Changes on Pain and Range of Motion by the Use of Kinesio Taping in Subjects With Myofascial Trigger Point
Changes on Pain and Range of Motion by the Use of Kinesio Taping With Its Corrective of Space Variant on Upper Trapezius Muscle in Subjects With Myofascial Trigger Point
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Agree to participate in the study (signed informed consent)
- Presence of latent myofascial trigger point in upper trapezius.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects in which not clearly identified myofascial trigger point in the upper trapezius .
- Subjects who suffer or have suffered pathologies of upper limb deformities or orthopedic injuries that can alter static and biomechanics of shoulder and neck.
- Subjects who suffer or have suffered rheumatic or neurological disease or chronic shoulder pain and/or neck
- Subjects diagnosed with fibromyalgia, myelopathy or radiculopathy.
- Subjects suffering from any psychiatric disorder (such as anxiety or depression).
- Subjects who have suffered post-traumatic alteration (whiplash type) or cervical surgery.
- Pregnancy risk of abortion.
- Have used analgesics in the 48 hours before participating in the study
- Subjects presenting any contraindications to the application of Kinesio Taping.
- Know the Kinesio Taping technique applied in the study.
- Be receiving physical therapy for any shoulder or neck pathology.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Kinesio Taping
Four Kinesio Taping strips will be placed with tension on skin forming an asterisk.
The point of intersection of the four strips will be just above the myofascial trigger point.
The subject will remain three days with the strips on his skin
|
Four Kinesio Taping strips will be placed with tension on skin forming an asterisk.
The point of intersection of the four strips will be just above the myofascial trigger point.
The subject will remain three days with the strips on his skin
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Sham Kinesio Taping
Four Kinesio Taping strips will be placed without tension on skin forming an asterisk.
The point of intersection of the four strips will be just above the myofascial trigger point.
The subject will remain three days with the strips on his skin
|
Four Kinesio Taping strips will be placed without tension on skin forming an asterisk.
The point of intersection of the four strips will be just above the myofascial trigger point.
The subject will remain three days with the strips on his skin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in pressure pain threshold
Time Frame: At the beginning, immediately after intervention and at 72 hours
|
Is defined as the minimum force applied which induces pain on myofascial trigger point.
Pressure will be applied with algometer
|
At the beginning, immediately after intervention and at 72 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in cervical range of motion
Time Frame: At the beginning, immediately after intervention and at 72 hours
|
Cervical range of motion is measuring movement around this segment of the spine.
Lateral flexion and rotation.
Will be measured with a cervical goniometer
|
At the beginning, immediately after intervention and at 72 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: F Javier Montañez-Aguilera, PhD, CEU Cardenal Herrera University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Silva Parreira Pdo C, Menezes Costa Lda C, Takahashi R, Hespanhol Junior LC, Motta Silva T, da Luz Junior MA, Pena Costa LO. Do convolutions in Kinesio Taping matter? Comparison of two Kinesio Taping approaches in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: protocol of a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2013 Mar;59(1):52; discussion 52. doi: 10.1016/S1836-9553(13)70147-4.
- Ekiz T, Aslan MD, Ozgirgin N. Effects of Kinesio Tape application to quadriceps muscles on isokinetic muscle strength, gait, and functional parameters in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):323-31. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.10.0243.
- Gusella A, Bettuolo M, Contiero F, Volpe G. Kinesiologic taping and muscular activity: a myofascial hypothesis and a randomised, blinded trial on healthy individuals. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2014 Jul;18(3):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
- Wu WT, Hong CZ, Chou LW. The Kinesio Taping Method for Myofascial Pain Control. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:950519. doi: 10.1155/2015/950519. Epub 2015 Jun 21.
- Gerwin RD, Shannon S, Hong CZ, Hubbard D, Gevirtz R. Interrater reliability in myofascial trigger point examination. Pain. 1997 Jan;69(1-2):65-73. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03248-4.
- Akamatsu FE, Ayres BR, Saleh SO, Hojaij F, Andrade M, Hsing WT, Jacomo AL. Trigger points: an anatomical substratum. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:623287. doi: 10.1155/2015/623287. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
- Vanderweeen L, Oostendorp RA, Vaes P, Duquet W. Pressure algometry in manual therapy. Man Ther. 1996 Dec;1(5):258-265. doi: 10.1054/math.1996.0276.
- Walton DM, Levesque L, Payne M, Schick J. Clinical pressure pain threshold testing in neck pain: comparing protocols, responsiveness, and association with psychological variables. Phys Ther. 2014 Jun;94(6):827-37. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20130369. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CEU Cardenal H
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.