Study on Aspirin Versus Placebo in Resected Colon Cancer With PI3K Mutation Stage III or II High Risk (ASPIK French)

June 12, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

French Prospective Randomised Double Blind Study, on Aspirin Versus Placebo in Resected Colon Cancer With PI3K Mutation

Four retrospective studies were recently published on efficacy of aspirin in patients with surgically resected colon cancer. Two of these studies strongly suggested that aspirin used in low doses (100 mg/d) after surgical resection of colorectal cancer with PI3K mutation could act as a targeted therapy with a major protective effect on the risk of recurrence. The other two studies did not confirm the benefit of aspirin in this situation. These four retrospective studies provide an insufficient level of evidence to demonstrate the benefit of low-dose aspirin as adjuvant to surgery for colorectal cancer. Therefore, it is necessary as recommended in the conclusion of these studies and meta-analyses to perform a randomised prospective study to validate these data.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
264

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Rouen, France
        • Rouen University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Colonic adenocarcinoma stage III

  • Colonic adenocarcinoma stage II high risk MSS:

    • T4bN0 or T4aN0 tumour penetrating the surface of the visceral peritoneum
    • or less than 12 nodes evaluated;
    • or with at least two of the following criteria:lymphatic involvement, perineural invasion, venous invasion
    • or diagnosis of bowel obstruction or perforation; or poor differentiated tumour.
  • PI3K mutation, exon 9 or 20 (tumour)
  • Resection R0
  • WHO performance status 0-2
  • Chest and abdominal CT scan ≤ 8 weeks
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 years
  • Written consent signed

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticoagulant and/or Antiaggregating treatment including clopidogrel
  • Regular aspirin use (> 3 doses per week during more than 3 months the last year)
  • Contraindication to Aspirin : Allergy to aspirin, Active or antecedent peptic ulcer
  • Severe renal or hepatic insufficiency
  • Pregnancy or nursing ongoing
  • Rectal cancer
  • Hereditary forms (i.e. lynch syndrome patients)
  • Follow-up of the patient not feasible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Patient with aspirin intake
Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will be done in accordance with local guidelines. Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K will be done using operative piece. If the mutation is detected, patient with colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will take aspirin 100 mg/day during 3 years. Blood intake will be done every 6 months to evaluate patient compliance to treatment
Drug: aspirin intake
Patient with colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will take aspirin 100 mg/day during 3 years
Procedure: Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk
Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will be done in accordance with local guidelines
Biological: Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K
Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K will be done using operative piece
Biological: blood intake
Blood intake will be done every 6 months to evaluate patient compliance to treatment
Placebo Comparator: Patient with placebo intake
Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will be done in accordance with local guidelines. Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K will be done using operative piece. If the mutation is detected, patient with colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will take placebo of aspirin 100 mg/day during 3 years. Blood intake will be done every 6 months to evaluate patient compliance to treatment
Procedure: Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk
Surgical resection of colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will be done in accordance with local guidelines
Biological: Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K
Molecular analysis of exon 9 and 20 of PI3K will be done using operative piece
Biological: blood intake
Blood intake will be done every 6 months to evaluate patient compliance to treatment
Drug: placebo intake
Patient with colonic adenocarcinoma stage III or II high risk will take placebo of aspirin 100 mg/day during 3 years

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of patient with local or distant recurrence or second colorectal cancer or death from any cause, whichever occurred first
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patient with local or distant recurrence or second colorectal cancer or death from any cause, whichever occurred first
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of alive patient
Time Frame: 5 years
5 years
Number of pills taken by the patient for compliance evaluation
Time Frame: every 6 months during 3 years
Number of pills taken by the patient will be assess in order to evaluate patient's compliance
every 6 months during 3 years
Number of severe bleeding grade 3-4 events
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
Time Frame: 3 years
Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events as assessed by CTCAE v4.0
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Rouen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Pierre MICHEL, Pr, University Hospital, Rouen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 12, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 12, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015/222/HP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings