Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination (FRIEND)

August 1, 2019 updated by: Martin Balik, Charles University, Czech Republic

Fluid Responsiveness in Septic Shock Evaluated by Caval Ultrasound Doppler Examination - "FRIEND Study"

The study aims at clarification of venous collapsibility measures with real venous flow measurements during dynamic maneuver testing fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Sedated and mechanically ventilated patients in septic shock will be enrolled in the study. A fine catheter with ultrasound doppler probe will be introduced into the central venous catheter already in place in superior vena cava. Doppler signal will be evaluated by console prototype (NILUS Medical) and continuous analysis of blood flow velocity respiratory variation will be performed. These values will be compared to standard hemodynamic monitoring parameters (central venous and arterial pressures) and to parameters acquired by transoesophageal (TOE) and transthoracic echocardiography.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Czechia
      • Prague 2, Czechia, 120 00
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, General University Hospital, 1st Medical Faculty, Charles University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Martin Balik, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michal Porizka, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Miroslav Navratil, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

18 Years and older, mechanically ventilated ICU patients in septic shock

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients in severe sepsis or septic shock
  • intubation and mechanical ventilation
  • sedated patient without spontaneous respiratory efforts
  • central venous catheter in place inserted via right internal jugular vein
  • signed informed consent by family members

Exclusion Criteria:

  • superior vena cava vascular anomaly
  • irradiation of neck or mediastinum in medical history
  • thrombosis of superior vena cava in medical history
  • atrial fibrillation or other irregular rhythm
  • permanent or external pacemaker
  • aggressive mechanical ventilation (PEEP above 10 cm H2O, Pmax above 30 cm H2O)
  • TOE contraindication (oesophageal varices, stricture, tumour, upper gastrointestinal bleeding)
  • Pericardial effusion, constrictive pericarditis
  • Moderate or severe valvular lesion
  • Severe systolic dysfunction of the left (EF less than 30%) or right ventricle (FAC less than 25%)
  • Intraabdominal pressure above 20 mmHg
  • Open chest
  • Obvious severe hypovolemia ( LVEDA<5.5cm2/m2BSA)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid responsiveness
Time Frame: through the study, data collection during 1 year
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness, defined as 15% increase of cardiac output after reversible fluid challenge (using PLR - passive leg raise maneuver), by ultrasound doppler evaluation of superior vena caval blood flow respiratory variation.
through the study, data collection during 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of flow
Time Frame: through the study, data collection during 1 year
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness by measuring a change of blood flow velocity after PLR maneuver.
through the study, data collection during 1 year
Respiratory variation of flow velocity
Time Frame: through the study, data collection during 1 year
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness by measuring respiratory variation of blood flow velocity in left ventricular outflow tract after PLR maneuver
through the study, data collection during 1 year
Respiratory collapsibility
Time Frame: through the study, data collection during 1 year
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness by measuring respiratory collapsibility of inferior vena cava after PLR maneuver.
through the study, data collection during 1 year
Respiratory collapsibility
Time Frame: through the study, data collection during 1 year
Evaluation of fluid responsiveness by measuring respiratory collapsibility of superior vena cava after PLR maneuver
through the study, data collection during 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charles University, Czech Republic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 2, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 1, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 530/15 S-IV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings