Prediction of Relapse Risk in Stable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (PRESS)

September 30, 2022 updated by: Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Evaluation and Prediction of Relapse Risk After Glucocorticoid Withdrawal in Patients With Stable Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: An Open-labeled Multi-centric Randomized Controlled Study From China

Whether and when systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with stable disease should withdraw glucocorticoid (GC)? How about the relapse risk? What are the risk factors for disease flare? All the above are unclear. Long-course GC treatment has a lot of side-effects even in a sustaining low dose. The aim of this study is to explore the relapse risk after GC withdrawal in SLE patients with stable disease more than one year and to establish a predictive model for flare risk stratification.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease with a relapsing-remitting course. For patients in remission, glucocorticoid (GC) is used to be maintained in a low dose for a long time in fear of disease flare. Long-term GC could bring a lot of side-effects even in a low dose. Whether and when patients with stable disease should withdraw GC? How about the relapse risk? What are the risk factors for disease flare? All the above remain unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the relapse risk after GC withdrawal in SLE patients with stable disease and to establish a predictive model for risk stratification. Meanwhile the investigators aim to testify the effects of hydroxychloroquine in preventing SLE relapse. This study is an open-labeled randomized controlled clinical trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
333

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Anhui
      • Hefei, Anhui, China, 230001
        • Anhui Provincial Hospital
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    • Hunan
      • Changsha, Hunan, China, 410008
        • Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
    • Liaoning
      • Shenyang, Liaoning, China, 110004
        • Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University
    • Xinjiang
      • Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 830001
        • People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • SLE diagnosis fulfilled the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinic revision of the American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for SLE
  • Disease stabilized ≥ 1 year
  • SELENA-SLEDAI ≤ 3
  • Anti-double strand DNA negative by IF measurement and ≤ 200IU/ml by ELISA method
  • Complement 3 (C3) ≥ 0.5*lower limit of the normal range, and fluctuation of the C3 is less than 10% within the last year
  • 24 hour urine protein ≤ 0.5g
  • Prednisone (or equivalent) ≤ 7.5mg/d for more than 6 months
  • No use of immunosuppressants including CsA, MMF, CTX, FK506, LEF, MTX in recent 6 months. But hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is permitted and should be in use
  • Never use biologic agents including Rituximab, Belimumab, Epratuzumab and so on
  • No severe organ involvement in recent 2 years including lupus encephalosis, diffused alveolar hemorrhage, thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura, rapid progressive glomerulonephritis, severe thrombocytopenia, severe hemolytic anemia, myocardial involvement, myeleterosis or severe peripheral neuropathy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active SLE
  • In pregnancy or breastfeeding, plan for pregnancy
  • Plan or has been on a surgery in recent 6 months
  • Current infection
  • History of malignancy
  • Severe organ dysfunction or other complications
  • Unable to follow up
  • Inappropriate to be enrolled
  • Psoriasis, porphyria, arrhythmia or eye diseases that contradict with HCQ usage

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Full withdrawal
Intervention: 'Drug free'.
Other: Drug free
Both Glucocorticoid(GC) and hydroxychloroquine(HCQ) treatment are stopped in stable SLE patients.
Experimental: GC withdrawal
Intervention: 'HCQ' .
Drug: HCQ
Glucocorticoid(GC) treatment is stopped in stable SLE patients. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is kept as 0.2-0.4g/d
Other Names:
  • Hydroxychloroquine
Experimental: No withdrawal
Intervention: 'GC+HCQ' .
Drug: GC+HCQ
Glucocorticoid(GC) is kept no more than 7.5mg/d. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is kept as 0.2-0.4g/d.
Other Names:
  • Glucocorticoid
  • Hydroxychloroquine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of subjects with mild to moderate Lupus flare evaluated by modified SELENA-SLEDAI flare index (SFI)
Time Frame: 33 weeks
The SFI includes three elements: the SELENA-SLEDAI score (range 0 ~105, with 0 indicating inactive disease and ); an assessment of new or worsening disease activity, medication changes, and hospitalizations that not captured with the use of the SLEDAI; and the score on the physician's global-assessment (PGA) visual-analogue scale (range, 0 to 3, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe); Mild to moderate flare by SFI is defined as appearance of one of the following: a change in SLEDAI>3 points but≤12 points; or new onset/worse of cutaneous/ mucosal injury (discoid, photosensitivity, profundus, cutaneous vasculitis, bullous lupus, Nasopharyngeal ulcers), serositis (pleuritis and/or pericarditis), arthritis, SLE associated fever; or the need to increase prednisone dosage to no more than 0.5 mg/kg/day; or the need to add hydroxychloroquine or NSAIDs with no increase in the dose GC; or an increment of PGA ranges from 1.0 to 2.5.
33 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of subjects with a SELENA-SLEDAI maintaining at <4 points
Time Frame: 33 weeks
33 weeks
Mean change in PGA
Time Frame: 33 weeks
The PGA is a visual analog scale scored from 0 to 3. A score of 1 corresponds to mild lupus disease activity; A score of 2 correlates with moderate disease activity and a score of 3 with severe disease activity
33 weeks
• Percent of subjects with at least one B in any system evaluated with The British Isles Lupus Activity Group (BILAG) scoring system
Time Frame: 33 weeks
BILAG includes 9 systems (constitutional, mucocutaneous, neuropsychiatric, musculoskeletal, cardiorespiratory, gastrointestinal, ophthalmic, renal and haematological). A to E scoring is based on the physician's intention to treat: Grade A: treatment requiring any of the following 1) high dose oral glucocorticoids, eg: prednisolone>20mg/day; 2) intravenous pulse glucocorticoids, eg: pulse methylprednisolone ≥ 500 mg；3)systemic immunomodulators (include biologicals, immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis)；4) therapeutic high dose anticoagulation, eg: warfarin INR 3 - 4; Grade B: treatment requiring any of the following treatment:1) low dose oral glucocorticoids, eg: prednisolone ≤ 20mg/day; 2) intramuscular or intra-articular or soft tissue glucocorticoids injection; 3) topical glucocorticoids;4) topical immunomodulators; 5) antimalarials or thalidomide;6) symptomatic therapy; eg: NSAIDs; Grade C: mild disease; Grade D: inactive now but previously affected; Grade E: systems never involved
33 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Shengjing Hospital
Beijing Hospital
People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region
Anhui Provincial Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Xuan Zhang, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital
  • Study Chair: Xuan Zhang, MD, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 25, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 3, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZS-906

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings