Hypnosis to Reduce Aromatase Inhibitor Pain and Improve Adherence

June 15, 2021 updated by: Guy Montgomery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Hypnosis to Reduce Aromatase Inhibitor (AI) Associated Musculoskeletal Pain and to Improve AI Adherence: An RCT to Explore Efficacy and Cost Effects

The purpose of this study is to determine whether hypnosis is efficacious in reducing musculoskeletal pain in breast cancer survivors taking aromatase inhibitors, and by doing so, whether hypnosis can help survivors to be more adherent to their medication regimen.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of hypnosis for reducing musculoskeletal pain (MSP) in women taking aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for breast cancer. Research indicates that AIs are associated with musculoskeletal pain in up to 61% of breast cancer survivors. AI-associated MSP can include joint pain in the wrists, hands, and knees; carpal tunnel syndrome and trigger finger; and decreased grip strength, morning stiffness, and general muscle pain. MSP can lead to difficulty performing daily activities and can reduce quality of life in breast cancer survivors. This pain is not only aversive in and of itself, but also is associated with non-adherence to prescribed, daily AI regimens. In some studies, AI non-adherence estimates were as high as 50%.

At the present time, there is no "gold standard" treatment for AI-associated MSP. What is needed is an intervention that: reduces breast cancer survivors' MSP and helps them be more adherent to their prescribed AI regimen, does not have side-effects of its own, does not place a large time or financial burden on survivors, and which can be taught to survivors to practice on their own.

Hypnosis, a mind-body intervention, has been widely demonstrated to reduce pain. In fact, analgesia is perhaps the best known effect of hypnosis. Meta-analyses have consistently supported the efficacy of hypnosis for pain control, including chronic pain. Hypnosis also has a long tradition in cancer symptom management, especially for pain reduction. Hypnosis has been defined as an agreement between a person designated as the hypnotist (e.g., health care professional) and a person designated as the client or patient to participate in a psychotherapeutic technique based on the hypnotist providing suggestions for changes in sensation, perception, cognition, affect, mood, or behavior.

This study will examine whether or not hypnosis is helpful in reducing breast cancer survivors' AI-related MSP and in improving their adherence to their prescribed AI regimen. This study will also examine whether the hypnosis intervention is cost effective. To answer these questions, this randomized clinical trial will compare hypnosis (three sessions) to a non-hypnosis, attention control, empathic listening condition (three sessions). For each intervention, the first session will be approximately 40 minutes, and sessions 2 and 3 will be approximately 30 minutes each. Both interventions will be delivered face-to-face, by a doctoral-level psychology professional.

All participants will be taking AIs for breast cancer, will be experiencing some musculoskeletal pain since starting AIs (≥3 on a 10 point scale), and will be randomized to one of the two intervention groups. Study participants will be asked to complete measures of pain, AI adherence, and other behavioral and psychosocial measures over the course of 12-month period. The follow-up assessments will evaluate the clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of hypnosis versus professional attention.

Overall, this project is a critical step towards reducing the struggles of breast cancer survivors experiencing AI-related MSP, and associated non-adherence. By reducing MSP and improving AI adherence, the hypnosis intervention tested here has the potential to improve quality of life and well-being.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
191

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female
  • Diagnosed with Stage 0-III hormone-receptor positive breast cancer
  • Taking a third-generation aromatase inhibitor (AI) (e.g., anastrozole (Arimidex), letrozole (Femara), or exemestane (Aromasin)) for at least 3 months left in their AI prescription to complete all study assessments (e.g., at least one year left on AIs)
  • Experiencing ongoing pain and/or stiffness in one or more joints, which started or worsened after initiation of AI therapy
  • Having a baseline worst pain score over the past week on the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) of ≥ 3 on a 0 to 10 scale
  • Over age 18
  • Able to speak and read English (to allow for participation in study intervention sessions)
  • Consent to the study
  • Be willing to be randomized to experimental conditions
  • Willing to travel to Mount Sinai for study procedures (e.g., intervention sessions, follow-up appointments).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory, metabolic or neuropathic arthropathies at the time of recruitment
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Past cancer. Patients will be excluded if they have ever been diagnosed with cancer (including DCIS/LCIS) prior to the breast cancer for which the present course of AIs is being prescribed. However, patients will be eligible if they have a history of non-metastatic, non-melanomatous skin cancer
  • Metastatic (Stage IV) breast cancer, as their treatment and outcomes typically follow a different course
  • Bone fracture/surgery of an extremity during the preceding 6 months
  • Non-steroidal joint injection within the last 3 months.
  • Current use of corticosteroids, defined as oral, intravenous (IV), or injections of corticosteroids in the past 4 weeks
  • Regular use of narcotics.
  • Patients will be excluded due to the presence of the following psychiatric conditions: dementia, psychosis, current mania or uncontrolled major depressive disorder, or addictive disorder or current intoxication.
  • In the rare instance of the presence of a comorbidity that does not fall into any of the above mentioned exclusion criteria, but that is clinically determined to significantly interfere with the patient's ability to participate in the study (e.g., cognitive impairment)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Hypnosis
The hypnosis intervention involves three, face-to-face, hypnosis sessions delivered by doctoral-level psychology professionals
Behavioral: Hypnosis

The hypnosis intervention involves three parts. First, participants will receive three, face-to-face hypnosis sessions delivered by doctoral-level psychology professionals. The sessions are based on materials developed by experienced psychologists in the Integrative Behavioral Medicine Program at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Second, participants will be taught how to use hypnosis themselves (self-hypnosis) to help manage their pain. Third, participants will receive a hypnosis recording to listen to in-between sessions and throughout the course of the study. At home hypnosis practice will be recommended.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires over a period of 12 months.
Active Comparator: Attention Control (Non-Hypnosis)
The attention control intervention is matched to the hypnosis intervention in terms of the amount of professional time received by patients.
Behavioral: Attention Control

The attention control intervention involves three face-to-face meetings with a doctoral-level psychology professional. During these sessions, participants will be asked to discuss with the interventionist their experience of taking aromatase inhibitors and associated musculoskeletal pain. The interventionist will not lead the patient in imagery, relaxation, evaluation of thought processes, or even simple discussion. Rather interventionists will allow the patient to direct the flow of the conversation and will provide support and empathy. Interventionist contact time in AC sessions will be identical to that in the hypnosis group. Overall, the attention control intervention will control for professional attention.

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires over a period of 12 months.

Other Names:
  • Non-Hypnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-reported musculoskeletal pain (MSP) as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF)
Time Frame: 12 months
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) is a self-report questionnaire assessing pain.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
eCap measure
Time Frame: 12 months
Adherence to aromatase inhibitors as measured by the eCap system. The eCap system is a medication event monitoring system that tracks medication usage without active patient input. eCaps record the date and time whenever the cap is opened to remove a pill.
12 months
The Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN)
Time Frame: 12 months
AUSCAN is a self-report measure of musculoskeletal pain.
12 months
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)
Time Frame: 12 months
WOMAC is a self-report measure of musculoskeletal pain.
12 months
The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial-Musculoskeletal Symptom (BCPT-MS)
Time Frame: 12 months
BCPT-MS is a self-report measure of musculoskeletal pain.
12 months
The Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS)
Time Frame: 12 months
MARS is a self-reported measure of AI adherence.
12 months
The Healthcare Consumption, Illness and Work Questionnaire (Adapted TiC-P)
Time Frame: 12 months
Adapted TiC-P is a self-report measure to calculate costs associated with AI-related musculoskeletal pain.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Guy H Montgomery, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 18, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 18, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 22, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GCO 14-1344
  • R01AT008762-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings