A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-8E12 in Participants With Early Alzheimer's Disease

August 4, 2022 updated by: AbbVie

A Phase 2 Multiple Dose, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of ABBV-8E12 in Subjects With Early Alzheimer's Disease

This study seeks to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ABBV-8E12 in participants with early Alzheimer's disease (AD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
453

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Expanded Access

Expanded Access

A way for patients with serious diseases or conditions who cannot participate in a clinical trial to gain access to a medical product that has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Also called compassionate use. There are different expanded access types.
No longer available

No longer available

  • Available: Expanded access is currently available for this investigational treatment, and patients who are not participants in the clinical study may be able to gain access to the drug, biologic, or medical device being studied.
  • No longer available: Expanded access was available for this intervention previously but is not currently available and will not be available in the future.
  • Temporarily not available: Expanded access is not currently available for this intervention but is expected to be available in the future.
  • Approved for marketing: The intervention has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use by the public.
 outside the clinical trial. See expanded access record.

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
    • New South Wales
      • Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
        • The Kinghorn Cancer Centre /ID# 152632
    • Queensland
      • Southport, Queensland, Australia, 4222
        • Griffith University /ID# 152635
    • Victoria
      • Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
        • Austin Health /ID# 152637
      • Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 3050
        • The Royal Melbourne Hospital /ID# 202633
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • Australian Alzheimer's Res Fou /ID# 152634
      • West Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 6005
        • Neurodegenerative Disorders Research /ID# 152826
  • Belgium
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
        • Groupe Sante CHC - Clinique du MontLegia /ID# 152846
    • Bruxelles-Capitale
      • Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Bruxelles-Capitale, Belgium, 1200
        • UCL Saint-Luc /ID# 152847
    • Vlaams-Brabant
      • Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium, 3000
        • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven /ID# 152642
  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6C 0A7
        • Parkwood Institute /ID# 164204
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M3B 2S7
        • Toronto Memory Program /ID# 147863
  • Denmark
    • Hovedstaden
      • Copenhagen Ø, Hovedstaden, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet /ID# 153192
  • Finland
      • Kuopio, Finland, 70210
        • Ita-Suomen Yliopisto /ID# 152959
    • Varsinais-Suomi
      • Turku, Varsinais-Suomi, Finland, 20520
        • Clinical Research Services Turku /ID# 152845
  • Italy
      • Brescia, Italy, 25125
        • IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli /ID# 152395
      • Milan, Italy, 20122
        • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico /ID# 152401
      • Milano, Italy, 20162
        • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda /ID# 152391
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Modena, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 41126
        • AOU di Modena /ID# 152394
    • Lazio
      • Rome, Lazio, Italy, 00168
        • Policlinico Agostino Gemelli /ID# 152396
      • Rome, Lazio, Italy, 00185
        • Duplicate_AOU Policlinico Umberto I /ID# 163144
    • Umbria
      • Perugia, Umbria, Italy, 06129
        • Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia /ID# 152397
  • Netherlands
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584 CX
        • Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht /ID# 163576
  • New Zealand
      • Burwood, New Zealand, 8083
        • CGM Research Trust /ID# 152827
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08028
        • Fundacio ACE /ID# 152643
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona /ID# 152646
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario San Carlos /ID# 153703
      • Madrid, Spain, 28041
        • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre /ID# 152647
    • Pais Vasco
      • Donostia, Pais Vasco, Spain, 20009
        • Fundacion CITA Alzheimer Fundazioa /ID# 152645
  • Sweden
    • Stockholms Lan
      • Stockholm, Stockholms Lan, Sweden, 171 77
        • Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge /ID# 156705
    • Vastra Gotalands Lan
      • Molndal, Vastra Gotalands Lan, Sweden, 431 80
        • Sahlgrenska University Hospital Molndal /ID# 154465
  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Banner University of Arizona Medical Center Phoenix /ID# 151536
      • Sun City, Arizona, United States, 85351
        • Banner Sun Health Res Inst /ID# 151895
    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92614
        • Irvine Clinical Research /ID# 162331
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
        • Ucsd /Id# 152467
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94113
        • Ray Dolby Brain Health Center /ID# 154965
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143-2204
        • Univ California, San Francisco /ID# 152053
    • Florida
      • Delray Beach, Florida, United States, 33445
        • Brain Matters Research /ID# 147796
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33912
        • Neuropsychiatric Research Center of Southwest Florida /ID# 162332
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic /ID# 151236
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806-1044
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc. /ID# 147804
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33612
        • University of South Florida /ID# 151890
      • The Villages, Florida, United States, 32162-7116
        • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc /ID# 151633
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory Midtown Infectious Disease Clinic /ID# 151492
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30331
        • Atlanta Center for Medical Research /ID# 151550
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30030
        • NeuroStudies.net, LLC /ID# 152746
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60640
        • Great Lakes Clinical Trials /ID# 152754
      • Park Ridge, Illinois, United States, 60068
        • Advocate Lutheran General Hospital /ID# 152052
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62702
        • Southern IL Univ School of Med /ID# 151769
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University /ID# 151861
    • Kansas
      • Fairway, Kansas, United States, 66205
        • University of Kansas Medical Center - Alzheimer's Disease Center /ID# 151554
    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40536
        • University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center /ID# 152753
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Cnt /ID# 151893
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital /ID# 151770
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Physicians /ID# 151882
    • Mississippi
      • Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States, 39401
        • Hattiesburg Clinic /ID# 202388
    • New Jersey
      • Princeton, New Jersey, United States, 08540
        • Princeton Medical Institute /ID# 152934
    • New York
      • Laurelton, New York, United States, 11413
        • Scott Research Inc. /ID# 151880
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11040
        • North Shore University Hospital /ID# 151632
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710-3000
        • Duke Cancer Center /ID# 147828
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University /ID# 151690
    • Pennsylvania
      • Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, United States, 19462
        • Keystone Clinical Studies LLC /ID# 202305
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Rhode Island Hospital /ID# 151538
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-0011
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center /ID# 154547
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231-4316
        • Kerwin Research Center /ID# 147815
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Houston Methodist Hospital /ID# 154810
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77054
        • McGovern Medical School /ID# 204860
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112-5500
        • University of Utah /ID# 151858
    • Virginia
      • Alexandria, Virginia, United States, 22310
        • Integrated Neurology Services /ID# 154863

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject who meets the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) clinical criteria for mild cognitive impairment or probable AD, and have:

    • Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)-Global Score of 0.5
    • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 22 to 30, inclusive
    • Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status-Delayed Memory Index (RBANS - DMI) score of 85 or lower
  • Subject has a positive amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) scan.
  • Subject has a Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale (MHIS) score of ≤ 4.
  • The subject has an identified, reliable, study partner (e.g., family member).
  • If using medications to treat symptoms related to AD, doses must be stable for at least 12 weeks prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has any contraindications or inability to tolerate brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), PET scans or lumbar puncture.
  • Subject has evidence of any other clinically significant neurological disorder other than early AD.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, the subject has any clinically significant or uncontrolled medical or psychiatric illness, or has had an infection requiring medical intervention in the past 30 days.
  • Subject has had a myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack or required intervention for any of these conditions within 6 months of Screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo for ABBV-8E12 every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
Drug: placebo for ABBV-8E12
placebo solution for intravenous (IV) infusion
Experimental: ABBV-8E12 300 mg
ABBV-8E12 300 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
Drug: ABBV-8E12
ABBV-8E12 solution for IV infusion
Other Names:
  • Tilavonemab
Experimental: ABBV-8E12 1000 mg
ABBV-8E12 1000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
Drug: ABBV-8E12
ABBV-8E12 solution for IV infusion
Other Names:
  • Tilavonemab
Experimental: ABBV-8E12 2000 mg
ABBV-8E12 2000 mg every 4 weeks for 96 weeks
Drug: ABBV-8E12
ABBV-8E12 solution for IV infusion
Other Names:
  • Tilavonemab

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline Over Time in CDR-SB Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The CDR-SB is a numeric scale used to quantify the severity of symptoms of dementia. A qualified health professional assesses a participant's cognitive and functional performance in 6 areas: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care. The CDR scale gives a score from 0 to 3 for each of the 6 areas, with a lower value being desirable. The sum of these 6 areas, the CDR-SB score, can range from 0 to 18, with a lower value being desirable.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug plus 20 weeks (up to Week 112)
A TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) that began on or after the first study drug dose date and no more than 20 weeks after the last dose of study drug. An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious AEs (SAEs) were defined as an event that results in death, is life-threatening, results in hospitalization or prolongs hospitalization, is a congenital abnormality, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is an important medical event. Events were rated in severity as mild, moderate, or severe, and were categorized as having a reasonable possibility or no reasonable possibility of relationship to study drug.
From first dose of study drug up to last dose of study drug plus 20 weeks (up to Week 112)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Time to Cmax (Tmax) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Serum Concentration at the End of a Dose Interval (Ctrough) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Half-Life (T1/2) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Harmonic mean is presented in the data table.
Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Dosing (Time 0) to Day 28 (AUC0-28) for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Outcome Measure description above for complete time point details.
  • The AUC0-28 for Dose 1 included the following timepoints: pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 5, Day 15 and Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2).
  • The AUC0-28 for Dose 4 included the following timepoints: Day 85 pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 89, Day 99 and Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5).
Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Outcome Measure description above for complete time point details.
Cmax/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
Day 1 (Dose 1): Pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 minutes), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 5 and 15. Day 85 (Dose 4): Pre-infusion (0 hour), post-infusion (within 15 minutes) and 1 and 2 hours post-infusion; Days 89 and 99.
AUC0-28/Dose for ABBV-8E12 Over the Dosing Interval After the First and Fourth Doses
Time Frame: Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Outcome Measure description above for complete time point details.
  • The AUC0-28/dose for Dose 1 included the following timepoints: pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 5, Day 15 and Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2).
  • The AUC0-28/dose for Dose 4 included the following timepoints: Day 85 pre-infusion, post-infusion (within 15 min), 1 and 2 hours post-infusion, Day 89, Day 99 and Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5).
Day 1 (Dose 1): pre-infusion, up to Day 29 (trough level before Dose 2). Day 85 (Dose 4): pre-infusion, up to Day 113 (trough level before Dose 5). See Outcome Measure description above for complete time point details.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (14-Item) Cognition Portion (ADAS-Cog-14) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients. The Total Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 90, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Comprehension of Spoken Language Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Comprehension of Spoken Language score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Constructional Praxis Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Constructional Praxis Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Commands Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Commands Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Delayed Word Recall Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Delayed Word Recall Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Ideational Praxis Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Ideational Praxis Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Maze Task Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Maze Task Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Number Cancellation Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Number Cancellation Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Naming Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Naming Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5 with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Orientation Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Orientation Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recall - Number of Words Not Recalled Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Recall - Number of Words Not Recalled Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Remember Word Recognition Instructions Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Remember Word Recognition Instructions Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Spoken Language Ability Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Spoken Language Ability Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Find Difficulty Spontaneous Speech Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Find Difficulty Spontaneous Speech Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 5, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADAS-Cog-14 Word Recognition Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The ADAS-Cog was designed to assess the cognitive impairments most common in AD. The ADAS-Cog-14 includes the original 11 items from the ADAS-Cog-11 [1. Spoken language ability, 2. Comprehension of spoken language, 3. Recall of test instructions, 4. Word-findings difficulty in spontaneous speech, 5. Following commands, 6. Naming objects and fingers, 7. Constructional praxis, 8. Ideational praxis, 9. Orientation, 10. Word-recall task, 11. Word-recognition task] and includes 3 additional tasks [12. Number cancellation task, 13. Delayed word recall task, 14. Executive functioning], for increased sensitivity in MCI patients. The Word Recognition Score of the ADAS-Cog-14 ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score representing greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The FAQ measures level of assistance (functional disability) needed for carrying out instrumental activities in daily living (iADLs). The FAQ score ranges from 0 - 30 and consists of 10 items (each scored from 0 - 3), which measure a specific iADL in the past 4-weeks: [1) writing checks, paying bills, keeping financial records; 2) assembling tax or business records; 3) shopping alone; 4) playing a game of skill; 5) making coffee or tea; 6) preparing a balanced meal; 7) keeping track of current events; 8) attending to and understanding a television program, book, or magazine; 9) remembering appointments, family occasions, medications; and 10) traveling out of the neighborhood]. Performance in each category is rated from 0 - 3 as follows: 0 - normal; 1 - has difficulty, but does by self; 2 - requires assistance; or 3 - dependent. The FAQ was administered by a trained interviewer. Higher scores indicate a greater requirement of assistance.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Clinical Global Impression of Change for Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-CGIC-MCI) General Condition Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Cognition Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Behavior Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning. Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in ADCS-CGIC-MCI Functional Abilities Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The instrument assesses the physician's global impression of change in 4 major cognitive domains. The instrument covers 4 major domains: 1. General condition , 2. Cognition, 3. Behavior, and 4. Social and daily functioning (functional abilities). Scoring is based on a 7-point Likert Scale: 1, marked improvement; 2, moderate improvement; 3, minimal improvement; 4, no change; 5, minimal worsening; 6, moderate worsening; 7, marked worsening. Higher score indicates greater worsening.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in University of California's Performance Based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-Brief) - Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The UPSA-Brief is a performance-based instrument which uses a series of tasks and roleplay scenarios to evaluate a person's functional capacity in two areas of basic living skills (i.e., financial skills and communication skills). Scores range from 0 to 100; a higher score of the UPSA-Brief is desirable.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in 24-Item Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living Scale Adapted for Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment (ADCS-MCI-ADL-24) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
The ADCS-MCI-ADL-24 is a 24-item, study partner-based assessment of activities of daily living designed specifically for AD patients and is completed by a trained rater. The scale assesses functional activities such as cooking, household chores, shopping, keeping appointments, social interactions and hobbies. Items are assessed according to whether they were performed in the past 4 weeks and, if so, some items are further assessed as to whether they were performed independently, with supervision, or with physical help. Scores on the ADCS-ADL-MCI range from 0 to 69, where higher score indicates greater capability to carry out activities of daily living.
Baseline, Week 48, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) - Total Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. Total score can range from 40 to 160 with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Coding Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Coding Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 89, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Digit Span Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Digit Span Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 8, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Copy Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Figure Copy Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Figure Recall Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Figure Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 18, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recognition Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Recognition Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Learning Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Learning Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Line Orientation Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Line Orientation Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 20, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - List Recall Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The List Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Picture Naming Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Picture Naming Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Semantic Fluency Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Semantic Fluency Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 40, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Memory Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Story Memory Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 24, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in RBANS - Story Recall Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The RBANS is a 25-minute, standardized neurocognitive battery with North American population-based normative data. The RBANS measures five neurocognitive domains, with age-based scaling. Twelve subtests measure cognitive decline or improvement across the following domains: 1. Immediate Memory - List Learning and Story Memory, 2. Visuospatial/Constructional - Figure Copy and Line Orientation, 3. Language - Picture naming and Semantic Fluency, 4. Attention - Digit Span and Coding, and 5. Delayed Memory - List Recall, List Recognition, Story Memory, and Figure Recall. The Story Recall Total Score of the RBANS ranges from 0 to 12, with a higher score representing a better outcome.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The MMSE is a brief, 30-point questionnaire, administered by a trained rater, which provides a quantitative measure of cognitive status in adults and is widely used to screen for cognitive impairment and to estimate the severity of cognitive impairment at a given point in time in AD participants. The MMSE ranges from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater impairment.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
The NPI is used to assess changes in the participant's behavior that occurred in a defined period of time (4 weeks). The NPI assesses 12 behavioral domains on the dimensions of frequency and severity. Frequency is rated on a scale where 0 = absent, 1 = occasionally, 2 = often, 3 = frequently, 4 = very frequently. Severity is rated on a scale where 0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe. For each of the domains, 3 scores are obtained: frequency, severity, and total (product of frequency and severity; ranges from 0 to 12, with a lower score desirable). A total NPI score can be calculated by summing the domain total scores. Total Score ranges from 0 to 144 with a lower score desirable.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
Change From Baseline Over Time in Alzheimer's Disease Composite Score (ADCOMS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96
ADCOMS score is a composite score which is a weighted linear combination of the selected individual scale items from ADAS-Cog-14 (see description in Outcome Measure 10) , MMSE (see description in Outcome Measure 45), and CDR-SB (see description in Outcome Measure 1) scales. The ADCOMS score ranges from 0 to 1.97, with a lower score desirable.
Baseline, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
AbbVie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 4, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • M15-566
  • 2016-001634-10 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For details on when studies are available for sharing, please refer to the link below.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to this clinical trial data can be requested by any qualified researchers who engage in rigorous, independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Use Agreement (DUA). For more information on the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings