Pronator Quadratus Repair After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures

November 1, 2015 updated by: Technical University of Munich

Pronator Quadratus Repair After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fractures or Not? - Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial

Investigation of the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with regard to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair.

Randomization of the patients in two groups ( PQ repair and no repair) and follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Investigation of the influence of the pronator quadratus (PQ) muscle repair following volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures with special regards to the forearm pronation strength. During the early recovery period of 3 months an improvement of pronation strength and functional scorings was hypothesized for the PQ repair when compared to no repair.

Therefore the patients are randomized to group A = PQ repair and group B = no repair. Follow-up examinations after 6 and 12 weeks are scheduled included bilateral isometric pronation strength measurement, range of motion, the QuickDASH and the Mayo-Wrist-Score, and a visual analogue scale (VAS)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • isolated, closed fractures of the distal radius
  • fractures type A2 to B2 according to the AO fracture classification system
  • primary volar locking plate osteosynthesis within 7 days after trauma

Exclusion Criteria:

  • concomitant fractures of the affected upper extremity
  • intra-articular distal radius fractures ( type C)
  • concomitant neurovascular injuries
  • preexisting neurological illnesses
  • initial external fixation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: PQ (Pronator quadraus) repair
Following volar plate osteosynthesis the pronator quadratus muscle is sutured with 3 to 5 U-shaped stitches using a polyfilament absorbable synthetic suture.
Procedure: Pronator quadratus repair
Suturing of the pronator quadratus muscle
No Intervention: No PQ repair
Following volar plate osteosynthesis the pronator quadratus muscle is placed in its anatomical position without suture repair.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Isometric forearm pronation strength (N)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the isometric forearm pronation strength (N) using the IsoForce-Control EVO 2 dynamometer (MDS AG, Oberburg, Switzerland)
6 weeks postoperative
Isometric forearm pronation strength (N)
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the isometric forearm pronation strength (N) using the IsoForce-Control EVO 2 dynamometer (MDS AG, Oberburg, Switzerland)
12 weeks postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quick DASH Score (Patient-reported evaluation score for disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
The score is assessed on the basis of a questionnaire (11 questions about disabilities in the daily life and symptoms as pain, sleeplessness, paresthesia)
6 weeks postoperative
Quick DASH Score (Patient-reported evaluation score for disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand)
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperative
The score is assessed on the basis of a questionnaire (11 questions about disabilities in the daily life and symptoms as pain, sleeplessness, paresthesia)
12 weeks postoperative
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the pain level
6 weeks postoperative
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the pain level
12 weeks postoperative
Mayo-Wrist-Score (Physician-based evaluation score of the wrist function)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
Assessment of the wrist function (grip strength, range of motion, pain intensity, functional status (return to work))
6 weeks postoperative
Mayo-Wrist-Score (Physician-based evaluation score of the wrist function)
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperative
Assessment of the wrist function (grip strength, range of motion, pain intensity, functional status (return to work))
12 weeks postoperative
Assessment of the bilateral wrist motion (AO neutral-0-method)
Time Frame: 6 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the wrist motion using a goniometer, injured and uninjured hand (Pronation/ Supination, Ulnarabduction/ Radialabduction, Palmarflexion/ Dorsalextension)
6 weeks postoperative
Assessment of the bilateral wrist motion (AO neutral-0-method)
Time Frame: 12 weeks postoperative
Measurement of the wrist motion using a goniometer, injured and uninjured hand (Pronation/ Supination, Ulnarabduction/ Radialabduction, Palmarflexion/ Dorsalextension)
12 weeks postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technical University of Munich

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sebastian Siebenlist, MD, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
  • Principal Investigator: Gunther Sandmann, MD, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 3, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 1, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2759/10

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Forearm Pronation Strength Recovery

Clinical Trials on Pronator quadratus repair

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings