Assessment of Physical Functioning and Handling of Spiolto® Respimat® in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Requiring Long-acting Dual Bronchodilation in Routine Clinical Practice

March 12, 2018 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim
The primary objective of the study is to measure changes in physical functioning - serving as a surrogate for physical activity and exercise capacity - in COPD patients being treated with Spiolto® Respimat® after approximately 6 weeks. A secondary objective is to evaluate the patient¿s general condition (physician¿s evaluation) at visit 1 (baseline visit at the start of the study) and at visit 2 (final visit at the end of the study, approx. 6 weeks after visit 1), as well as patient satisfaction with Spiolto® Respimat® at visit 2.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1737

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Multiple Locations, Germany

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

COPD patients

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Written informed consent prior to participation
  2. Female and male patients = 40 years of age
  3. Patients diagnosed with COPD and requiring long-acting dual bronchodilation (LAMA + LABA) treatment according to approved Spiolto® Respimat® SmPC and COPD GOLD guideline recommendation

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with contraindications according to Spiolto® Respimat® SmPC
  2. Patients who have been treated with a LABA/LAMA combination (free and fixed dose) in the previous 6 months
  3. Patients continuing LABA- Inhalative Corticosteroides (iCS)treatment should not be additionally treated with Spiolto® Respimat® in order to avoid a double dosing of long-acting beta-agonists
  4. Patients for whom further follow-up is not possible at the enrolling site during the planned study period of approx. 6 weeks
  5. Pregnancy and lactation
  6. Patients currently listed for lung transplantation
  7. Current participation in any clinical trial or any other non-interventional study of a drug or device

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Spiolto Respimat
COPD patients requiring a fixed combination therapy of two long-acting bronchodilators (LAMA + LABA) according to approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC) and Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)guidelines
Drug: Spiolto Respimat
Tiotropium bromide + Olodaterol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With Therapeutic Success at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).
Time Frame: after approximately 6 weeks
Therapeutic success defined as a minimum 10-point increase of Physical functioning questionnaire (PF-10 ) score after approximately 6 weeks of Spiolto® Respimat® treatment The PF-10 used for assessing the primary outcome "physical functioning" is a sub-domain of the validated Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire and consists of 10 questions evaluating the extent of experienced restrictions while conducting usual activities. The total score ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better physical functioning.
after approximately 6 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the PF-10 Score From Visit 1 to Visit 2
Time Frame: baseline and approx. week 6
Change in PF-10 score was determined by taking into account the individual change of each patient between Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2).
baseline and approx. week 6
General Condition of the Patient, Evaluated by the Physician (PGE Score) at Visit 1 and Visit 2.
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
Physician's Global Evaluation (PGE) score documented by physicians at visit 1 (baseline) and at visit 2 (approx. 6 weeks later). the PGE score documented from 1 to 8. The highest value (=8) representing an excellent general condition
Baseline (Visit 1) and Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
Patient Overall Satisfaction With Spiolto® Respimat® at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).
Time Frame: Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how overall satisfied they were with the Spiolto® Respimat® treatment.
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
Patient Satisfaction With Inhaling From the Respimat® Device at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).
Time Frame: Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how satisfied they were by inhaling with the Respimat® device.
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
Patient Satisfaction With Handling of the Respimat® Inhalation Device at Week 6 (Approx.) (Visit 2).
Time Frame: Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)
At Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2) patients were asked how satisfied they were with handling of the Respimat® inhalation device
Week 6 (approx.) (Visit 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boehringer Ingelheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 13, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 15, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 12, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1237.42

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings