Descriptive Study of the Evolution in Proportion of Regulatory B Lymphocytes in Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care for Severe Sepsis (DELyBREG)

April 10, 2017 updated by: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Severe sepsis and septic shock are the most severe forms of sepsis (which associates a systemic inflammatory response with infection). These are serious pathologies with a lethality estimated at almost 40% at 28 days (after the onset of sepsis).

After a first pro-inflammatory phase, a second compensatory phase called Compensatory Anti-Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CARS) takes place quickly. Patients then show signs of immunosuppression and profound alterations in immune functions. It is during this phase that the vast majority of deaths occur, far from the onset of the shock, which is related to the inability of the immune system to eliminate the initial infectious agent and / or a greater susceptibility Important to develop secondary infections (nosocomial infection, latent virus reactivation ...).

The CARS phase has been the subject of studies focusing on measuring the plasma concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as Interleukin (IL) -10), the percentage of regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg), Or the percentage of monocytic expression of HLA-DR in septic patients.

The investigator proposes to carry out the first study on a newly described regulatory lymphocytic subpopulation: regulatory B lymphocytes (Breg) from a quantitative and functional point of view in severe septic states.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Picardie
      • Amiens, Picardie, France, 80054
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Amiens Picardie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with severe sepsis or septic shock diagnosed less than 24 hours (defined as D0) and hospitalized in the medical resuscitation department of the Amiens-Picardie University Hospital.

  • The definitions of severe sepsis and septic shock are the result of the consensus of the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française dating from 2005:

    • Sepsis refers to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in the presence of suspected or identified infection. Sepsis is said to be severe when lactate> 4 mmol / L or arterial hypotension prior to filling or organ dysfunction is present (one is sufficient): hypoxemia with a PaO2 / FIO2 <300 ratio, renal failure with Hepatic insufficiency with INR> 4 or bilirubin> 78 μmol / l, thrombocytopenia (platelets <100 000 / mm3) and hepatic insufficiency> 176 μmol / l, coagulation disorders with INR> 1.5 Disorders of higher functions with a Glasgow Coma Score <13.
    • Finally, septic shock is defined as a severe sepsis condition with persistent hypotension despite a well-conducted vascular filling (20-40 ml / kg isotonic saline).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with active neoplasia, immune deficiency, autoimmune disease or autoimmune disease.
  • Patient under tutorship or curatorship
  • Taking an immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment at the time of the study or the year prior to hospitalization for sepsis.
  • Antecedent or haematopoietic graft in progress.
  • Pregnancy in progress.
  • Known history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 or 2 or with hepatitis B or C virus
  • Patient with agranulocytosis (defined as neutrophils <0.5 G / L).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Adult patients with severe sepsis
Other: Describe for the first time the kinetics of evolution in proportion of the circulating Brég in patients with severe septic state, at times D0, D2, D7 and D14 of hospitalization in medical reanimation.
Describe for the first time the kinetics of evolution in proportion of the circulating Brég in patients with severe septic state, at times D0, D2, D7 and D14 (or on leaving the service if before D14) of hospitalization in medical reanimation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Variation in the proportion of circulating Breg compared to total B lymphocytes in the included cohort of patients
Time Frame: 28 days
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 20, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 19, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 19, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PI2015_843_0028

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Sepsis

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings