Conservative Versus Operative ManageMent of Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis (COMMA)

July 10, 2020 updated by: Arnold Hill, Beaumont Hospital
This study aims to compare antibiotic treatment versus surgery for patients with uncomplicated appendicitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will include patients aged 16 and over, with a first admission with right iliac fossa pain and a raised white cell count or C-reactive protein. Patients will be randomised electronically in a 1:1 ratio either to undergo emergency appendectomy or to receive intravenous antibiotics as an inpatient, until clinical and biochemical improvement is observed, followed by outpatient oral antibiotics. Those who have surgery will have 3 post-operative doses of intravenous antibiotics, unless perforation was identified at the time of surgery, in which case, microbiology will be contacted to advise regarding antibiotic choice and duration. Follow-up by telephone interview will be at 1 week, 1, 3 and 12-month intervals.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dublin, Ireland, D9
        • Beaumont Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Right iliac fossa pain
  • 1st episode in the past 1 year
  • Raised WCC or CRP
  • Fluent in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of inflammatory bowel disease or appendectomy
  • B-HCG positive
  • Significant co-morbidities
  • Complicated appendicitis as proven by ultrasound, CT or MRI
  • Anaphylaxis to penicillin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Operative Intervention
Laparoscopic +/- open appendicectomy, with antibiotics at induction and 3 further doses of intravenous antibiotics. Co-amoxiclav, or cefuroxime and metronidazole if previous rash-allergy to penicillin.
Laparoscopic +/- open appendicectomy , with antibiotics at induction (intravenous co-amoxiclav 1.2g, or if penicillin allergic, cefuroxime 1.5g + metronidazole 500mg ), followed by 3 further intravenous doses of the same antibiotic. If a perforation is identified at the time of surgery, microbiology will be contacted regarding choice and duration of of antibiotic.
Experimental: Antibiotic Treatment
Intravenous antibiotics until clinical improvement and then 5 further days of oral antibiotics. Co-amoxiclav, or if rash-allergy to penicillin, cefuroxime and metronidazole.

Intravenous co-amoxiclav 1.2g three times daily, then 625mg, orally three times daily. If penicillin allergic, intravenous cefuroxime 1.5g three times daily + metronidazole 500mg three times daily, then oral cefuroxime 500mg twice daily + oral metronidazole 400mg three times daily.

The patient will receive inpatient intravenous antibiotics until sufficient clinical improvement is noted by the surgical team, who will be assessing the patient twice daily. After discharge the patient will receive 5 further days of oral antibiotics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful treatment of appendicitis
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Successful treatment is defined as the resolution of appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital and no recurrent appendicitis during the one-year follow-up. The number of patients requiring surgery for appendicitis in the non-operative group will be measured.
1 year post enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of appendicitis
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Confirmed appendicitis occurring after discharge and within one year of enrolment. The number of patients with appendicitis confirmed on either imaging or pathology will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Clostridium difficile infection
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Confirmed symptomatic clostridium difficile infection occurring within one year of enrolment. Any patient who presents with diarrhea during the follow-up period or reports diarrhea during assessment with the follow-up questionnaire will be asked to provide a stool sample which will be tested for clostridium difficile toxins.
1 year post enrollment
Need for re-admission or repeat imaging
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Recurrence or non-resolution of abdominal pain requiring re-admission or re-imaging after discharge and within one year of enrolment. The number of patients who need to be re-admitted to hospital for abdominal pain or require ultrasound, MRI or CT for investigation of abdominal pain during the one year follow-up will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Quality of life Questionnaire taken over the year after recruitment
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Quality of life will be measured in both treatment groups at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 1 year post enrolment. Quality of life will be measured using the EQ-5D-3L validated quality of life questionnaire.
1 year post enrollment
Complication of treatment
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Complications of treatment including surgical site infection, abscess formation and ongoing pain will be measured.
1 year post enrollment
Cost evaluation
Time Frame: 1 year post enrollment
Associated cost will be evaluated in the antibiotics only, surgery and recurrence groups
1 year post enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arnold K Hill, Beaumont Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 12, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 8, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe