Rod and Cone Mediated Function in Retinal Disease

August 28, 2026 updated by: National Eye Institute (NEI)

Background:

Retinal diseases cause the loss of rod and cone photoreceptors. Symptoms include vision loss and night blindness. Researchers want to learn about rod and cone function in healthy people and people with retinal disease. They want to know if how well a person sees in the dark can test the severity of retinal disease.

Objectives:

To find out if how well a person sees in the dark can test the severity of retinal disease. To find out if this can help detect retinal disease and track its changes.

Eligibility:

People ages 5 and older with:

Retinal disease OR

20/20 vision or better with or without correction in at least one eye

Design:

Participants will be screened with medical and eye history and eye exam. Those with retinal disease will also have:

Eye imaging: Drops dilate the eye and pictures are taken of it.

Visual field testing: Participants look into a bowl and press a button when they see light.

Electroretinogram (ERG): An electrode is taped to the forehead. Participants sit in the

dark with their eyes patched for 30 minutes. Then they get numbing drops and contact

lenses. Participants watch lights while retina signals are recorded.

Visit 1 will be 3-8 hours. Participants will have up to 6 more visits over 6-12 months. Visits include:

Eye exam and imaging

Time course of dark adaptation: Participants view a background light for 5 minutes then

push a button when they see colored light.

Dark adapted sensitivity: Participants sit in the dark for 45 minutes. They push a button when

they see colored light.

For participants with retinal disease, ERG and visual field testing

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Objective: The objective of this protocol is to investigate local changes in rod and cone photoreceptor function across the retina in healthy volunteers and participants with retinal disease.

Study Population: Up to 250 healthy volunteers and 250 participants, age five or older, with retinal disease.

Design: This single-center, observational, case-control study will be comprised of three related Aims that assess rod and cone function with commercial perimeters and/or a commercial Cambridge Research Systems computer monitor (Display++) specialized for displaying stimuli at low light intensities. For Aim 1 the normal retinal sensitivity ranges will be established for both fundus-guided and non-guided perimeters. For Aim 2, the normal range for describing the kinetics of dark adaptation following bleaching of retinal rhodopsin will be established for the fundus-guided and non-guided perimeters. For Aim 3, local changes in rod and cone photoreceptor function across the retina in participants with retinal disease will be examined from measurement of the kinetics of dark adaptation, scotopic and photopic retinal sensitivity, and/or Radial Frequency (RF) hyperacuity on the Display++ monitor. Testing may also include patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires to assess vision problems under low luminance conditions. For Aim 4, a subset of retinal disease participants (approximately 40) will complete two electroretinogram (ERG) sessions to develop a scaling factor to allow comparison with historical clinical data. The scaling factor will be used in the NEI ophthalmology clinic to account for changes in ERG parameters in patients tested using the current system compared to older clinical results.

Outcome Measures: The primary outcome for this study is to establish normal ranges for A) the kinetics of dark adaptation (time), B) retinal sensitivity (dB) for the fundus-guided and non-guided perimeters, and C) RF hyperacuity on the Display++ monitor. The secondary outcomes will be to examine changes in the kinetics of dark adaptation, scotopic and photopic retinal sensitivity, and/or RF hyperacuity in participants with retinal disease and potentially correlate these clinical measures with patients self-reported evaluation of their vision under low luminance conditions. An exploratory outcome will be to define a scaling factor for ERGs recorded with the RM electrode on the MonCV electrophysiology systems (MonCvONE and MonPackONE, Metrovision France) with the ERG data previously recorded with the Burian-Allen (BA) electrode on the commercial UTAS(TM) electrophysiology system.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892
        • Recruiting
        • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Up to 250 participants with retinal disease will be enrolled and up to 120 healthy volunteers will be enrolled.

Description

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:
  • Participant must be five years of age or older.
  • Participant (or legal guardian) must understand and sign the protocol s informed consent document.
  • Participant must be able to cooperate with the testing required for this study.

For Participants with retinal disease only:

  • Participant must have retinal disease, defined as evidence of loss of retinal dysfunction and/or degeneration as established by standard clinical methods including perimetry, ERG and imaging.
  • Participant must have a measurable visual acuity.

For Healthy Volunteers only:

-Participant must have visual acuity of 20/20 or better, with or without correction (e.g., glasses or contact lens) in at least one eye.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

-Participant with changes in pre-retinal media sufficient to obscure a view of the retina.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Affected
Participants with retinal disease
Unaffected
Healthy volunteers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcomes for this study are to establish normal ranges for the kinetics of dark adaptation and dark-adapted retinal sensitivity for the fundus guided and non-guided perimeters and for RF hyperacuity on the Display++.
Time Frame: ongoing, up to 10 visits in 5 years
The primary outcomes for this study are to establish normal ranges for the kinetics of dark adaptation and dark-adapted retinal sensitivity for the fundus guided and non-guided perimeters and for RF hyperacuity on the Display++.
ongoing, up to 10 visits in 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary outcomes will be to examine changes in the kinetics of dark adaptation and dark-adapted retinal sensitivity, and scotopic and photopic RF hyperacuity in participants with retinal disease.
Time Frame: ongoing, up to four visits in 5 years
Secondary outcomes will be to examine changes in the kinetics of dark adaptation and dark-adapted retinal sensitivity, and scotopic and photopic RF hyperacuity in participants with retinal disease.
ongoing, up to four visits in 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Eye Institute (NEI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Brett G Jeffrey, Ph.D., National Eye Institute (NEI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 24, 2016

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 28, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2015

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 1, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 18, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 160024
  • 16-EI-0024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings