Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Fixed-Dose Combination in Participants With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection

October 19, 2018 updated by: Gilead Sciences

A Phase 3, Open-label Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir Fixed Dose Combination for 12 Weeks in Subjects With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Infection

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) fixed-dose combination (FDC) for 12 weeks in participants with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
119

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation
        • Krasnoyarsk Regional Center of AIDS Prevention
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Central Research Institute of Epidemiology
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Central Scientific-Research Institute of Epidemiology
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • City Clinical Hospital # 24
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • First Moscow Medical University I.M.Sechenov.
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • First Moscow State Medical University I.M. Sechenov
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Limited Liability Company "Clinic Tour"
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Scientific Research Institute of Nutrition
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Sklifosovsky Scientific Research Institution of Emergency Care
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • North-Western state Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Kirov Medical Military Academy
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • LLC Medical Company "Hepatolog"
  • Sweden
      • Göteborg, Sweden
        • Sahlgrenska Universitetsjukhuset
      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • HCV RNA ≥ 10^4 IU/mL at screening
  • Chronic HCV infection (≥ 6 months) documented by prior medical history or liver biopsy

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any other chronic liver disease
  • Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Clinical hepatic decompensation
  • Prior exposure to SOF or other nucleotide analogue HCV NS5B inhibitor or any HCV NS5A inhibitor

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/ Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: SOF/VEL
SOF/VEL for 12 weeks
Drug: SOF/VEL
400/100 mg FDC tablet administered orally once daily
Other Names:
  • Epclusa®
  • GS-7977/GS-5816

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) 12 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR12)
Time Frame: Posttreatment Week 12
SVR12 was defined as HCV RNA < the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) at 12 weeks after stopping study treatment.
Posttreatment Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Permanently Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Up to 12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ at 4 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR4)
Time Frame: Posttreatment Week 4
SVR4 was defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ at 4 weeks after stopping study treatment.
Posttreatment Week 4
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ at 24 Weeks After Discontinuation of Therapy (SVR24)
Time Frame: Posttreatment Week 24
SVR24 was defined as HCV RNA < LLOQ at 24 weeks after stopping study treatment.
Posttreatment Week 24
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ on Treatment at Week 1
Time Frame: Week 1
Week 1
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ on Treatment at Week 2
Time Frame: Week 2
Week 2
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ on Treatment at Week 4
Time Frame: Week 4
Week 4
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ on Treatment at Week 8
Time Frame: Week 8
Week 8
Percentage of Participants With HCV RNA < LLOQ on Treatment at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Week 1
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1); Week 1
Baseline (Day 1); Week 1
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Week 2
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1); Week 2
Baseline (Day 1); Week 2
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1); Week 4
Baseline (Day 1); Week 4
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Week 8
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1); Week 8
Baseline (Day 1); Week 8
Change From Baseline in HCV RNA at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1); Week 12
Baseline (Day 1); Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Virologic Failure
Time Frame: Up to Posttreatment Week 24

Virologic failure was defined as:

  • Breakthrough (confirmed HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ after having previously had HCV RNA < LLOQ while on treatment), or
  • Rebound (confirmed > 1 log10 IU/mL increase in HCV RNA from nadir while on treatment), or
  • Non-response (HCV RNA persistently ≥ LLOQ through 8 weeks of treatment), or
  • Relapse (HCV RNA ≥ LLOQ during the post-treatment period having achieved HCV RNA < LLOQ at end of treatment, confirmed with 2 consecutive values or last available post-treatment measurement)
Up to Posttreatment Week 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Gilead Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 4, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 26, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 30, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 19, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GS-US-342-1522
  • 2015-003001-42 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Qualified external researchers may request IPD for this study after study completion. For more information, please visit our website at http://www.gilead.com/research/disclosure-and-transparency.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

18 months after study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

A secured external environment with username, password, and RSA code.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings