Safety and Reactogenicity Study of GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Investigational Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine (GSK3003891A) in Healthy Women

May 29, 2018 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

An Observer-blind Safety and Reactogenicity Study to Assess GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) Biologicals' Investigational Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine (GSK3003891A) in Healthy Women

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and reactogenicity of a single intramuscular dose of GSK Biologicals' investigational RSV vaccine, in healthy, non-pregnant women aged 18 to 45 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Wilrijk, Belgium, 2610
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the subject prior to performing any study specific procedure.
  • Non-pregnant female between, and including, 18 and 45 years of age at the time of vaccination.
  • Healthy subjects as established by medical history and clinical examination before entering into the study.
  • Female subjects of non-childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study.

  • Female subjects of childbearing potential may be enrolled in the study, if the subject:

    • has practiced adequate contraception for 30 days prior to vaccination, and
    • has a negative pregnancy test on the day of vaccination and
    • has agreed to continue adequate contraception during the entire study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product other than the study vaccine within 30 days prior to study vaccination, or planned use during the study period.
  • Concurrently participating in another clinical study, at any time during the study period, in which the subject has been or will be exposed to an investigational or a non-investigational vaccine/product.
  • Chronic administration of immunosuppressants or other immune-modifying drugs, as well as administration of long-acting immune-modifying drugs during the period starting 6 months prior to study vaccination, or planned administration during the study period. Inhaled and topical steroids are allowed.
  • Administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products during the period starting 3 months before study vaccination or planned administration during the study period.
  • Planned administration/administration of a vaccine not foreseen by the study protocol in the period starting 30 days before and ending 30 days after the study vaccination, with the exception of any licensed influenza vaccine which may be administered ≥ 15 days before or after study vaccination.
  • Previous experimental vaccination against RSV.
  • Family history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • Any confirmed or suspected immunosuppressive or immunodeficient condition, based on medical history and physical examination.
  • History of or current auto-immune disease.
  • Acute or chronic, clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality as determined by physical examination and/or Medical History.
  • Lymphoproliferative disorder or malignancy within previous 5 years.
  • History of hypersensitivity after a previous dose of any tetanus, diphtheria, or pertussis vaccine or to any component of Boostrix.
  • History of encephalopathy of unknown aetiology occurring within 7 days following a previous vaccination with pertussis-containing vaccine.
  • History of any neurological disorders or seizures.
  • History of transient thrombocytopenia or neurological complications following a previous vaccination against diphtheria and/or tetanus.
  • History of any reaction or hypersensitivity likely to be exacerbated by any component of the study vaccines.
  • Hypersensitivity to latex.
  • Any medical condition that in the judgment of the investigator would make intramuscular injection unsafe.
  • Current chronic alcohol consumption and/or drug abuse.
  • Acute disease and/or fever at the time of enrolment.
  • Body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2.
  • Pregnant or lactating female.
  • Planned move to a location that will prohibit participating in the trial until study end.
  • Any other condition that the investigator judges may interfere with study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: RSV group
Subjects in this group will receive a single dose of the RSV vaccine.
Biological: RSV vaccine GSK3003891A
Single dose administered intramuscularly at Day 0 in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Boostrix group
Subjects in this group will receive a single dose of Boostrix.
Biological: Boostrix
Single dose administered intramuscularly at Day 0 in the deltoid region of the non-dominant arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Biochemical Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 7
Among analysed biochemical parameters were alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and creatinine [CRE]. Biochemical value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0.
At Day 7
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Biochemical Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 30
Among analysed biochemical parameters were alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and creatinine [CRE]. Biochemical value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0.
At Day 30
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 7
Among analysed haematological parameters were eosinophils [EOS], haemoglobin [Hgb], leukocytes (white blood cells) [WBC], lymphocytes [LYM], neutrophils [NEU] and platelets [PLT]. Haematological value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0. This outcome presents values for EOS, Hgb and WBC.
At Day 7
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 30
Among analysed haematological parameters were eosinophils [EOS], haemoglobin [Hgb], leukocytes (white blood cells) [WBC], lymphocytes [LYM], neutrophils [NEU] and platelets [PLT]. Haematological value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0. This outcome presents values for EOS, Hgb and WBC.
At Day 30
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 7
Among analysed haematological parameters were eosinophils [EOS], haemoglobin [Hgb], leukocytes (white blood cells) [WBC], lymphocytes [LYM], neutrophils [NEU] and platelets [PLT]. Haematological value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0. This outcome presents values for LYM, NEU and PLT
At Day 7
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Values.
Time Frame: At Day 30
Among analysed haematological parameters were eosinophils [EOS], haemoglobin [Hgb], leukocytes (white blood cells) [WBC], lymphocytes [LYM], neutrophils [NEU] and platelets [PLT]. Haematological value ranges assessed were below, within or above, as compared to baseline at Day 0. This outcome presents values for LYM, NEU and PLT.
At Day 30
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Biochemical Laboratory Parameter Values by Maximum Grading
Time Frame: From Day 7 up to Day 30
Among biochemical parameters tested were ALT, AST and CRE, graded by FDA toxicity grading for biochemistry parameters. Assessed grades were unknown, grade 0 [G0], grade 1 [G1] (mild), grade 2 [G2] (moderate), grade 3 [G3] (severe) and grade 4 [G4] (potentially life threatening), as compared to baseline at Day 0.
From Day 7 up to Day 30
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Parameter Values by Maximum Grading
Time Frame: From Day 7 up to Day 30
Among haematological parameters tested were EOS, decreased Hgb and LYM graded by FDA toxicity grading for haematology parameters. Assessed grades were unknown, grade 0 [G0], grade 1 [G1] (mild), grade 2 [G2] (moderate), grade 3 [G3] (severe) and grade 4 [G4] (potentially life threatening), as compared to baseline at Day 0.
From Day 7 up to Day 30
Number of Subjects With Abnormal Haematological Laboratory Parameter Values by Maximum Grading
Time Frame: From Day 7 up to Day 30
Among haematological parameters tested were NEU, PLT, decreased WBC and increased WBC/I, graded by FDA toxicity grading for haematology parameters. Assessed grades were unknown, grade 0 [G0], grade 1 [G1] (mild), grade 2 [G2] (moderate), grade 3 [G3] (severe) and grade 4 [G4] (potentially life threatening), as compared to baseline at Day 0.
From Day 7 up to Day 30
Number of Subjects With Haematology Change From Baseline by Maximum Grade
Time Frame: From Day 7 up to Day 30
Assessed laboratory parameter changed from baseline was haemoglobin (Hgb). FDA grading for Hgb (change from baseline) was not applicable a baseline.
From Day 7 up to Day 30
Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms
Time Frame: During a 7-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 6) after vaccination
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness and swelling. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 100 millimetres (mm) of injection site. All solicited local symptoms are considered as related to the vaccination.
During a 7-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 6) after vaccination
Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms
Time Frame: During a 7-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 6) after vaccination
Assessed solicited general symptoms were fatigue, temperature (defined as oral temperature equal to or above [≥] 37.5 degrees Celsius [°C] for oral, axillary or tympanic route), gastrointestinal symptoms (gastro) including nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and/or abdominal pain; and headache. Any = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade and relationship to the vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptom that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever ≥ 39.5 °C. Related = symptom assessed by the investigator as related to the vaccination.
During a 7-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 6) after vaccination
Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: During a 30-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 29) after vaccination
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset out-side the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.
During a 30-day follow-up period (from Day 0 to Day 29) after vaccination
Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: From vaccination (Day 0) up to study end (Day 30)
Serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed include medical occurrences that result in death, are life threatening, require hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or result in disability/incapacity.
From vaccination (Day 0) up to study end (Day 30)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 28, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 28, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 29, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 204813
  • 2015-005742-58 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings