Inhibition of Co-Stimulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis (ICoSRA)

January 11, 2016 updated by: NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
The purpose of this study is to use abatacept as a clinical molecular probe to evaluate the effects of inhibiting costimulation on immune responses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory immune mediated arthritis which leads to pain, swelling and destruction of joints. RA affects more than 500,000 subjects in the United Kingdom (UK) and incurs significant health and economic cost. Most patients require potent immune suppressing drugs such as methotrexate, which help reduce pain and stiffness, and protect the joints against damage. However, many patients do not respond or are unable to tolerate methotrexate. In these patients, biologic drugs such as abatacept are used to try to control the arthritis.

Abatacept is designed to target and inhibit a specific molecule involved in "costimulation" of the inflammatory signal that is thought to be important in RA. While abatacept has been shown to be effective in trials and clinical practice, the exact mechanism of action of abatacept in RA has not been fully elucidated. Understanding these actions is likely to inform both the use of abatacept in RA and lead to increased understanding of inflammation in humans with implications for further therapies. This six month prospective open label study, therefore, aims to investigate the effects of inhibiting costimulation on a variety of important inflammatory cell types and processes in humans with RA.

25 participants with RA who have bad prognostic genetic markers (Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and human leukocyte antigen (HLADR4) and who were scheduled to receive subcutaneous abatacept as part of their standard clinical treatment will be recruited. Consenting participants will followed for a total of 24 weeks during which time they will have additional venous blood and urine samples taken to investigate the effects of abatacept on their immune cells and system. The primary endpoint of the study is the characterisation of the immune response following costimulatory modulation in RA patients at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints include change in immunological response and its association with clinical outcome measures up to 24 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
        • Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • RA as defined by the 2010 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) classification criteria

  • Eligible for abatacept therapy according to local/national guidelines

    • Active RA defined by DAS28 score required by local guidelines for eligibility for abatacept
    • Have previously failed (efficacy or tolerance) at least one disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)
    • Have no contraindications to treatment with abatacept
  • Be able to tolerate methotrexate at dose of 10-25mg/week, either orally or subcutaneously
  • Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) positive
  • Human leukocyte antigen D related (HLA-DR) B1*0401 or 0404) positive
  • Able and willing to give written informed consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of or current autoimmune rheumatic disease other than RA
  • Concomitant use of any biologic agent, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors
  • Previous abatacept treatment
  • Patients requiring >10mg prednisolone daily or intramuscular (IM) corticosteroids
  • Active infection
  • Known HIV or hepatitis B/C infection
  • Latent tuberculosis (TB) infection
  • Malignancy (other than non-melanoma skin cell cancers) within 5 years
  • Women who are pregnant, women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to use appropriate contraception or breast-feeding
  • Inability to give informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Abatacept
Abatacept 125mg administered via subcutaneous injection once a week for 24 weeks
Drug: Abatacept
Abatacept 125mg/ml

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunological response
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 weeks
Change in T cell immune response to citrullinated peptides following costimulatory modulation
Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Immunological response
Time Frame: Baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Change in immunological response from baseline, as measured by transcriptional profile of relevant cell subset
Baseline, 4, 12 and 24 weeks
Clinical response American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in ACR 20 from baseline
Baseline and 24 weeks
Clinical response Disease Activity Score (DAS)28
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 weeks
Change in DAS 28 from baseline
Baseline and 24 weeks
T cell profile
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
Change in T cell subpopulation profile from baseline
Baseline, 12 and 24 weeks
T cell response
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Antigen-specific T cell response to tetanus
24 weeks
DC (CD11c+) phenotype
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Dendritic cell (DC) (CD11c+) phenotype as measured by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II expression
24 weeks
Biomarkers
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Preliminary identification of biomarkers of response using urinary metabol/proteomic analysis
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Glasgow

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Iain McInnes, Prof, University of Glasgow

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GN13RH410
  • 2014-004419-35 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings