Mild Encephalopathy in the Newborn Treated With Darbepoetin (MEND)

December 1, 2023 updated by: University of New Mexico

Mild Encephalopathy in the Newborn Treated With Darbepoetin (MEND)

This is a Phase II multicenter placebo-controlled randomized, feasibility/safety trial. Infants >34 week gestational age with perinatal acidemia and mild neonatal encephalopathy on the modified Sarnat neurologic examination at less than six hours of age. Participants will be randomized to receive either one dose of Darbepoetin, or placebo within 24 hours of birth. Neurodevelopmental testing (Bayley (III or IV) and Gross Motor Function Assessment) will be performed at 24 months of age. Pharmacokinetics will be assessed on those infants that received Darbe.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care for newborns diagnosed with moderate to severe neonatal encephalopathy (NE) presumably due to hypoxic ischemia. In order to be eligible for TH an infant must have perinatal acidemia and evidence of moderate or severe encephalopathy on a standardized neurologic examination (Sarnat). However, the majority of newborns with perinatal acidemia do not have a neurologic examination abnormal enough to be classified as moderate or severe NE. In a retrospective review, DuPont et al. found that as many as 20% of newborns with perinatal academia and mild NE have abnormal short-term outcomes such as seizures, death from progressive asphyxia insult, brain MRI findings consistent with NE, abnormal neurologic examination at discharge, gastrostomy tube feeding, or feeding difficulties. Preliminary data from a prospective trial investigating mild NE (PRIME study, NCT01747863) found that 39% had either abnormal electroencephalography at < 9h of age, an abnormal brain MRI finding, or abnormal neurological exam at discharge. Murray et al. recently reported on 5-year outcomes of infants with mild encephalopathy and showed that 25% had neurodevelopmental disability. These data suggest that mild NE likely carries a higher risk of impaired neurological outcome then reported previously. Thus it would appear that neuroprotective strategies would be beneficial in this group of infants. Preliminary data suggest that erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) provide neuroprotection, and improve short and long-term neurologic outcome in neonatal brain injury. ESA may work through several mechanisms including reduced inflammation, limited oxidative stress, decreased apoptosis and white matter injury, as well as via pro-angiogenic and neurogenic properties. Darbepoetin alfa (Darbe), a recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO)-derived molecule has established safety and pharmacokinetics in newborns. Because Darbe has an extended circulating half-life with comparable biological activity to EPO, it has the advantage of requiring less frequent administration

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
28

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Infants will be eligible for the MEND trial if they have a gestational age > 34 weeks by best obstetric estimate, are <24 hours old and have evidence of mild encephalopathy as defined by Shankaran et al based on a modified Sarnat examination performed at <6 hours of age.

  1. History of an acute perinatal event (abruption, cord prolapsed, severe fetal heart rate abnormality, or meconium staining)
  2. Infant is evaluated for hypothermia therapy and DOES NOT meet clinical criteria for TH.
  3. Infant has an IV for clinical treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Moderate/Severe encephalopathy on modified Sarnat examination at < 6 hours of age
  2. Major congenital and/or chromosomal abnormalities
  3. Prenatal diagnosis of brain abnormality or hydrocephalus
  4. Severe growth restriction (< 3%)
  5. Central venous hematocrit >65%, platelet count >600,000/dL, and/or neutropenia (ANC<500 μL)
  6. ECMO
  7. Infant judged critically ill and unlikely to benefit from neonatal intensive care by the attending neonatologist

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Darbepoetin Alpha
IV,10 mcg/kg/dose, Darbepoetin Alpha, one dose at <24 hours of age
Drug: Darbepoetin Alfa
Single dose of 10 mcg/kg Darbepoetin Alpha given IV at less than 24 hours of age
Other Names:
  • Darbe
  • Darbepoetin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
IV, Normal saline (placebo dose), one dose at <24 hours of age
Drug: Normal Saline
Single dose of normal saline, IV, given at less than 24 hours of age

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Normal Neurodevelopment
Time Frame: 9 - 12 months of age
The Bayley III and Neuromuscular Assessment were completed between 9-12 months of age. Subjects were abnormal if they had a Bayley III score of less than 70 and/or an abnormal neurological examination.
9 - 12 months of age

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent of Infants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: 30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first
Potential adverse events such as (but not limited to) alterations in blood pressure, secondary infections, neutropenia, thrombotic/vascular events, hematologic events (platelets, Hct level, polycythemia), and hepatic/renal function that are outside of normal range for the study population.
30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first
Percent of Infants With Seizures
Time Frame: 30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first
development of clinical or electrographic seizures
30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first
Percentage of Infants Who Need Gavage Feeds or Gastrostomy at Discharge Home
Time Frame: 30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first
Infants who require tube feedings at discharge
30 days or until hospital discharge whichever comes first

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent With Seizures
Time Frame: 24 months of age
development of clinical or electrographic seizures
24 months of age
Percent With Failure to Thrive
Time Frame: 9 months of age
Growth at <3%
9 months of age
Percent With Hearing Impairment
Time Frame: 9 months of age
Child requires a hearing device
9 months of age
Percent With Vision Impairment
Time Frame: 9 months of age
requires corrective lenses
9 months of age

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of New Mexico

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Utah

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tara L DuPont, MD, University of Utah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 1, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 1, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MEND 16-330

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings