Conservative Versus Operative ManageMent of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (COMMA)

July 10, 2020 updated by: Arnold Hill, Beaumont Hospital
This study aims to compare antibiotic treatment versus surgery for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will include patients aged 16 and over, with a first admission with right iliac fossa pain and a raised white cell count or C-reactive protein. Patients will be randomised electronically in a 1:1 ratio either to undergo emergency appendectomy or to receive intravenous antibiotics as an inpatient, until clinical and biochemical improvement is observed, followed by outpatient oral antibiotics. Those who have surgery will have 3 post-operative doses of intravenous antibiotics, unless perforation was identified at the time of surgery, in which case, microbiology will be contacted to advise regarding antibiotic choice and duration. Follow-up by telephone interview will be at 1 week, 1, 3 and 12-month intervals.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
186

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Ireland
      • Dublin, Ireland, D9
        • Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right iliac fossa pain
  • 1st episode in the past 1 year
  • Raised WCC or CRP
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease or appendectomy
  • B-HCG positive
  • Significant co-morbidities
  • Complicated appendicitis as proven by ultrasound, CT or MRI
  • Anaphylaxis to penicillin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Operative Intervention
Laparoscopic +/- open appendicectomy, with antibiotics at induction and 3 further doses of intravenous antibiotics. Co-amoxiclav, or cefuroxime and metronidazole if previous rash-allergy to penicillin.
Procedure: Laparoscopic +/- Open Appendicectomy
Laparoscopic +/- open appendicectomy , with antibiotics at induction (intravenous co-amoxiclav 1.2g, or if penicillin allergic, cefuroxime 1.5g + metronidazole 500mg ), followed by 3 further intravenous doses of the same antibiotic. If a perforation is identified at the time of surgery, microbiology will be contacted regarding choice and duration of of antibiotic.
Experimental: Antibiotic Treatment
Intravenous antibiotics until clinical improvement and then 5 further days of oral antibiotics. Co-amoxiclav, or if rash-allergy to penicillin, cefuroxime and metronidazole.
Drug: Antibiotic treatment

Intravenous co-amoxiclav 1.2g three times daily, then 625mg, orally three times daily. If penicillin allergic, intravenous cefuroxime 1.5g three times daily + metronidazole 500mg three times daily, then oral cefuroxime 500mg twice daily + oral metronidazole 400mg three times daily.

The patient will receive inpatient intravenous antibiotics until sufficient clinical improvement is noted by the surgical team, who will be assessing the patient twice daily. After discharge the patient will receive 5 further days of oral antibiotics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful treatment of appendicitis
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Successful treatment is defined as the resolution of appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital and no recurrent appendicitis during the one-year follow-up. The number of patients requiring surgery for appendicitis in the non-operative group will be measured.
1 year post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of appendicitis
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Confirmed appendicitis occurring after discharge and within one year of enrolment. The number of patients with appendicitis confirmed on either imaging or pathology will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Clostridium difficile infection
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Confirmed symptomatic clostridium difficile infection occurring within one year of enrolment. Any patient who presents with diarrhea during the follow-up period or reports diarrhea during assessment with the follow-up questionnaire will be asked to provide a stool sample which will be tested for clostridium difficile toxins.
1 year post enrollment
Need for re-admission or repeat imaging
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Recurrence or non-resolution of abdominal pain requiring re-admission or re-imaging after discharge and within one year of enrolment. The number of patients who need to be re-admitted to hospital for abdominal pain or require ultrasound, MRI or CT for investigation of abdominal pain during the one year follow-up will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Quality of life Questionnaire taken over the year after recruitment
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Quality of life will be measured in both treatment groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year post enrolment. Quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D-3L validated quality of life questionnaire.
1 year post enrollment
Complication of treatment
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Complications of treatment including surgical site infection, abscess formation and ongoing pain will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Cost evaluation
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Associated cost will be evaluated in the antibiotics only, surgery and recurrence groups
1 year post enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beaumont Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Arnold K Hill, Beaumont Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 10, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 16/59

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings