Evaluation and Treatment of Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Moderate to Severe CF

July 12, 2019 updated by: Jennifer Taylor-Cousar, National Jewish Health

Evaluation and Treatment of Pulmonary Vascular Disease in Moderate to Severe Cystic Fibrosis Lung Disease

This study evaluates the ability of the drug sildenafil to improved exercise capacity, cardiac performance during exercise, and quality of life in patients with moderate to severe CF lung disease. 3/4 of the subjects will receive sildenafil and 1/4 will receive placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Over time, patients with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) develop disabling lung disease that progresses to chronic respiratory failure, exercise intolerance with marked limitation of physical activity, and premature death. Despite substantial improvements in care, patients with CF often develop pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) that leads to pulmonary hypertension. Previous studies have clearly linked severe pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure with high mortality in CF. Early clinical manifestations of PVD prior to the development of cor pulmonale include shortness of breath and dyspnea with exertion, but the extent to which PVD contributes to the decline in exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with CF is not known. Early evidence of PVD could be recognized in CF patients through standardized exercise testing and echocardiographic evaluation. Identifying those CF patients with PVD prior to the onset of right ventricular dysfunction may allow pharmacologic intervention to attenuate the progression of cardiovascular disease and improve quality of life. Clinical trials have demonstrated that treatment with the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, sildenafil, can decrease pulmonary vascular resistance and improve exercise tolerance in non-CF patients with pulmonary hypertension. Because experimental and clinical studies have implicated impaired NO-cGMP signaling in the pathophysiology of lung disease in CF, sildenafil may provide a novel pharmacological approach for treating PVD in patients with CF lung disease.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
14

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80206
        • National Jewish Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed diagnosis of CF based on the following criteria: Positive sweat chloride ≥60mEq/liter (by pilocarpine iontophoresis) and/or Genotype with two identifiable mutations consistent with CF, and accompanied by one or more clinical features consistent with the CF phenotype
  2. Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
  3. FEV1 ≥ 20% predicted and ≤ 70% predicted (Hankinson)
  4. Clinically stable without evidence of acute upper or lower respiratory tract infection or current pulmonary exacerbation within the 14 days prior to the screening visit
  5. Ability to reproducibly perform spirometry (according to ATS criteria)
  6. Ability to understand and sign a written informed consent or assent and comply with the requirements of the study
  7. Willingness to maintain chronic CF medication schedule (e.g. alternating month inhaled antibiotics)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of hypersensitivity to sildenafil
  2. Use of an investigational agent within the 4-week period prior to Visit 1 (Day 0)
  3. Breastfeeding, pregnant, or verbal expression of unwillingness to practice an acceptable birth control method (abstinence, hormonal or barrier methods, partner sterilization or intrauterine device) during participation in the study for women of child-bearing potential.
  4. History of significant hepatic disease (AST or ALT > 5 times the upper limit of normal at screening, documented biliary cirrhosis, or portal hypertension),
  5. History of significant cardiovascular disease (history of aortic stenosis, coronary artery disease, or life-threatening arrhythmia),
  6. History of severe neurological disease (e.g. history of stroke),
  7. History of severe hematologic disease (e.g. history of bleeding diathesis; current INR > 2.0
  8. History of severe ophthalmologic disease (e.g. history of retinal impairment or non-arteritic ischemic optic neuritis)
  9. History of severe renal impairment (creatinine >1.8 mg/dL.)
  10. Inability to swallow pills
  11. Previous organ transplantation
  12. Use of concomitant nitrates, α-blocker, or Ca channel blocker (currently or within one month of Visit 1)
  13. Use of concomitant medications known to be potent inhibitors of CYP3A4 [e.g. ketoconazole, itraconazole, ritonavir, clarithromycin, erythromycin, rifampin (currently or within one month of initiation of study drug)] NOTE: use of azithromycin is NOT a cause for exclusion
  14. History of sputum or throat swab culture yielding Burkholderia cepacia or Mycobacterium massiliense within 2 years of screening
  15. Weight less than 40 kg at Screening
  16. History of migraine headaches.
  17. Resting room air oxygen saturation <80% without supplemental oxygen
  18. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of the data
  19. Start of CFTR modulator therapy less than 1 month prior to first dose of sildenafil or placebo
  20. Use of anticoagulants
  21. Frank pulmonary hypertension (RVSP >40 mmHg by ECHO)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Sildenafil
Subjects will be randomized in a 3:1 (sildenafil:placebo) fashion. Subjects randomized to the treatment arm will receive sildenafil 20 mg p.o. t.i.d for 1 week followed by 40 mg p.o. t.i.d. for 11 weeks.
Drug: sildenafil
active sildenafil
Other Names:
  • Revatio, Viagra
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects randomized to the placebo arm will receive placebo p.o. t.i.d for 1 week followed by 2 placebo tablets p.o. t.i.d. for 11 weeks.
Drug: placebo
sugar pill that looks like sildenafil tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 Minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: Weeks 1, 13
Change in distance walked between week 1 and week 13 were compared. The difference between the two time points is reported.
Weeks 1, 13
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Work Rate
Time Frame: Weeks 1 and 13
Work rate (the amount of energy being expended to cycle) was assessed at weeks 1 and 13. The change in maximum work measured during CPET between weeks 1 and 13 is reported.
Weeks 1 and 13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life-Revised Respiratory Domain Score
Time Frame: Assessed at weeks 1 and 13
The CFQ-R Respiratory domain score (scale 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life) was assessed at weeks 1 and 13. The change in the score between week 1 and week 13 is reported.
Assessed at weeks 1 and 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Jewish Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar, MD, National Jewish Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 29, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 7, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 10, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NationalJewishHealth

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings