Correlates of GERD Symptom Severity

December 22, 2020 updated by: Michelle Dossett, MD, PhD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Physiologic and Behavioral Correlates of GERD Symptom Severity

This is a pilot study measuring physiologic and behavioral correlates of symptom severity in adult patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Subjects will complete questionnaires regarding their GERD-related symptoms and have a visit with a study clinician regarding their symptoms. We will measure heart rate variability and galvanic skin response in patients during the visits and video record the visits. Subjects will complete a daily GERD symptom diary for 2 weeks and then return to the study center to complete additional questionnaires and an exit interview.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with active GERD-related symptoms.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ages 21-70 years old
  • Heartburn symptoms 3 or more days per week with an average daily symptom severity of 3 or more on a 7 day baseline symptom diary
  • English language proficiency
  • Willingness to be videotaped and connected to physiologic monitoring devices during the visit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Crohn's disease, systemic sclerosis, known active ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or untreated/active Barrett's esophagitis based on subject self-report and/or medical record review
  • Heavy alcohol use (> 6 drinks/week for women and > 13 drinks/week for men)
  • Pregnant women.
  • Dementia or significant memory difficulties
  • Severe, unstable psychiatric disease
  • Greater than 15 doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) within the prior 30 days (aspirin ≤ 325 mg daily permitted) or ongoing NSAID use at a level deemed likely to interfere with the study
  • Failure to complete the baseline symptom diary for at least 6 of 7 days
  • Change in GERD treatment regimen within the last 2 weeks (subjects may use antacids, H2 receptor blockers, and/or proton pump inhibitors as long as they are symptomatic on a stable regimen)
  • Allergy to adhesives
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
GERD Patients
Subjects with active GERD symptoms.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Association of Change in Patient's GSR From Beginning to End of Study Visit With GERD Symptom Severity 2 Weeks Later
Time Frame: Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for change in GSR)
Galvanic skin response (GSR) was measured with a device from ADInstruments during the baseline study visit. Values ranged from 0.93 - 12 micro-Siemens (μS). Change in GSR was calculated as mean value of GSR for the first 2 minutes of the study visit minus mean value of GSR for the last 2 minutes of the study visit.
Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for change in GSR)
Association of Change in Patient's High Frequency HRV From Beginning to End of Study Visit With GERD Symptom Severity 2 Weeks Later
Time Frame: Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for change in HRV/RMSSD)
Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured using a device from ADInstruments gathering data at 256 Hz. We used the RMSSD (Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences) value as a proxy for high frequency HRV. Measured values ranged from 0 - 150 msec. Change in high frequency HRV was calculated as the RMSSD value for the first 5 minutes of the study visit minus the RMSSD value for the last 5 minutes of the study visit.
Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for change in HRV/RMSSD)
Correlation Between Concordance in GSR Between Patient and Physician During the Study Visit and Percent Change in Patients' GERD Symptoms Over 2 Weeks
Time Frame: Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for concordance between patient and physician GSR)
Concordance in galvanic skin response (GSR) between patient and physician was calculated using an established approach (Marci CD, 2007; PMID 17299296) to create a single index value for the visit. The natural logarithm of this value was taken to reduce skew. A value greater than 0 means more than 50% concordance in the data, a value less than zero means less than 50% concordance in the data.
Beginning to end of study visit (1 hour or less for concordance between patient and physician GSR)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post GERD Symptom Severity
Time Frame: 2 weeks (baseline and 2 week follow-up)
GERD symptom severity at follow-up was assessed by self-report on a 7-day symptom diary (symptoms collected days 8-14 after the study visit). Possible daily scores ranged from 0-12 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (sum of daytime heartburn, nighttime heartburn, and acid regurgitation symptoms each rated 0-4 in severity [none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe]). Daily scores across the 7 days were averaged to create the Post GERD symptom severity score. Adapted from: Miner P, et. al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12094846.
2 weeks (baseline and 2 week follow-up)
Percent Change in Patient's GERD Symptoms
Time Frame: 2 weeks (baseline and 2 week follow-up)

Percent change in patient's GERD symptoms was calculated as: (post GERD symptom severity - baseline GERD symptom severity) / baseline GERD symptom severity*100.

GERD symptom severity scores were averaged across 7 day baseline and follow-up periods from a symptom diary (adapted from Miner P, 2002; PMID 12094846). Scores ranged from 0-12 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms (sum of daytime heartburn, nighttime heartburn, and acid regurgitation each rated 0-4 in severity [none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe]).
2 weeks (baseline and 2 week follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michelle Dossett, MD, PHD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 3, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 7, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 20, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 11, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 13, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2016P001628
  • 1K23AT009218 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on GERD

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings