Can Pregabalin Reduce the Frequency and Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms After Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis?

November 12, 2019 updated by: Anat Galor, University of Miami
Can Lyrica (Pregabalin) help prevent severe Dry Eye post LASIK surgery?

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dry eye symptoms can occur after LASIK surgery. They generally get better with time but in some patients, they can persist. The investigators believe that in some individuals, dry eye symptoms after LASIK persist because the nerves in the cornea become hypersensitive. The investigators wish to study if a medication, called pregabalin, can protect corneal nerves at the time of LASIK surgery and decrease the frequency and severity of dry eye symptoms 6 months after surgery. This medication has been used in a similar way to reduce the frequency of uncomfortable sensations after other surgeries (knee, abdomen) but has never been studied in LASIK surgery.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33133
        • Anat Galor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 61 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 and 65 years of age
  • undergoing LASIK (unilateral or bilateral procedure).
  • Females of child-bearing age will need a negative urine or serum pregnancy test at the screening visit.
  • ocular and systemic medication regimen has been stable for 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating, participating in another study with an investigational drug within one month prior to screening
  • Using gabapentin, pregabalin, anti-convulsants, duloxetine, venlafaxine (SNRI), or tri-cyclic antidepressants
  • have a history of allergic, anaphylactic reaction, or severe systemic response to pregabalin or gabapentin
  • use corticosteroids chronically or during the month prior to surgery, or have a history of corneal disease (HSV or varicella zoster keratitis, prior corneal incisions (cataract surgery, radial keratotomy, LASIK), prior corneal ulcer).
  • patients with systemic co-morbidities that may confound DE such as HIV, sarcoidosis, graft-versus host disease or a collagen vascular disease.
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Pregabalin
Pregabalin 150 mg twice a day starting 1 day prior to LASIK and continuing for 14 days total.
Drug: Pregabalin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo pill twice a day starting 1 day prior to LASIK and continuing for 14 days total.
Drug: Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Severity of Dry Eye Symptoms as Assessed by the Dry Eye Questionnaire - 5 (DEQ5)
Time Frame: 6 months
DEQ5 total score ranges from 0-22 with the higher scores indicating increased dry eye. Absolute score will be reported from DEQ5 questionnaire completed at 6 month visit.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dry Eye Symptoms as Evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
OSDI total score ranges from 0-100 with a higher score indicating greater disability. Absolute scores will be reported from OSDI questionnaire completed at 3 and 6 month visit.
3 months, 6 months
Tear Production Measured by Schirmers Score
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Tear production will be measured via Schirmers score. Schirmer strips will be placed in the outer 1/3 of the lower conjunctivae. The Schirmer score will be evaluated as the length of wetting in mm in the Schirmer strips after 5 minutes. Absolute scores will be reported for the tear production evaluation at the 3 and 6 months visit.
3 months, 6 months
Tear Evaporation Measured by Tear Break up Time (TBUT)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
Participant will have 5 μl of preservative free fluorescein placed on their eye. The participant will then be positioned in the head rest of the slit lamp instrument and will be instructed to blink three times naturally and then not blink. The integrity of the tear film will be measured and, using a stopwatch, the time from the last blink until one or more black (dry) spots appear in the precorneal tear film will be recorded as TBUT. The absolute scores for TBUT completed on the 3 and 6 month visit will be reported.
3 months, 6 months
Eye Pain as Evaluated by the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory - Eye (NPSI-E)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
NPSI-E total score ranges from 0-100 with a higher score indicating increased eye pain. Absolute scores will be reported from NPSI-Eye questionnaire completed at 3 and 6 month visit.
3 months, 6 months
Eye Pain as Assessed by the Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (Sf-MPQ) Sensory
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
sf-MPQ Sensory has a total score ranging from 0-33 with a higher score indicating increased pain. Absolute scores will be reported from sf-MPQ Sensory questionnaire completed at 3 and 6 month visit.
3 months, 6 months
Eye Pain as Assessed by the Short Form - McGill Pain Questionnaire (Sf-MPQ) Affective
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
sf-MPQ Affective has a total score ranging from 0-12 with a higher score indicating increased pain. Absolute scores will be reported from sf-MPQ Affective questionnaire completed at 3 and 6 month visit.
3 months, 6 months
Eye Pain as Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months
NRS total score ranges from 0-10 over a one week recall period with the higher score indicating increased pain. Absolute scores will be reported from NRS questionnaire completed at 3 and 6 month visit.
3 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Miami

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Anat Galor, MD, MSPH, University of Miami

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 26, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 2, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 12, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 20160095

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings