Study of Myocardial Contractility After Cardiac Surgery Under an Anterograde or Retrograde Cardioplegia

November 20, 2017 updated by: Pierre Wauthy, Brugmann University Hospital

Myocardial protection is a fundamental element for the safety of patients when performing cardiac surgery. For this purpose, cardioplegia were rapidly established in clinical practice to protect the myocardium when performing aortic clamp.

Cardioplegia are procedures to stop the contraction of myocardium. It is usually achieved with the use of chemicals ( cardioplegic solutions) or cold temperature (such as chilled perfusate). The composition of the cardioplegic solutions and their method of administration continuously changed over the years.

At the present date, cold blood cardioplegias are performed in the investigator's center. The investigators regularly use two modes of administration: either by an antegrade path (injection in the coronary arteries), or a retrograde one (injection in the venous system). At present, there are no elements supporting the superiority or inferiority of one path compared to another. The difficulty lies within a clear estimation of the contractility state of the ventricular cardiac muscle.

Technological developments in recent years provided a solution to this problem. The analysis of the pressure/volume curves generated by a ventricle allows an accurate quantification of the myocardial contractility. This requires the use of conductance catheters to accurately measure the ventricular volume and the ventricular pressure. The absolute ventricular contractility is then deduced with the help of a software.

The investigators intend to use this pressure-volume loops, obtained with conductance catheters, to compare the contractility of the right heart ventricle after antegrade vs retrograde cardioplegia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Brussels, Belgium, 1020
        • CHU Brugmann

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Need for myocardial revascularisation
  • Normal FEVG ( > 50%)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Valvulopathy
  • Associated procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Antegrade Cardioplegia
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (FEVG)
Procedure: Antegrade cardioplegia
Injection of the cardioplegia in the coronary arteries
Experimental: Retrograde Cardioplegia
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery in patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (FEVG)
Procedure: Retrograde cardioplegia
Injection of the cardioplegia in the venous system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contractility index of the right ventricle
Time Frame: Baseline
Cardiac surgery is performed according to the standard of care. The intraventricular pressure and the ventricular volume, measured with a conductance catheter, are combined within a software to compute the contractility index of the right ventricle. The baseline measure will be performed before the instauration of the extracorporeal blood circulation, during the cardiac surgery.
Baseline
Contractility index of the right ventricle
Time Frame: immediately after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation (end of cardiac surgery according to standard of care - up to 4h)
Cardiac surgery is performed according to the standard of care. The intraventricular pressure and the ventricular volume, measured with a conductance catheter, are combined within a software to compute the contractility index of the right ventricle. This will be measured at the end of the cardiac surgery, immediately after discontinuation of the extracorporeal circulation, with absence of inotropic support.
immediately after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation (end of cardiac surgery according to standard of care - up to 4h)
Contractility index of the right ventricle
Time Frame: 10 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation
Cardiac surgery is performed according to the standard of care. The intraventricular pressure and the ventricular volume, measured with a conductance catheter, are combined within a software to compute the contractility index of the right ventricle. This will be measured at the end of the cardiac surgery, 10 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal circulation, with absence of inotropic support.
10 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation
Contractility index of the right ventricle
Time Frame: 20 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation
Cardiac surgery is performed according to the standard of care. The intraventricular pressure and the ventricular volume, measured with a conductance catheter, are combined within a software to compute the contractility index of the right ventricle. This will be measured at the end of the cardiac surgery, 20 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal circulation, with absence of inotropic support.
20 minutes after discontinuation of the extracorporeal blood circulation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Troponin post operative level
Time Frame: 6h post surgery
The investigators would like to measure post operative troponin levels as a biological marker of myocardial protection
6h post surgery
Troponin post operative level
Time Frame: 12h post surgery
The investigators would like to measure post operative troponin as a biological marker of myocardial protection.
12h post surgery
Troponin post operative level
Time Frame: 24h post surgery
The investigators would like to measure post operative troponin as a biological marker of myocardial protection.
24h post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Brugmann University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre Wauthy, MD, Pr, CHU Brugmann
  • Principal Investigator: Alessandro Falchetti, MD, CHU Brugmann

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CHUB-Retroplegie

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings