Comparison of Picosecond and Q-switched Laser for Benign Pigmented Lesions Treatment

September 19, 2016 updated by: Woraphong Manuskiatti, M.D., Mahidol University

The Comparison of Picosecond 532 and 1,064 Nanometers Laser and Q-switched Nd:YAG 532 and 1,064 Nanometers Laser in the Treatment of Benign Pigmented Lesions: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of picosecond 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions compared with q-switched 532 and 1,064 nanometers laser.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Benign pigmented lesions can be divided into epidermal lesions such as freckles, lentigines, solar lentigines or cafe au lait macules and dermal lesions such as Nevus of Ota or Hori's nevus.

Q-switched 532 and 1064 nm lasers were reported to be safe and effective in the treatment of these benign pigmented lesions. By using selective photothermolysis theory, both q-switched 532 and 1064 nm lasers target on melanin causes photomechanical destruction of the melanin. However, the occurrence of post inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) were reported especially in patients with darker skin type.

Recently, picosecond 532, 755, 1064 nm laser was reported to treat benign pigmented lesions effectively. With their ultra short pulse duration (picosecond domain), it is ideally believed to be pure photomechanical effects without thermal injury to surrounding tissue. As a result, the incident of PIH should be reduced.

The investigators then aimed to compared the efficacy and efficacy of different pulse duration between nanosecond and picosecond laser in the treatment of benign pigmented lesions.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D.
  • Phone Number: 66-2419-9922
  • Email: siwmn@mahidol.ac.th

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10700
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Woraphong - Manuskiatti, Prof.,M.D.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Chanida - Ungaksornpairote, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age >18
  • having any benign pigmented lesions on both sides of the face or any tattoo on any part of body which would like to be removed
  • Fitzpatrick skin phototype 3-5

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously treated with any laser within 3 months before enrollment into the study
  • Patients with lesions with any clinical suspicion of being pre-cancerous or skin malignancies of any kind
  • Patients who have photosensitive dermatoses
  • Pregnancy and lactation woman
  • Patients with wound infections (herpes, other) on the day of treatment
  • Patients with moderate and severe inflammatory acne, Immunosuppressed patients, history of vitiligo
  • Patients with unrealistic concerns/expectations and inability to do the appropriate post-operative care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Picosecond laser

The pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with picosecond laser.

For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval.

The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions
Device: Picosecond laser
Picosecond 532 and 1064 nm laser Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesions.
Active Comparator: Q-switched Nd:YAG laser

The pigmented lesions on this half-side of the face would be treated with q-switched Nd:YAG laser.

For epidermal lesions, 1 laser treatment would be performed. For dermal lesions, 5 laser treatments would be performed every 3 month-interval.

The wavelength of 532 or 1064 nm would be chosen for appropriate lesions
Device: Q-switched Nd:YAG laser
Q-switched Nd-YAG 532 and 1064 nm laser. Treatment of facial pigmented lesions. The energy using depends on the endpoint of immediate whitening of the lesions. The wavelength using depends on the depth of lesion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Doctor evaluation of improvement using quartile scale
Time Frame: For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments
Quartile scale 0-4
For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Side effect occurrence
Time Frame: immediately after treatments, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks after the 1st laser treatment, and added more 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments for dermal lesions
immediately after treatments, 2, 3, 4, and 12 weeks after the 1st laser treatment, and added more 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments for dermal lesions
Patients evaluation of improvement using quartile scale
Time Frame: For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments
For epidermal lesion: 1 and 3 months after 1 laser treatment. For dermal lesion: 1, 3 and 6 months after 5 laser treatments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mahidol University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Woraphong Manuskiatti, Prof., M.D., Department of Dermatology, Siriraj Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 15, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 20, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Si468/2016 (EC1)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Benign Pigmented Lesions

Clinical Trials on Picosecond laser

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings