Better Arterial Cannulation Technique With Different Hemodynamics (CCURDS)
Comparison of Conventional and Ultrasound Guided Techniques of Radial Artery Cannulation in Different Hemodynamic Subsets: a Randomized Controlled Study
Purpose Two techniques of radial artery cannulation, ultrasound guided (USG) and conventional method (CM) were compared to find the better technique in general and in different hemodynamic subsets of patients.
Method This is a prospective randomized, single center study of 100 patients. The details of the primary cannulation technique, number of attempts, time taken, failure and cross-over technique were recorded for three different hemodynamic subsets with Systolic blood pressure <80 mm hg, 80-100 mm hg and > 100 mm hg.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All adult Patients worthy of radial artery cannulation, who consented
Exclusion Criteria:
- No consent
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional method (CM)
Radial artery cannulation has been done using the conventional method.
Cannulation failure with this technique were tried with USG technique secondarily.
|
Radial artery cannulation done with conventional and ultrasound guidance in two respective groups of patients and their first pass success and ultimate success rates compared in different hemodynamic subsets of the patients.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Ultrasound guided method (USG)
Radial artery cannulation is done with ultrasound guidance for this group of patients.
Cannulation failure with this technique were tried with Conventional technique secondarily.
|
Radial artery cannulation done with conventional and ultrasound guidance in two respective groups of patients and their first pass success and ultimate success rates compared in different hemodynamic subsets of the patients.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
First pass success rate
Time Frame: 1 year
|
First pass success rate depicted the better method of cannulation of radial artery
|
1 year
|
|
Final/ultimate success rate of an intervention
Time Frame: 1 year
|
If the primary technique failed then the cannulation was done with the secondary technique and hence the final success rate was calculated for each of the techniques: conventional and ultrasound guided.
|
1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time taken for the respective technique
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Time taken for each technique was calculated from start of needle insertion till the cannula was completely inserted.
The time was compared between the two arms
|
1 year
|
|
Attempts of cannulation
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Number of attempts made by a technique was recorded and compared
|
1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MREC#644
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.