Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Acute Pain in Hip and Femur Fractures

February 3, 2021 updated by: Ian Elliott Brown

Effects of Liposomal Bupivacaine for Acute Pain in Hip and Femur Fractures: a Randomized, Active Comparator-controlled, Blinded Trial

This is an investigator-initiated, single-center, randomized, patient blinded, controlled trial. The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of a fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) using 0.2% ropivacaine vs. liposomal bupivacaine in patients with femur and/or hip fractures admitted to the University of California Davis Medical Center (UCDMC). The primary endpoint will be the total opioid requirements during the 96 hour randomization period with secondary endpoints including total daily opioid requirements for days 1-4, duration of effect and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale (NRS) during their hospital stay.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In patients with femur or hip fractures, a fascia iliaca compartment block using liposomal bupivacaine will result in less total opioid administration during the randomization period compared to a fascia iliaca compartment block using 0.2% ropivacaine.

The long-term goal of this study is to provide pilot information to guide and design larger, multicenter trials which will evaluate the utility and cost-effectiveness of long acting liposomal bupivacaine as an opioid-sparring analgesic strategy in injured trauma patients. Ultimately, it is hoped that this information can improve safe and effective narcotic sparing analgesia in the awake, combat casualty, as well as serve as primary steps towards

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
3

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • University of California Davis Med Center- Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age ≥18 years ≤ 70 years
  2. Patient's s/p trauma, with confirmed femur and/or hip fractures with a planned admission to the hospital
  3. Patient is ambulatory without assistance (e.g. walker, cane, caretaker) prior to incident.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. >10 hours since presentation to the emergency department
  2. History of seizure disorder, recent seizure or a document intra-cranial hemorrhage.
  3. Central or peripheral neurologic deficit on presentation
  4. Concern or compartment syndrome
  5. Associated additional long bone fractures
  6. End stage liver failure
  7. Renal failure requiring dialysis
  8. Pregnancy or breast feeding
  9. Prisoners
  10. Coagulopathy with INR >1.5
  11. Use of direct thrombin inhibitors (bivalirudin, argatroban, desirudin, dabigatran etexilate), or direct factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban)
  12. Suspected prolonged intubation within first 12 hours secondary to respiratory failure other than peri-procedurally
  13. Adults unable to consent
  14. Pediatric patients <18 years old
  15. Patients exhibiting signs of shock upon admission, HR >120 or SBP <100 mmHg.
  16. History of allergic reaction to local anesthetics
  17. Administration of any other local anesthetic in the 2 hours prior to the study enrollment.
  18. Distal femur fractures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Liposomal Bupivacaine
In patients with femur or hip fractures, a fascia iliaca compartment block using liposomal bupivacaine will be administered
Drug: Liposomal Bupivacaine
A fascia iliaca compartment block using liposomal bupivacaine will require less total opioid administration compared to a fascia iliaca block using 0.2% ropivacaine
Other Names:
  • Exparel®
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Ropivacaine HCL
In patients with femur or hip fractures, a fascia iliaca block using using 0.2% ropivacaine will be administered
Drug: Ropivacaine HCL
Ropivacaine HCL is a member of the amino amide class of local anesthetics. Naropin injection is a sterile, isotonic solution that contains the enantiomerically pure drug substance, sodium chloride for isotonicity and water for injection. It is administered parenterally.
Other Names:
  • Naropin (trade name)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Opioid Requirements
Time Frame: Assessment time frame will be the initial 96 hours of inpatient status after study drug administration with a daily assessment of total daily opioid requirements and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale.
Total opioid requirements during the 96 hour randomization period measured in milligram morphine equivalents
Assessment time frame will be the initial 96 hours of inpatient status after study drug administration with a daily assessment of total daily opioid requirements and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Outcomes
Time Frame: Assessment time frame will be the initial 96 hours of inpatient status after study drug administration with a daily assessment of total daily opioid requirements and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale.
Total daily opioid requirements for days 1-3, duration of effect and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale (NRS) during their hospital stay
Assessment time frame will be the initial 96 hours of inpatient status after study drug administration with a daily assessment of total daily opioid requirements and objective pain scores using the numeric rating scale.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Ian Elliott Brown

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
United States Department of Defense

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ian Brown, MD, University of California, Davis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 9, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 3, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 782382
  • D6.715L15J91110 (OTHER_GRANT: Defense Health Program)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings