A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics (PK), Pharmacodynamics (PD), and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients With Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

March 11, 2026 updated by: UCB Biopharma SRL

A Multicenter, Randomized, Subject-Blind, Investigator-Blind Study to Evaluate the Time Course of Pharmacodynamic Response, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Bimekizumab in Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

This is a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, subject-blind, investigator-blind, study to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of bimekizumab in adult subjects with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
49

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Kogarah, Australia
        • Ps0016 102
      • Melbourne, Australia
        • Ps0016 101
      • Woolloongabba, Australia
        • Ps0016 104
  • Canada
      • Ajax, Canada
        • Ps0016 201
      • London, Canada
        • Ps0016 203
      • Windsor, Canada
        • Ps0016 202
  • Moldova
      • Chisinau, Moldova
        • Ps0016 501
  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Bexley, Ohio, United States
        • Ps0016 704

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female at least 18 years of age and less than or equal to 70
  • Chronic plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months prior to Screening
  • Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) >=12 and body surface area (BSA) >=10% and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score >=3 on a 5-point scale
  • Candidates for systemic psoriasis therapy and/or phototherapy and/or chemophototherapy
  • Female subjects must be postmenopausal, permanently sterilized or, if of childbearing potential, must be willing to use a highly effective method of contraception up till 20 weeks after last administration of study drug, and have a negative pregnancy test at Visit 1 (Screening) and immediately prior to first dose
  • Male subjects with a partner of childbearing potential must be willing to use a condom when sexually active, up till 20 weeks after the last administration of study medication (anticipated 5 half-lives)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects previously participating in a bimekizumab study
  • Subjects with erythrodermic, guttate, pustular form of psoriasis, or drug-induced psoriasis
  • History of chronic or recurrent infections, or a serious or life-threatening infection within the 6 months prior to the Baseline Visit (including herpes zoster)
  • High risk of infection in the Investigator's opinion
  • Current sign or symptom that may indicate an active infection
  • Concurrent acute or chronic viral hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection
  • Live (includes attenuated) vaccination within the 8 weeks prior to Baseline
  • Subjects with concurrent malignancy or history of malignancy during the past 5 years (except for specific malignant condition as defined in the protocol)
  • Primary immunosuppressive conditions
  • TB infection, high risk of acquiring TB infection, latent TB infection (LTBI), or current or history of NTMB infection
  • Laboratory abnormalities, as defined in the study protocol
  • Any condition which, in the Investigator's judgement, would make the subject unsuitable for inclusion in the study
  • Exposure to more than 1 biological response modifier (limited to anti-TNF or IL-12/-23) or any biologic response modifier during the three months prior to the Baseline Visit
  • Subjects have received previous treatment with any anti-IL-17 therapy for the treatment of psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis
  • Subjects with a diagnosis of inflammatory conditions other than psoriasis or psoriatic arthritis, including but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, sarcoidosis, or systemic lupus erythematosus. Subjects with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis are allowed as long as they have no active symptomatic disease at Screening or Baseline
  • Subjects taking psoriatic arthritis medications other than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or analgesics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment Arm 1
Subjects randomized in this arm will receive a combination of Bimekizumab and Placebo injections.
Drug: Bimekizumab
Based on their randomization subjects will receive a combination of several injections of Bimekizumab.
Other Names:
  • UCB4940
Other: Placebo
Subjects will receive injections of Placebo.
Experimental: Treatment Arm 2
Subjects randomized in this arm will receive Bimekizumab injections.
Drug: Bimekizumab
Based on their randomization subjects will receive a combination of several injections of Bimekizumab.
Other Names:
  • UCB4940

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) at Week 28
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 28
The PASI is the most commonly used and validated assessment for grading the severity of psoriasis in clinical studies. The PASI quantifies the severity and extent of the disease and weighs these with the percentage of body surface area (BSA) involvement. The percent area of involvement (BSA%) is estimated across 4 body areas; head (10%), upper limbs (20%), trunk (30%), and lower limbs (40%) and then transferred into a grade. The Investigator assesses the average redness, thickness, and scaliness of lesions in each body area (each on a 5 point scale); 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, and 4=very marked. The PASI score ranges from 0 to 72 with a higher score indicating increased disease severity.
From Baseline to Week 28
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Baseline
Time Frame: at Baseline
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Baseline
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 2
Time Frame: at Week 2
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 2
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 4
Time Frame: at Week 4
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 4
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 8
Time Frame: at Week 8
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 8
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 12
Time Frame: at Week 12
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 12
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 16
Time Frame: at Week 16
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (µg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 16
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 20
Time Frame: at Week 20
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 20
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 24
Time Frame: at Week 24
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 24
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 28
Time Frame: at Week 28
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 28
Plasma Concentration of Bimekizumab at Week 36
Time Frame: at Week 36
Plasma concentration was expressed as geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) and measured in micrograms per milliliter (μg/mL). Note: Means, Lower confidence interval (LCI), Upper confidence interval (UCI) are only calculated if at least 2/3 of the concentrations were quantified at the respective time point. Values below limit of quantification (BLQ) are replaced by value of lower limit of quantification (LLOQ)/2 (=0.075ug/mL) in calculations of means.
at Week 36
Percentage of Participants Reporting Positive Anti-Drug-Antibodies (ADA) Titre Prior to Study Treatment With Bimekizumab at Baseline
Time Frame: at Baseline
An ADA status of positive was concluded for any participant with an ADA level that was above cut point (ACP) and 'confirmed positive' (CP) at any time point. A participant was classified as having treatment-induced ADA positivity when meeting one of the following criteria: -The Baseline result was either below cut point (BCP) or ACP and 'not confirmed positive' (NCP), and at least 1 post Baseline time point was ACP and CP. -The Baseline result was positive (ACP and CP) and at least one post-Baseline measurement showed a pre-defined fold increase in titre from the Baseline value. Note: The overall status of a participant is 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was ACP and confirmed positive.
at Baseline
Percentage of Participants Reporting an Overall Positive Anti-Drug-Antibodies (ADA) Titre Following Study Treatment With Bimekizumab
Time Frame: From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (Week 36)
An ADA status of positive was concluded for any participant with an ADA level that was above cut point (ACP) and 'confirmed positive' (CP) at any time point. A participant was classified as having treatment-induced ADA positivity when meeting one of the following criteria: -The Baseline result was either below cut point (BCP) or ACP and 'not confirmed positive' (NCP), and at least 1 post Baseline time point was ACP and CP. -The Baseline result was positive (ACP and CP) and at least one post-Baseline measurement showed a pre-defined fold increase in titre from the Baseline value. Note: The overall status of a participant is 'Positive' if at any post-Baseline visit the result was ACP and confirmed positive.
From Baseline to Safety Follow-Up Visit (Week 36)
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: From Screening to Safety Follow-Up Visit (Week 36)
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Within the Safety Set, this trial reported a total of 164 occurences of adverse events, of which 7 were pre-treatment adverse events and 157 were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
From Screening to Safety Follow-Up Visit (Week 36)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 75% or Higher Improvement From Baseline in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 16
The PASI75 response assessments are based on at least 75% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
From Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% or Higher Improvement From Baseline in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 16
The PASI90 response assessments are based on at least 90% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
From Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Improvement From Baseline in PASI (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index) Score at Week 16
Time Frame: From Baseline to Week 16
The PASI100 response assessments are based on at least 100% improvement in the PASI score from Baseline. This is a scoring system that averages the redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic lesions (on a 0-4 scale), and weights the resulting score by the area of skin involved. Body divided into 4 areas: head, arms, trunk to groin, and legs to top of buttocks. Assignment of an average score for the redness, thickness, and scaling for each of the 4 body areas with a score of 0 (clear) to 4 (very marked). Determining the percentage of skin covered with PSO for each of the body areas and converting to a 0 to 6 scale. Final PASI= average redness, thickness, and scaliness of the psoriatic skin lesions, multiplied by the involved psoriasis area score of the respective section, and weighted by the percentage of the person's affected skin for the respective section. The minimum possible PASI score is 0= no disease, the maximum score is 72= maximal disease.
From Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants With IGA (Investigator´s Global Assessment) Response at Week 16
Time Frame: at Week 16
The Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) measures the overall psoriasis severity following a 5-point scale (0-4), where scale 0= clear, no signs of psoriasis; presence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, scale 1= almost clear, no thickening; normal to pink coloration; no to minimal focal scaling, scale 2= mild thickening, pink to light red coloration and predominately fine scaling, 3= moderate, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; dull to bright red, clearly distinguishable to moderate thickening; moderate scaling and 4= severe thickening with hard edges; bright to deep dark red coloration; severe/coarse scaling covering almost all or all lesions.
at Week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UCB Biopharma SRL

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Parexel

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: UCB Cares, 001 844 599 2273(UCB)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 27, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 11, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 11, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 18, 2017

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PS0016
  • 2016-002368-15 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Clinical Trials on Bimekizumab

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings