Epidural Injection of Corticosteroids Under USG (EICUS) (EICUS)
Comparative Study of the Use of Ultrasonography (USG) or Isolated Use of Fluoroscopy for Sacral Epidural Puncture Corticosteroid Infiltration in Patients With Low Back Pain by Canal Stenosis Lumbar
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Introduction: Procedures guided by ultrasound (USG) have advantages over traditional techniques (fluoroscopy) with respect to regional anesthesia. Some studies have shown its usefulness as a quick, safe and simple tool for the location of the sacral hiatus and to guide the puncture of the sacral epidural space in patients with chronic low back pain, despite the lack of data with respect to clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate qualitatively and quantitatively the pain control and incidence of adverse effects in patients undergoing corticosteroid infiltration and local anesthetic through sacral epidural puncture with ultrasound assistance or isolated use of fluoroscopy to aid puncture and location of the sacral epidural space. It will also be evaluated success rate in the first puncture, and the time duration of the procedure in groups.
METHODS: It is clinical, analytical, prospective trial, randomized, covered for evaluators. It will include 30 patients with chronic low back pain or pain in the lower limbs resulting in lumbar canal stenosis, refractory to medical treatment. A group will be submitted to epidural corticosteroid infiltration associated with local anesthetic with the use of fluoroscopy for locating the sacral epidural space, which is currently the gold standard for this technique, while in another location group will be held with the use of ultrasound.
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 05408000
- Shirley Andrade Santos
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Older than 18 years old;
- Patients who have low back and/or lower extremities due to lumbar spinal stenosis pain outpatients, with regular follow-up refractory to conservative medical treatment (Verbal Scale of Pain > 3, more three months duration, with no improvement with clinical treatment).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symptoms that characterize a surgical emergency;
- The presence of sensory or motor deficit (chronic mild motor impairment or mild paresthesia will not be deleted), injury to peripheral nerves, trauma history or recent fracture;
- Serious medical conditions or decompensated;
- Infection at the puncture site;
- Coagulopathy;
- Contrast allergy history or the medications used in the technique;
- Pregnancy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Ultrasound
The group I will be subjected to epidural infiltration using methylprednisolone acetate diluted in ropivacaine 0.1%.
Initially the sacral hiatus is identified by palpation.
After, the ultrasound device is used (USG) for the puncture, with a linear transducer of high frequency.
At the end of corticosteroid administration, the placement of the needle tip will be checked with fluoroscopy and noted.
|
Location and function of sacral epidural space with ultrasound
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Radioscopy
The group II will be subjected to infiltration using methylprednisolone acetate diluted in ropivacaine 0.1% .
However, only radioscopy be used to guide the puncture.
|
Location and puncture of the sacral epidural space only with fluoroscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain management
Time Frame: 1 year
|
After infiltration, the patient will be reassessed as to pain control in 15 days, 3, 6 and 12 months.
Pain is assessed using a verbal analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
Patients will quantify the pain at rest, improvement factors and worse, smaller and higher scores during the day, and average daily pain.
|
1 year
|
|
Satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: during the procedure
|
Satisfaction with the treatment of pain is assessed using a numerical scale from 0 to 10, 0 being unsatisfied and 10 being complete satisfaction.
|
during the procedure
|
|
Medications
Time Frame: 3 months
|
It will be noted and all medications used by the patient before the procedure, and their doses, repeating the notes after 3 months of follow-up after the block.
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Wallner T, Koinig H, Mayer N, Kapral S. Ultrasonographic guidance reduces the amount of local anesthetic for 3-in-1 blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):584-8. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90086-4.
- Chen CP, Tang SF, Hsu TC, Tsai WC, Liu HP, Chen MJ, Date E, Lew HL. Ultrasound guidance in caudal epidural needle placement. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):181-4. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00028.
- Marhofer P, Schrogendorfer K, Koinig H, Kapral S, Weinstabl C, Mayer N. Ultrasonographic guidance improves sensory block and onset time of three-in-one blocks. Anesth Analg. 1997 Oct;85(4):854-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199710000-00026.
- Manchikanti L, Knezevic NN, Boswell MV, Kaye AD, Hirsch JA. Epidural Injections for Lumbar Radiculopathy and Spinal Stenosis: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician. 2016 Mar;19(3):E365-410.
- Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Damron KS, Boswell MV. Effect of fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid or local anesthetic injections in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and radiculitis: a randomized, controlled, double blind trial with a two-year follow-up. Pain Physician. 2012 Jul-Aug;15(4):273-86.
- Blanchais A, Le Goff B, Guillot P, Berthelot JM, Glemarec J, Maugars Y. Feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided caudal epidural glucocorticoid injections. Joint Bone Spine. 2010 Oct;77(5):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.04.016. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 56795916.8.0000.0068
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.