Bioequivalence Study of Torrent's Olmesartan Medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochloride Tablets Under Fasting Conditions.

November 9, 2016 updated by: Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited

An Open Label, Randomized, 2-Period, 2-Treatment,2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-Dose BE of FDC of Olmesaartan Medoxomil, Amlopdipine and Hydrochlorothiazide (40+10+25) mg Tab [Torrent,India] Vs Tribenzor(40+10+25) mg Tab [ Daichi Sankyo, Inc USA] in Healthy Subjects-Fasted Condition.

Subjects to compare the single dose bioavailability of Torrent's Olmesartan medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets 40+10+25 mg and Tribenzor® 40+10+25 mg Tablets of Daichi Sankyo Inc, USA. Dosing periods of studies were separated by a washout period of 22 days.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

An Open Label, Randomized, 2-period, 2- Treatment, 2-Sequence, Crossover, Single-dose Bioequivalence Study of FDC of Olmesartan medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets 40+10+25 mg containing Olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg, Amlodipine 10 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg ( Test Formulation, Torrent Pharmaceutical Ltd., India) Versus Tribenzor® 40+10+25 mg Tablets containing Olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg, Amlodipine 10 mg and Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (Reference , Daichi Sankyo Inc, USA.) in Healthy Human Volunteers Under Fasting Condition.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
34

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sex: male
  • Age: 18-45 years
  • Volunteer with BMI of 18-25 (inclusive both) kg/m2
  • Healthy and willing to participate in the study.
  • Volunteer willing to adhere to the protocol requirements and to provide written informed consent.
  • Preferably Non-smokers

Exclusion Criteria:

The volunteers were excluded from the study based on the following criteria:

  • Clinically relevant abnormalities in the results of the laboratory screening evaluation.
  • Clinically significant abnormal ECG or Chest X-ray.
  • Systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg or more than 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure less than 70 mm Hg or more than 90 mm Hg.
  • Pulse rate less than 60/minute or more than 100/minute. Oral temperature less than 95°F or more than 99°F.
  • Respiratory rate less than 14/minute or more than 18/minute
  • History of allergy to the test drug or any drug chemically similar to the drug under investigation.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Positive breath alcohol test
  • Recent history of kidney or liver dysfunction.
  • History of consumption of prescribed medication since last 14 days or OTC medication since last 07 days before beginning of the study.
  • Volunteers suffering from any chronic illness such as arthritis, asthma etc.
  • History of heart failure.
  • HIV, HCV, HBsAg positive volunteers.
  • Opiate, tetra hydrocannabinol, amphetamine, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, Cocaine positive volunteers based on urine test.
  • Volunteers suffering from any psychiatric (acute or chronic) illness requiring medications.
  • Administration of any study drug in the period 0 to 3 months before entry to the study.
  • History of significant blood loss due to any reason, including blood donation in the past 3 months.
  • History of pre-existing bleeding disorder.
  • Existence of any surgical or medical condition, which, in the judgment of the chief investigator and/or clinical investigator/physician, might interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of the drug or likely to compromise the safety of volunteers.
  • Inability to communicate or co-operate due to language problem, poor mental development or impaired cerebral function.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Test
Torrent's Olmesartan medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide (40+10+25) mg Tablets
Drug: Torrent's Olmesartan medoxomil, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide Tablets
Oral, crossover
Active Comparator: Reference
Tribenzor (40+10+25) mg Tablets of Daichi Sankyo Inc, USA
Drug: Tribenzor Tablets of Daichi Sankyo Inc, USA
Oral, crossover

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cmax
Time Frame: Pre-dose to 72 hours after post dose
Pre-dose to 72 hours after post dose
AUC
Time Frame: Pre-dose to 72 hours after post dose
Pre-dose to 72 hours after post dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 11, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 9, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PK-10-155

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings