MED in UVB Devices in the Presence and Absence of UV Filter

August 26, 2019 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Comparing Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) in UVB Devices in the Presence and Absence of UV Filter

Psoriasis affects 2-3% of the American population. While a wide variety of therapies currently exist, including topical corticosteroids and Vit D analogs, oral immunosuppressant and retinoid agents a better understanding of phototherapy is needed. Given the prevalence of localized psoriasis and dissatisfaction with treatment, investigation of localized treatment should be a priority for researchers with goals to improve the current standard of care.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Psoriasis affects 2-3% of the American population. Psoriasis involving less than 10% BSA in the absence of joint involvement tends to be treated locally. More than 80% of people with psoriasis have <10% BSA involvement. A wide variety of therapies currently exist, including topical corticosteroids and Vit D analogs, oral immunosuppressant, retinoid agents, and phototherapy. Given the prevalence of localized psoriasis and dissatisfaction with treatment, investigation of localized treatment should be a priority for researchers with goals to improve the current standard of care.

UV light has a wavelength of 10nm - 380nm, which is slightly shorter than the wavelength of visible light. The UV light can be further classified to a narrow spectrum (UVB light has a wavelength of 280-315 nm). UVA has a wavelength of 315-400nm. Tanning beds use UV light to produce their effects. Whole body ultraviolet B (UVB) phototherapy is efficacious and is recommended as a first line option in selective psoriasis treatment recommendations. In pregnancy, UVB therapy is recommended as first line treatment for extensive plaque and guttate psoriasis.

Although UVB phototherapy has been included in the guidelines for psoriasis treatment, its use does not come without risk. Toxicities include cataract formation, herpes reactivation, photoaging, and with long-term exposure may lead to an increased risk of genital tumors in males. In addition, the use of UVB is rarely used as a first-line treatment for localized psoriasis probably due to financial issues and increased requirements for clinic visits. Narrowband UVB therapy (emission 311- 313nm) is superior to broad-band UVB light, and reduces toxicity. Psoriatic plaques can withstand much higher doses of UV light than the surrounding uninvolved skin; UV treatment of just the involved skin therefore offers increased efficacy in fewer treatments. In addition, localized treatment may remain in remission even 4 months after clearing with localized laser treatment. Localized treatment should therefore be a more favorable treatment option for psoriasis, using higher doses with sparing of healthy skin.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27106
        • Elias Oussedik

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female subjects older than 18 years of age.
  • Good health as determined by lack of clinically significant abnormalities in medical history and clinical assessment, as judged by the Investigator.
  • Subject is capable of understanding and willing to provide a signed and dated written voluntary informed consent before any protocol specific procedures are performed.
  • The subject is able to complete the study and comply with study instructions, including attending all study visits.
  • If a female subject of childbearing potential, subject has a negative urine pregnancy test.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has a history of being non-responsive to UVB therapy
  • Subject received phototherapy in the past four weeks
  • Subject used topical therapy within two weeks from baseline (Excluding emollients)
  • Subject has used experimental drugs or devices at least one month prior to Baseline
  • Subject has a known history of Photosensitivity disorder (Including Xeroderma pigmentosum, SLE, Cockayne Syndrome, Bloom Syndrome) or is currently taking any medication that causes photosensitivity that requires they avoid sunlight.
  • Subject has other serious skin disorder or any chronic medical condition that is not well controlled.
  • Subject has major illness within 30 days prior to the Baseline visit.
  • Subject has history of any immunocompromising disease.
  • Subject is pregnant or nursing. Pregnant and nursing females will not be allowed in the study, and females of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test at Baseline.
  • Subject has a skin condition or disease that may require concurrent therapy or may confound the evaluation.
  • Presence of any skin condition or coloration that would interfere with placement of test sites or the response or assessment of MED.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Laser
All six interventions will be applied to patient's back.
Device: Psoriashield in the presence of a non-UV absorbing block.
The psoriashield will be applied to patient's back in the presence of a non-UV absorbing block.
Device: Psoriashield in the presence of a UV absorbing block.
The psoriashield will be applied to patient's back in the presence of a UV absorbing block.
Device: Psoriashield
The psoriashield will be applied to patient's back.
Device: Xtrac laser in the presence of a non-UV absorbing block.
The Xtrac laser will be applied to patient's back in the presence of a UV absorbing block.
Device: Xtrac in the presence of a UV absorbing block.
The Xtrac laser will be applied to patient's back in the presence of a non-UV absorbing block.
Device: Xtrac laser
The Xtrac laser will be applied to patient's back.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MED Reading
Time Frame: 24 hours
Minimal Erythemal Dose
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Steven R Feldman, MD PhD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 17, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 17, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 26, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00042226

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings