follow-up, 4-week follow-up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-Regulatory Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
Changes in participants self-regulatory efficacy beliefs was assessed using an 18-item measure at baseline, 1-day after completion of the intervention and at 4-week follow-up.
Self-regulatory efficacy beliefs items were context specific.
Responses were scored on a scale of 0% (not at all) to 100% (extremely confident) with response options in 10% increments.
|
Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Outcome Expectations
Time Frame: Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
Changes in participants outcome expectations was assessed at baseline, 1-day after completion of the intervention and at 4-week follow-up.
The perceived likelihood of positive (16 items) and negative (5 items) outcomes occurring as a result of consuming milk and milk products was assessed using a 21-item measure.
Responses were scored on a 9-point scale from 1 (very unlikely) to 9 (very likely).
|
Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
|
Outcome Values
Time Frame: Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
Changes in participants outcome values was assessed at baseline, 1-day after completion of the intervention and at 4-week follow-up.
The perceived value of positive (16 items) and negative (5 items) outcomes occurring as a result of consuming milk and milk products was assessed using a 21-item measure.
Responses were scored on a 9-point scale with a range of 1 (little value to me) to 9 (high value to me).
|
Baseline, Immedately after the Intervention (1-day), 4-Week Follow-Up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981 Jan 30;211(4481):453-8. doi: 10.1126/science.7455683.
- Jung ME, Martin Ginis KA, Phillips SM, Lordon CD. Increasing calcium intake in young women through gain-framed, targeted messages: a randomised controlled trial. Psychol Health. 2011 May;26(5):531-47. doi: 10.1080/08870441003611544.
- Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. NJ US: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- H12-00332
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.