Coronary Calcium Scoring Versus Standard Care for Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients

September 14, 2023 updated by: Montefiore Medical Center

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Coronary Calcium Scoring and Standard Care in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients

This research asks whether coronary calcium scoring, a non-invasive test based on computed tomography scanning, is a better way to diagnose chest pain patients than other currently used methods. Three of four patients will undergo calcium scoring and the remaining patients will receive standard care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10461
        • Montefiore Medical Center - Einstein Division
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Montefiore Medical Center - Wakefield Division

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • complaint of chest pain or pressure
  • intermediate risk by HEART score
  • clinical indication for non-invasive cardiac imaging
  • free of known coronary artery disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hemodynamic instability
  • electrocardiogram suggestive of acute ischemia or myocardial infarction
  • unremitting chest pain
  • serum troponin levels greater than three times the laboratory threshold
  • unable to give his/her own written, informed consent
  • pregnant women
  • weight > 182 kg
  • unable to lie supine for scan
  • coronary calcium score, coronary CTA or non-contrast thoracic CT within the last year and available for review
  • unable to comply with 30 day follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Coronary Calcium Scoring
Coronary calcium scoring by multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT).
Device: Coronary Calcium Scoring
Scan with 64-detector row or better CT scanners with quantification by the Agatston method.
Other Names:
  • CCS
  • Calcium Score
  • Calcium Scoring
  • Coronary Calcium Score
  • CACS
Active Comparator: Standard Care
Standard evaluation of chest pain patient which often includes immediate non-invasive imaging.
Procedure: Standard Care
Routine clinical monitoring of chest pain patients. Any of a number of non-invasive cardiac tests such as coronary CT angiography, stress echocardiography and stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging may be performed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: 30 days
number of patients with death, non-fatal heart attack, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal cardiac arrest
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Length of Stay
Time Frame: through completion of emergency department stay for each patient, an average of six hours and through completion of hospitalization, an average of two days
emergency department and inpatient
through completion of emergency department stay for each patient, an average of six hours and through completion of hospitalization, an average of two days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
number of patients with death, non-fatal heart attack, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal cardiac arrest
minimum of 6 months
Repeat emergency department visits and hospitalizations
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
number of patients with return visits to the emergency department and hospitalizations after the end of the recruitment visit
minimum of 6 months
Subsequent non-invasive cardiac imaging
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
number of patients with subsequent stress testing and computed tomography of the heart
minimum of 6 months
Subsequent coronary catheterization
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
number of patients with subsequent conventional angiography of the heart
minimum of 6 months
Subsequent percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularization
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
number of patients with subsequent coronary angioplasty, coronary stenting and bypass surgery
minimum of 6 months
Total effective radiation dose
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
effective radiation dose estimated for procedures involving ionizing radiation
minimum of 6 months
The number of patients reporting changes in aspirin pharmacotherapy
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
patients with new prescriptions for or increased dose of aspirin
minimum of 6 months
The number of patients reporting changes in anti-lipid pharmacotherapy
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
patients with new prescriptions for or increased dose of lipid lowering medication
minimum of 6 months
The number of patients reporting persistent chest pain on telephone questionnaire
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
how many patients report continued chest pain symptoms at follow-up
minimum of 6 months
The number of patients with incidental findings due to imaging and the types of findings
Time Frame: minimum of 6 months
how many patients had incidental findings on their heart imaging scans
minimum of 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Montefiore Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey M Levsky, MD, PhD, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 14, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 14, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 15, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 7, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 12, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 14, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-4993

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings