Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of DA-9701 With Domperidone in Patients With Parkinson's Disease

March 19, 2019 updated by: Seoul National University Hospital

Therapeutic Efficacy of DA-9701 on Gastric Motility in Patients With Parkinson's Disease Evaluated by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Randomized Controlled, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial

This study will evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of DA-9701 with domperidone in patients with Parkinson's disease

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To prevent nausea and vomiting induced by anti-parkinsonian drugs, prokinetic drugs are frequently prescribed in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Additionally, there has been some evidence that prokinetics might improve PD symptom fluctuations. From this background, the investigators will evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of DA-9701 in PD patients.

In this study, 40 patients will be enrolled and randomly allocated 1:1 to receive either domperidone or DA-9701. The gastric function of each study participant will be evaluated using the MRI technique before and after 4 weeks of the treatment. The study participants will also be subjected to complete the gastrointestinal symptom diary before and during the treatment period. In addition, plasma levodopa concentrations will be determined 30 minutes after dose administration before and after treatment.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Korea, Republic of
    • Gyeonggi-do
      • Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of, 463-707
        • Cheol Min Shin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • subjects diagnosed with spontaneous parkinsonism by the United Kingdom(UK) Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank criteria
  • subjects who are able to explain symptoms they experience and to complete relevant assessment and exams including questionaires
  • subjects who understand the purpose and protocols of the study and agree to participate on the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects who experience psychiatrical disorders such as cognitive or behavioral disorders
  • subjects who are on prokinetics or who are unable to cease such medication
  • subjects who present neurological disorders which influence gastrointestinal mobility
  • subjects who present gastrointestinal conditions which influence gastrointestinal mobility
  • subjects with a history of gastrectomy or colectomy
  • subjects who are unable to receive and complete the course of medication due to other metabolic disorders
  • subjects diagnosed with parkinson plus syndrome
  • subjects who are unable to undergo MRI scan for safety reasons due to claustrophobia or certain devices such as cardiac pacemakers or aneurysm clips

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: DA-9701
In this arm, the study participants will receive DA-9701 30mg + placebo domperidone tablet tid ac for 4 weeks.
Drug: DA-9701
Following 2-week screening period, study participants in this group will be given a standard dose of DA-9701 (30 mg t.i.d). Concomitant anti-PD medication will be continued without modification during the trial. The investigators will evaluate dyspepsia and constipation symptoms, gastric emptying by MRI, UPDRS and clinical variables at baseline and at the end of the study.
Other Names:
  • Motilitone
Drug: Placebo domperidone
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Domperidone
(This study is a randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Thus it is designed to have no placebo arm.) In this arm, the study participants will receive domperidone 10mg + placebo DA-9701 tablet tid ac +for 4 weeks.
Drug: Domperidone
Following 2-week screening period, study participants in this group will be given a standard dose of domperidone (10 mg t.i.d). Concomitant anti-PD medication will be continued without modification during the trial. The investigators will evaluate dyspepsia and constipation symptoms, gastric emptying by MRI, UPDRS and clinical variables at baseline and at the end of the study.
Other Names:
  • Motilium-M
Drug: Placebo DA-9701

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of gastric motility evaluated using MRI from baseline at 4 weeks after the treatment
Time Frame: 0, 4 weeks
MRI is known to be accurate and useful in evaluating gastric motility. Gastric emptying rate (GER) evaluated using MRI will be compared before and after the treatment, and between the groups.
0, 4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's symptoms of dyspepsia and constipation assessed patient diary
Time Frame: -1 to 4 weeks
The study participants will fill up the gastrointestinal symptom diary before and during the treatment period. In addition, the investigators will assess the Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) for dyspeptic symptoms at the end of the treatment period.
-1 to 4 weeks
Levodopa plasma concentration 30 minutes after the L-dopa administration
Time Frame: 0, 4 weeks
Plasma levodopa concentrations will be determined 30 minutes after L-dopa dose administration before and after treatment.
0, 4 weeks
UPDRS Part III score
Time Frame: 0, 4 weeks
To evaluate any deteriorations in Parkinson's disease, the investigators will assess Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score before and after treatment in the 2 groups.
0, 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Seoul National University Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Cheol Min Shin, M.D., Ph.D., Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 23, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2017

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • B-1210/173-006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson's Disease,Idiopathic

Clinical Trials on DA-9701

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings