Role of CD133 & Microsatellite Status in Evaluation of Rectosigmoid Cancer Young Adults Received Neoadjuvant Treatment

May 5, 2018 updated by: Ereny Samwel, Assiut University

Role of CD133 and Microsatellite Status in Evaluation of Young Adults With Rectosigmoid Cancer Received Neoadjuvant Treatment

Microsatellite instability is more common in colorectal cancer ( CRC) young patient which is associated with good prognosis and is considered as a predictor for good response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Counting of ( cluster of differentiation) CD 133 +ve cells ,as a marker for enrichment with colorectal cancer stem cells ,is considered as a prognostic marker for poor survival and predictor for radio-resistance. Correlation between microsatellite status ( MS) and CD133 count has not yet studied especially in young patients with rectosigmoid cancer. So the investigators hypothesize that there is correlation between microsatellite status, CD133+ve cells count , occurrence of CRC in young patients and resistance to standard treatment regimen. Improvement of response to treatment and choice of the best regime to avoid non beneficial treatment modality are the goal of this study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The age incidence of colorectal cancer is above fifty years old world wide .But, when comparing the incidence and clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer in western countries and countries with constrained resources as Egypt , there is significant lower median age of incidence. In Egypt reports showed that CRC was detected in 11-15% of patients who underwent colonoscopy and diagnosed in 29-31% of patients aged 40 years or younger . Similar data come from other highly populated resource-constrained countries in Asia . This early onset rectal cancer is mainly poorly differentiated, advanced at prognosis, sporadic with no familial predisposition.Young patients with microsatellite high (MSI-h ) proximal cancer colon are with good prognosis but there is lacking data about the prognostic and predictive role of these genes in young patients with irradiated rectal cancer. As those young aged patients show worse outcome in term of progression free survival and higher rates of metastatic events , we hypothesize that colorectal cancer stem cells (CR-CSC) may have a role in this dismal outcome.CD133 is one of the best-characterized markers of CR-CSCs, many studies have demonstrated that CD133 expression was correlated with survival, recurrence, metastasis and chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer.

So the study is trying to establish a correlation between the MS status and enrichment with CR-CSC and if this proposed relationship may have implication of disease outcome and treatment results.

Patients and methods:

The investigators will enroll about 30 patients and will examine the pre- treatment colonoscopic biopsy for

  • Type and grade of carcinoma under light microscopy after staining with haematoxylin and eosin.

  • Immunocytochemistry performed on 4 µ-thick sections from paraffin blocks using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase technique. The sections will be routinely deparaffinized, rehydrated through graded alcohols to distilled water. Deparaffinized sections will be treated with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. Suitable antigen retrieval will be carried out. Blocking serum will be applied for 10 min. The sections will be incubated with antibody raised against

    1. MMR proteins : MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6,PMS-2 .
    2. CD133. Then the investigators will collect the blocks from the same patients after receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and underwent surgery and examine
    1. Under light microscope after staining for :Type and grade of carcinoma Angiovascular invasion Degree of immune response Pattern and depth of invasion Lymph node status.
    2. CD 133 positive cell count with the same previously reported technique . The resulting immune complex will be detected by a universal staining kit following the instructions attached with the kit. Slides will be washed several times in phosphate buffer saline and will be placed in it for 5 minutes between each step except after peroxidase reagent the washing will be by distilled water. Negative and positive controls will be included in each staining series. Immunohistochemical evaluation will be done according to Ren F et al and Zhang X et al . Digital images will be obtained with a digital camera system

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
      • Assiut, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Ereny Samwel Poles
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ola N Abdl fatah, Ass.prof

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged less than fourty years old with rectosigmoid cancer diagnosed with colonscopic biobsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy then went for surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient less than forty years old with rectosigmoid cancer.
  • Sporadic colorectal cancer patients; no family history of first degree relatives .
  • Diagnosed with colonoscopic biopsy.
  • Patient received neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
  • Radical surgery was done after neoadjuvant treatment .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient less than 18 and more than forty.
  • Patient who underwent radical surgery from the start for early disease.
  • Patient with metastatic colorectal cancer.
  • patients with positive family history.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Differential expression of CD133 based on microsatellite status and correlation with clinicopathological features.
Time Frame: 3 month
3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the microsatellite status of young adult with rectosigmoid cancer
Time Frame: 3 months
Define the microsatellite status of this group of patient as it is underrepresented in the most of studies
3 months
The effect of radiotherapy on the count of CD 133 +ve cells
Time Frame: 3 months
Examine if radiotherapy increases the stemness of the tumour
3 months
Define microsatellite status and enrichment with CD + ve 133 as colorectal cancer stem cells as a prognostic marker for this group of patients
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
If radiotherapy increases the count of CD +ve 133 cells , does that increase significantly affects the progression free survival
Time Frame: 6 month
6 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Ola N Abdl fattah, Ass.Prof, Assiut University
  • Study Director: Dalia A El sers, Ass.prof, Assiut University
  • Study Director: Mahmoud R Shehata, Lecturer, Assiut University
  • Study Chair: Samia A Ali, Prof, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 5, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016/06/17-002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Young Adult

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings