Bupivacaine Pharmacokinetics in Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block.

April 26, 2016 updated by: Leonardo Henrique Cunha Ferraro, Federal University of São Paulo

A Clinical and Pharmacokinetic Study to Evaluate the Influence of Two Bupivacaine Concentrations on Peak Plasma After Ultrasound-guided Axillary Brachial Plexus Block

Introduction: The risk of systemic toxicity when using bupivacaine is a persistent problem, making its pharmacokinetic study crucial to the safety of regional anesthesia (RA). Little evidence exists regarding the effect of different concentrations of this drug on peak plasma levels. The present study compares two bupivacaine concentrations to establish how the concentration and exchange area affect the peak plasma level of this drug during axillary brachial plexus block. Latency and postoperative analgesia periods were also compared.

Methods: 32 patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In the 0.25% group, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected per nerve; in the 0.5% group, 5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was injected per nerve. Peripheral blood samples were collected every 15 min during the first hour and every 30 min during the second hour to establish serum level dosage. High-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry was used for the analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • candidates for elective surgery of the distal forearm and hand for whom brachial plexus anesthesia and analgesia were indicated.
  • physical status of I or II according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) criteria
  • body mass index (BMI) of less than 35 kg/m2
  • Signed the free and informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive impairment
  • infection at the block puncture site
  • coagulopathy
  • history of bupivacaine allergy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bupivacaine 0,25%
Routine surgical procedure monitoring with an electrocardiogram, sphygmomanometer, and pulse oximeter was performed. One experienced anesthesiologist performed an ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block (S Series, FUJIFILM Sonosite, Seattle, USA) with the patient in the supine position. Local anesthetic injection was performed on each nerve identified in this pathway (i.e., the radial nerve, the ulnar nerve, the median nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve) In the group bupicavaine 0.25%, 10 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was injected into each nerve, for a total of 40 ml per patient.
Drug: Bupivacaine 0,25%
Venous blood samples were collected prior to blocking , every 15 min during the first hour after completion of the blocking and every 30 min during the second hour after completion using an exclusive cannula. Then, 5 ml was drawn off and was stored in two EDTA tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The EDTA tubes were centrifuged at 3,500xg for 10 min to obtain the blood plasma. This plasma was then stored in cryogenic tubes in a freezer at -80 °C until the time of the analysis. A high-performance liquid chromatography apparatus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a Bruker mass spectrometer (MS), model Amazon (USA), with electrospray source ionization and a sequential mass spectrometry system (MS/MS) were used for the analysis. After obtaining the precursor ion, a fragment was obtained via a collision-induced dissociation process. The following molecular ions were selected: 289.0 m/z==>140.1 m/z. The methodology was validated according to the international FDA recommendations.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Bupivacaine 0,5%
Routine surgical procedure monitoring with an electrocardiogram, sphygmomanometer, and pulse oximeter was performed. One experienced anesthesiologist performed an ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block (S Series, FUJIFILM Sonosite, Seattle, USA) with the patient in the supine position. Local anesthetic injection was performed on each nerve identified in this pathway (i.e., the radial nerve, the ulnar nerve, the median nerve, and the musculocutaneous nerve). In the group bupivacaine 0.5% , 5 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine was injected into each nerve, for a total of 20 ml per patient.
Drug: Bupivacaine 0,5%
Venous blood samples were collected prior to blocking , every 15 min during the first hour after completion of the blocking and every 30 min during the second hour after completion using an exclusive cannula. Then, 5 ml was drawn off and was stored in two EDTA tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The EDTA tubes were centrifuged at 3,500xg for 10 min to obtain the blood plasma. This plasma was then stored in cryogenic tubes in a freezer at -80 °C until the time of the analysis. A high-performance liquid chromatography apparatus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a Bruker mass spectrometer (MS), model Amazon (USA), with electrospray source ionization and a sequential mass spectrometry system (MS/MS) were used for the analysis. After obtaining the precursor ion, a fragment was obtained via a collision-induced dissociation process. The following molecular ions were selected: 289.0 m/z==>140.1 m/z. The methodology was validated according to the international FDA recommendations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Peak Venous Plasma level of bupivacaine.
Time Frame: 2 hours
The aim of this study was to evaluate the difference in peak plasma levels obtained after ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block using two different bupivacaine concentrations to maintain the infused mass. Venous blood samples were collected prior to blocking , every 15 min during the first hour after completion of the blocking and every 30 min during the second hour after completion using an exclusive cannula. Then, 5 ml was drawn off and was stored in two EDTA tubes (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). The EDTA tubes were centrifuged at 3,500xg for 10 min to obtain the blood plasma. This plasma was then stored in cryogenic tubes in a freezer at -80 °C until the time of the analysis. A high-performance liquid chromatography apparatus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to a Bruker mass spectrometer (MS), model Amazon (USA), with electrospray source ionization and a sequential mass spectrometry system (MS/MS) were used for the analysis.
2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Latency - The latency period was defined as the time interval between time zero and the time when surgical anesthesia was obtained.
Time Frame: 30 minutes
This evaluation occurred every 5 min until the 30th min after blocking. During this period, if surgical anesthesia was not obtained, then a complementary bupivacaine injection was administered distal to the axilla and the patient was excluded from the protocol. Surgical anesthesia was defined as a motor scale of 2 or lower; an absence of cold and pinprick sensation.
30 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of São Paulo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Leonardo HC Ferraro, PhD, Federal University of São Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 29, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Bupvacaine Pharmacokinetic

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings