Staging System for Chronic Symptomatic Pilonidal Sinus Disease

March 14, 2016 updated by: Ali GUNER, MD, Trabzon Numune Training and Research Hospital

A Proposed Staging System for Chronic Symptomatic Pilonidal Sinus Disease and Results in Patients Treated With Stage-based Approach

A staging system was defined based on morphological extent of disease (stage I to stage IV for primary disease, and stage R for recurrent disease). Specific surgical technique was used for each stage. Demographics, perioperative data, short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated according to the disease stage.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The collected data of patients who underwent surgery for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease prior to June 2011 were analyzed. Following this analysis, a staging system was defined based on morphological extent of disease (stage I to stage IV for primary disease, and stage R for recurrent disease). Specific surgical technique was used for each stage. "Pit-picking" technique was performed under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis in stage I and stage IIa patients. For stage IIb and stage III patients, the Bascom Cleft Lift /modified Bascom Cleft Lift techniques were performed. For stage IV patients, the rhomboid excision with the Limberg flap technique was used. Demographics, perioperative data, short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated according to the disease stage.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
367

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients that were operated because of chronic symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with symptomatic pilonidal sinus disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 y
  • Pilonidal sinus disease which identified incidentally and which presented with acute abscesses were not included to the staging system.
  • Patients who were treated without the use of the suggested algorithm were excluded from the analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
stage-I
Single pit in the midline, no lateral extension. Pit-picking technique will be performed.
Procedure: pit-picking technique
midline pits were excised removing a minimal amount of tissue (with a margin of skin of <1 mm). Incision of 1-2 cm in length was performed parallel to the most convenient side of the midline to be curetted of the chronic abscess cavity. All infected granulation tissue and hair were removed. After establishing hemostasis, the area of the excised midline pits was approximated by absorbable sutures.
Stage-II
>1 pits in the midline, no lateral extension. Pit-picking and Bascom cleft lift techniques will be performed.
Procedure: pit-picking technique
midline pits were excised removing a minimal amount of tissue (with a margin of skin of <1 mm). Incision of 1-2 cm in length was performed parallel to the most convenient side of the midline to be curetted of the chronic abscess cavity. All infected granulation tissue and hair were removed. After establishing hemostasis, the area of the excised midline pits was approximated by absorbable sutures.
Procedure: Bascom Cleft Lift
The upper end of the incision was made 1-2 cm lateral to the midline on the more affected side and this was continued vertically over a distance of 1-2 mm from the midline pits. The lower end was fashioned from the midline in a V-shape in order to prevent a dog-ear deformity. The skin on this side of the natal cleft was then elevated and excised. The skin on the opposite side was undermined to the distance required to allow primary closure of the defect away from the midline without tension. Sinus tissue and its extensions were excised. The incision was then closed subcuticularly by absorbable polyglecaprone (3-0), after which a few interrupted mattress polyglecaprone (3-0) buttress sutures were also inserted.
Stage-III
Midline pit/pits plus lateral extension in one direction. Bascom cleft lift technique will be performed.
Procedure: Bascom Cleft Lift
The upper end of the incision was made 1-2 cm lateral to the midline on the more affected side and this was continued vertically over a distance of 1-2 mm from the midline pits. The lower end was fashioned from the midline in a V-shape in order to prevent a dog-ear deformity. The skin on this side of the natal cleft was then elevated and excised. The skin on the opposite side was undermined to the distance required to allow primary closure of the defect away from the midline without tension. Sinus tissue and its extensions were excised. The incision was then closed subcuticularly by absorbable polyglecaprone (3-0), after which a few interrupted mattress polyglecaprone (3-0) buttress sutures were also inserted.
Stage-IV
Midline pit/pits plus lateral extension in both directions. Rhomboid excision with the Limberg Flap will be performed.
Procedure: Rhomboid excision with the Limberg Flap
The area to be excised was mapped on the skin in a rhomboid form, and the flap was designed. The skin incision was deepened to the postsacral fascia. The flap was fully mobilized and transposed medially to fill the defect without tension. The wound was closed in two layers: the subcutaneous tissue with absorbable (2/0 polyglactin) sutures and the skin with nonabsorbable (3/0 polypropylene) interrupted mattress suture
Stage-R
Recurrent PSD following any type of treatment. Other flap techniques such as V-Y advancement flap, Z-Plasty will be performed.
Procedure: Bascom Cleft Lift
The upper end of the incision was made 1-2 cm lateral to the midline on the more affected side and this was continued vertically over a distance of 1-2 mm from the midline pits. The lower end was fashioned from the midline in a V-shape in order to prevent a dog-ear deformity. The skin on this side of the natal cleft was then elevated and excised. The skin on the opposite side was undermined to the distance required to allow primary closure of the defect away from the midline without tension. Sinus tissue and its extensions were excised. The incision was then closed subcuticularly by absorbable polyglecaprone (3-0), after which a few interrupted mattress polyglecaprone (3-0) buttress sutures were also inserted.
Procedure: Rhomboid excision with the Limberg Flap
The area to be excised was mapped on the skin in a rhomboid form, and the flap was designed. The skin incision was deepened to the postsacral fascia. The flap was fully mobilized and transposed medially to fill the defect without tension. The wound was closed in two layers: the subcutaneous tissue with absorbable (2/0 polyglactin) sutures and the skin with nonabsorbable (3/0 polypropylene) interrupted mattress suture
Procedure: Other flap techniques
Bascom Cleft lift as described above, Rhomboid excision with the Limberg Flap as described above, V-Y advancement flap, Z-Plasty

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early wound complications
Time Frame: up to 3 months
Complications were classified as infection (superficial or deep), collection (seroma or hematoma), wound dehiscence (partial or complete), or anesthesia-related complications. complications will be reviewed from time of surgery to the end of healing. percentage of participants with any wound complication will be evaluated as patients with complication.
up to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of recurrence (recurrence is defined when symptoms of the disease recurred after an interval following complete wound healing.)
Time Frame: 3 years
Patients will be followed up for recurrence for three years. Total number of patients presenting with recurrence will be evaluated at the end of 3rd year.
3 years
Primary healing rate
Time Frame: within 3 months
All surgical site complications were recorded, and patients with prolonged healing were regularly examined until complete healing was achieved. Primary healing was defined as no breakdown of the wound (complication-free healing) at any point along its length.
within 3 months
Hospital stay "The interval from the day of surgery to the day of discharge was recorded as the ''hospital stay.''
Time Frame: during first week (one week)
hospital stay for patients in postoperative period will be measured from the day of surgery to the day of discharge (as days).
during first week (one week)
Operative duration (''Operative duration'' is defined as the time between the initiation of the incision and the application of the last suture.)
Time Frame: during surgery
during surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Trabzon Numune Training and Research Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Karadeniz Technical University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 14, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • TrabzonNTRH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

because this is retrospective study.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings