Predictive Value of PIIINP and Urinary NGAL in Renal Function Recovery (PIIINP-NGAL)

September 5, 2016 updated by: Nantes University Hospital

Prospective Multicenter Study to Assess the Predictive Value of PIIINP and Urinary NGAL in Renal Function Recovery During Acute Tubular Necrosis

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is defined by a severe, and usually reversible, glomerular filtration rate decreasing. Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) remain the major cause of ARF involving distress and destruction of tubular cells. This specific typology of ARF may evolve toward Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) concretizing a major public health issue.

Predict the progression of ARF towards CRF appears essential. The investigators believe that the PIIINP and urinary NGAL biomarkers may constitute robust biomarkers of progression risk towards CRF.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Acute Renal Failure (ARF) is defined by a severe, and usually reversible, glomerular filtration rate decreasing. Beside its frequency, ARF may be associated with severe prognostic. Thus, patient admitted in ICU and suffering of ARF requiring dialysis, had a higher risk of mortality up to 50%.

Tubulointerstitial nephropathies, particularly Acute Tubular Necrosis (ATN) remain the major cause of ARF, representing 45-50% of cases. The ATN is due to suffering and destruction of tubular cells which are very sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion lesions because tubular reabsorption functions require significant and constant energy intake. However, ATN represents a relatively homogeneous group in terms of acute kidney disease typology. Homogeneity and significant frequency compels ATN as an optimal model to study function recovery after ARF.

ARF constitutes a major public health issue. Actually, incidence of Chronic Renal Failure (CRF) after an ARF, due to ATN, is estimated between 19% and 31%. In addition 12.5% of patients with specific ARF presentation immediately reach End-stage Renal Disease (ESRD), and the occurrence of ARF requiring dialysis, triples the risk of chronic renal support.

Therefore, predict the progression of ARF towards CRF appears essential.

At this time, the investigators currently lack of reliable biomarkers to predict such progression. This pejorative kidney development is due to the persistence of intrarenal inflammation, rapid development of interstitial fibrosis and deficiency in tubular restoration. It involves complex mechanisms of inflammatory response, and vascular and tubular remodeling.

Two promising biomarkers of renal fibrosis, ARF occurrence and CRF progression risk appear in recent years: the Procollagen III N-terminal peptide (PIIINP) and the neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL). The investigators believe that the PIIINP and urinary NGAL may constitute robust biomarkers of progression (or not) towards CRF in ARF context. Firstly, PIIINP is a good reflection of fibrosis process inside the kidney. Secondarily, NGAL is a marker of renal tubule remodeling after renal aggression. The combination of these two biomarkers could therefore efficiently reflect the balance tubular fibrosis/restoration and may allow optimal prediction of renal function recovery.

The investigators hypothesize that these two biomarkers may be used to assess the risk of CRF progression during ARF in ATN context.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
287

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients experimenting ARF in ATN context.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • off-age patient.
  • ATN diagnosis based on 1) typical clinical environment (sepsis, nephrotoxicity...) 2) 50% decrease of glomerular filtration flow (according clearance MDRD) or more than 100micromol plasmatic creatinine increase. 3) no renal function improvement after efficient vascular filling (>750cc normal saline or equivalent).
  • Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ARF not related with ATN context.
  • Life expectancy less than 3 months.
  • Protocol refusal

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratio levels between patients experimenting CRF or not.
Time Frame: 12months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight different ratio PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine levels and evolution between patients experimenting CRF or not (defined less than 60 mL/min according MDRD formula).
12months after initial diagnosis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio levels between patients experimenting CRF or not.
Time Frame: 12, 18 and 24 months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight different ratio NGAL/Urinary Creatinine levels and evolution between patients experimenting CRF or not (defined less than 60 mL/min according MDRD formula).
12, 18 and 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Correlation between NGAL/Urinary Creatinine and PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratios among patients with ARF.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
We expect to highlight linear correlation between NGAL/Urinary Creatinine and PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratios among patients with ARF.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Validation of high diagnostic performance of NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio to predict CRF occurrence.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Sensitivity of NGAL/Urinary Creatinine ratio will be assessed at each time frame.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Validation of high diagnostic performance of PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine to predict CRF occurrence.
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.
Sensitivity of PIIINP/Urinary Creatinine ratio will be assessed at each time frame.
3, 6, 12, 18 or 24 months after initial diagnosis.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nantes University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 5, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PROG/11/59

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Renal Failure

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings