Verification of XAPPORT: a Decision Support App for Physicians Used for Patients Anticoagulated With Rivaroxaban in Terms of Anticoagulation Management in Elective Surgery: Verification Process of Medical Decision Algorithm (VeriXAPPORT)

November 11, 2024 updated by: Bayer

VeriXAPPORT: Verification of XAPPORT: a Decision Support App for Physicians Used for Patients Anticoagulated With Rivaroxaban in Terms of Anticoagulation Management in Elective Surgery: Verification Process of Medical Decision Algorithm

This study shall determine whether XAPPORT - a mobile device app based on different guidelines, the summary of product characteristics of rivaroxaban, and clinical facts and practice - provides adequate guidance to physicians attending patients undergoing elective surgery, who have to interrupt treatment with rivaroxaban for surgery, in deciding how to approach the pre- and postoperative management of anticoagulation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Study design: "retrospective/prospective" Observational study

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

At least 100 evaluable female or male inpatients shall be enrolled after having been discharged from hospital and provide data for analyses. Patients meeting all inclusion criteria and no exclusion criterion are suitable for this study. Enrolment will continue until at least 100 patients with complete data for analysis are available (i.e. 100 evaluable patients). An adequate representation of every bleeding and thromboembolism risk category per indication in the matrix will be taken into account.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female or male patient ≥18 years who provided signed and dated informed consent to the use of their medical data
  • Patient was treated with rivaroxaban before and after surgery because of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) or venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE)
  • Elective surgery in a department of General Surgery or Orthopedics / Trauma Surgery was performed within the last 12 months before study start
  • The patient has been discharged from hospital
  • Patient's medical records are available for data entry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient participated in an interventional drug study within 3 months prior to the surgery and discharge from hospital

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NVAF Patients
Adult female and male patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) treated with rivaroxaban before and after surgery
Other: XAPPORT
A mobile device app based on different guidelines provides adequate guidance to physicians attending patients undergoing elective surgery, who have to interrupt treatment with rivaroxaban for surgery, in deciding how to approach the pre- and postoperative management of anticoagulation.
Other: Expert Panel ("gold standard")
A national panel of experts comprising anesthetists and surgeons from various disciplines advised in developing an algorithm supporting physicians how to approach the perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients receiving rivaroxaban and requiring elective surgery.
VTE/PE Patients
Adult female and male patients with venous thromboembolism/pulmonary embolism (VTE/PE) treated with rivaroxaban before and after surgery
Other: XAPPORT
A mobile device app based on different guidelines provides adequate guidance to physicians attending patients undergoing elective surgery, who have to interrupt treatment with rivaroxaban for surgery, in deciding how to approach the pre- and postoperative management of anticoagulation.
Other: Expert Panel ("gold standard")
A national panel of experts comprising anesthetists and surgeons from various disciplines advised in developing an algorithm supporting physicians how to approach the perioperative management of anticoagulation in patients receiving rivaroxaban and requiring elective surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Agreement rate between the recommendations of XAPPORT and the consolidated recommendations of a qualified Expert Panel ("gold standard").
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Reasons for discrepancies between the recommendations of XAPPORT and the consolidated recommendations of the qualified Expert Panel ("gold standard").
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bayer

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Bayer Study Director, Bayer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2017

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 18903

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings