Comparison of Successful Spinal Needle Insertion Between Obese and Non-obese Pregnant Women
Comparison of Successful Spinal Needle Insertion Between Obese and Non-obese Pregnant Women in Crossed Leg Sitting Position Undergoing Caesarean Section
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
DKI Jakarta
-
Central Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
- Cipto Mangunkusumo Central National Hospital
-
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia, 10430
- Cipto Mangunkusumo Cental National Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects aged 18-45 years old, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who were planned to undergo caesarian section with spinal anesthesia in crossed leg sitting position.
- Subjects have been explained about the study, have agreed to enroll and have signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects with contraindications for spinal anesthesia
- Subjects with fetal's head trapped, umbilical prolapse, and foot presentation
- Subjects with pre-eclampsia
- Subjects with cardiovascular diseases
- Subjects with scoliosis
- Subjects with recent lumbal surgery history
- Subjects who cannot sit in crossed leg sitting position.
Drop out criteria:
- Subjects with worsening conditions before spinal anesthesia
- Subjects with failed spinal needle insertion and thus received general anesthesia
- Subjects with twin pregnancy
- Subjects drop out the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Obese
Obese pregnant women received spinal anesthesia using Quincke Needle 25G/27G in crossed leg sitting position for caesarean section
|
Spinal anesthesia done in crossed leg sitting position
|
|
Experimental: Non-obese
Non-obese pregnant women received spinal anesthesia using Quincke Needle 25G/27G in crossed leg sitting position for caesarean section
|
Spinal anesthesia done in crossed leg sitting position
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of successful spinal needle placement in the first attempt
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The number of successful spinal needle placement in the first attempt was recorded in yes/no method.
|
2 months
|
|
The number of needle-bone contact
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The number of spinal needle-bone contact
|
2 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The number of blood vessel puncture incidence.
Time Frame: 2 months
|
The number of blood vessel puncture incidence by the spinal needle during insertion.
|
2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Susilo Chandra, Indonesia University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004 Oct;14(9):1171-5. doi: 10.1381/0960892042386869.
- Soltani Mohammadi S, Hassani M, Marashi SM. Comparing the squatting position and traditional sitting position for ease of spinal needle placement: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Apr 5;4(2):e13969. doi: 10.5812/aapm.13969. eCollection 2014 May.
- Reinius H, Jonsson L, Gustafsson S, Sundbom M, Duvernoy O, Pelosi P, Hedenstierna G, Freden F. Prevention of atelectasis in morbidly obese patients during general anesthesia and paralysis: a computerized tomography study. Anesthesiology. 2009 Nov;111(5):979-87. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181b87edb.
- Davies GA, Maxwell C, McLeod L, Gagnon R, Basso M, Bos H, Delisle MF, Farine D, Hudon L, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Roggensack A, Leduc D, Ballerman C, Biringer A, Duperron L, Jones D, Lee LS, Shepherd D, Wilson K; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Obesity in pregnancy. No. 239, February 2010. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Aug;110(2):167-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.03.008.
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.aog.0000425667.10377.60.
- Rodrigues FR, Brandao MJ. Regional anesthesia for cesarean section in obese pregnant women: a retrospective study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;61(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/S0034-7094(11)70002-2.
- Watanabe S, Kobara K, Ishida H, Eguchi A. Influence of trunk muscle co-contraction on spinal curvature during sitting cross-legged. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr-Jun;50(3-4):187-92.
- Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, Wadsworth J, Joffe M, Beard RW, Regan L, Robinson S. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001 Aug;25(8):1175-82. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801670.
- Mhyre JM. Anesthetic management for the morbidly obese pregnant woman. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Winter;45(1):51-70. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31802b8a90. No abstract available.
- Vricella LK, Louis JM, Mercer BM, Bolden N. Anesthesia complications during scheduled cesarean delivery for morbidly obese women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):276.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
- Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R. Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1122-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-4.x.
- Gulay U, Meltem T, Nadir SS, Aysin A. Ultrasound-guided evaluation of the lumbar subarachnoid space in lateral and sitting positions in pregnant patients to receive elective cesarean operation. Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jan-Feb;31(1):76-81. doi: 10.12669/pjms.311.5647.
- Kim SH, Kim DY, Han JI, Baik HJ, Park HS, Lee GY, Kim JH. Vertebral level of Tuffier's line measured by ultrasonography in parturients in the lateral decubitus position. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014 Sep;67(3):181-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2014.67.3.181. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
- Cadi P, Guenoun T, Journois D, Chevallier JM, Diehl JL, Safran D. Pressure-controlled ventilation improves oxygenation during laparoscopic obesity surgery compared with volume-controlled ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):709-16. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen067.
- McKay RE, Malhotra A, Cakmakkaya OS, Hall KT, McKay WR, Apfel CC. Effect of increased body mass index and anaesthetic duration on recovery of protective airway reflexes after sevoflurane vs desflurane. Br J Anaesth. 2010 Feb;104(2):175-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep374. Epub 2009 Dec 26.
- Anuurad E, Shiwaku K, Nogi A, Kitajima K, Enkhmaa B, Shimono K, Yamane Y. The new BMI criteria for asians by the regional office for the western pacific region of WHO are suitable for screening of overweight to prevent metabolic syndrome in elder Japanese workers. J Occup Health. 2003 Nov;45(6):335-43. doi: 10.1539/joh.45.335.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IndonesiaUAnes010
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Caesarian Section
-
NCT01566253Completed
-
NCT02184559UnknownScheduled Caesarian Section
-
NCT02838329UnknownRopivacaine | Labour | Epidural Top-up | Caesarian Section
-
NCT01205204WithdrawnFull Term Pregnant Patients | Undergoing Lower Segment Caesarian Section
-
NCT01524107UnknownUrgent Caesarian Section Secondary to Cord Prolapse
-
NCT06871033CompletedPostoperative Pain | Caesarian Section
-
NCT06324331Not yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
NCT07406373CompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean Section
-
NCT05669300CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence
-
NCT05536869RecruitingCesarean Section; Dehiscence | Extra Peritoneal Caesarean Section
Clinical Trials on Crossed leg sitting position
-
NCT02766829CompletedAdult Patients With Spinal Anesthesia
-
NCT03241069Completed
-
NCT03747796Completed
-
NCT02620241CompletedGastro-oesophageal Reflux
-
NCT06579131Not yet recruitingSitting Position | Posture; Myositis
-
NCT02000570CompletedNeurosurgery in Sitting Position
-
NCT07546851CompletedResistance Exercise | Muscle Contractile Properties | Foot Progression Angle
-
NCT04754282CompletedEpidural Analgesia for Labour and Delivery
-
NCT01401920CompletedInfants or Children Undergoing Open Heart Surgery