Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients (POINCARE)

September 21, 2020 updated by: Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Effects of Fluid Balance Control in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Randomized Study

Most ICU patients develop a positive fluid balance, mainly during the two first weeks of their stay. The causes are multifactorial: a reduced urine output subsequent to shock state, positive pressure mechanical ventilation, acute renal failure, post-operative period of major surgical procedures, and simultaneous fluid loading to maintain volemia and acceptable arterial pressure. Additionally, the efficacy of fluid loading is frequently suboptimal, in relation to severe hypoalbuminemia and inflammatory capillary leakage. This results usually in a cumulated positive fluid balance of more than 10 litres at the end of the first week of stay. A high number of studies have showed that such a positive fluid balance was an independent factor of worse prognosis in selected populations of ICU patients: acute renal failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis, post-operative of high risk surgery. However, little is known about the putative causal role of positive fluid balance by itself on outcome. However, in two randomized controlled studies in patients with ARDS, a strategy of fluid balance control has been demonstrated to reduce time under mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay with no noticeable adverse effects. Although avoiding fluid overload is now recommended in ARDS management, there is no evidence that this approach would be beneficial in a more general population of ICU patients (i.e. with sepsis, acute renal failure, mechanical ventilation). In addition, fluid restriction -mainly if applied early could be deleterious in reducing both tissue oxygen delivery and perfusion pressure. There is a place for a prospective study comparing a "conventional" attitude based on liberal fluid management throughout the ICU stay with a restrictive approach aiming at controlling fluid balance, at least as soon as the patient circulatory status is stabilized. The latter approach would use a simple algorithm using fluid restriction and diuretics based on daily weighing, a common procedure in the ICU, probably more reliable than cumulative measurement of fluid movements in patients whose limits have been underlined.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1411

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Belfort, France, 90000
        • Hôpital Nord Franche-Comté
      • Dijon, France, 21000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire
      • Metz, France, 57000
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional
      • Nancy, France, 54000
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional Et Universitaire
      • Paris, France, 75000
        • Groupe Hospitalier Saint Joseph
      • Poissy, France, 78303
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional Et Universitaire
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • CentreHospitalier Régional et universitaire
      • Thionville, France, 57000
        • Centre Hospitalier Regional
      • Verdun, France, 55100
        • Centre Hospitalier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under mechanical ventilation, admitted for > 48h and <72h and no discharge planned for the next 24h

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Failure to weigh the patient
  • Multiple trauma
  • Transfer from another ICU with a previous stay > 24h
  • High probability of withdrawing treatment for ethical purposes within 7 days
  • Pregnancy
  • Patient refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control
Usual care provided according to the ward policy. Patients have to be weighed at least on admission (day 0), day 7 and day 14.
Experimental: Strategy
Patients have to be weighed every day. Use of an algorithm based on weight changes from day 2 to day 14 in order to reduce weight gain (fluid overload) using diuretics, fluid restriction,albumin, and ultrafiltration (the latter when ongoing renal replacement)
Drug: diuretics
Used to reduce fluid overload as evidenced by weight gain
Other Names:
  • furosemide
  • hydrochlorothiazide
  • bumetanide
Drug: albumin
Used to reduce fluid overload in addition with diuretics in hypoalbuminemic patients
Other: fluid restriction
Used to reduce fluid overload
Device: renal replacement
Used to reduce fluid overload in patients with renal replacement
Other Names:
  • ultrafiltration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality at 60 days after inclusion
Time Frame: 60 days
Vital status collected 60 days after admission; if the patient was dead at the time of assessment, date of death was collected
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fluid balance control at day 7
Time Frame: 7 days
Mean differences of patient body weight between Day 7 and admission (Day 0)
7 days
Fluid balance control at day 14
Time Frame: 14 days
Mean differences of patient body weight between Day 14 and admission (Day 0)
14 days
All-cause mortality at 28-day after inclusion
Time Frame: 28 days
Vital status collected 28 days after admission
28 days
All-cause in-hospital mortality
Time Frame: Up to 24 weeks
Death during the hospital stay where the patient was included in the study
Up to 24 weeks
All-cause mortality at 365 days after inclusion
Time Frame: 365 days
Vital status collected one year after admission
365 days
Survival time period at Day 60
Time Frame: 60 days
Time-related mortality, calculated from admission to the date of death
60 days
Survival time period at Day 365
Time Frame: 365 days
Time-related mortality, calculated from admission to the date of death
365 days
Global end-organ damage assessment
Time Frame: 28 days
Time-related changes of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA score): SOFA is a score of organ failure with 6 subscales on organ dysfunction: respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular,hepatic,renal and coagulation. Each ranges from 0 to 4 and the total SOFA score is the sum of each subscale ; increasing severity from 0 (normal) to 24(moribund). Values of SOFA score are tightly correlated with mortality.
28 days
Dependence on vasopressor drugs
Time Frame: 28 days
Cumulated number of vasopressor-free days alive from day 0 to day 28
28 days
Dependence on mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: 28 days
Cumulated number of ventilator-free days alive from day 0 to day 28
28 days
Dependence on renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: 60 days
Cumulated number of renal replacement-free days alive from day 0 to day 60
60 days
Cumulated number of pre-defined adverse events
Time Frame: 14 days
Pre-defined adverse events include Systolic arterial pressure< 90 mm Hg, kalemia < 2,8 ,mmol/L, natremia >155 mmol/L, "injury" level of renal dysfunction (RIFLE scale), acute ischemic events (myocardial infarction, mesenteric ischemia)
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ministry of Health, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: El Mehdi SIAGHY, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 31, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 25, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 22, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-A00662-47

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Care

Clinical Trials on diuretics

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings