Hepcidin: a Prognostic Marker of Morbidity and Mortality in Severe Sepsis? (HEP-SEPSIS)

September 26, 2018 updated by: Rennes University Hospital
Many biomarkers have been evaluated in sepsis, especially for prognostic purposes, but none has yet been shown to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity for routine use in clinical practice. However, highlighting a biomarker facilitating the evaluation of the severity of sepsis remains relevant in a pathology where survival is largely conditioned by the initiation of an early and adapted treatment. Recent evidence suggests that hepcidin, which is the key hormone for systemic regulation of iron metabolism, may be an interesting prognostic biomarker. The synthesis of this peptide is regulated by the iron stocks of the body, erythropoiesis, but also inflammation. The mechanisms inducing the expression of hepcidin during inflammation are multiple: interleukin-6 (IL-6) in particular, pro-inflammatory cytokine is a strong inducer of hepcidin. In addition, its expression is increased by the effect of lipopolysaccharide via Toll-like receptors . In septic patients, elevated levels of hepcidin or pro-hepcidin have been reported . A new role for hepcidin in the control of inflammatory and / or immune response has recently been reported. Thus, in a model of murine septic shock, the deleterious character of a lack of expression of hepcidin could be demonstrated . In humans, hepcidinemia has been shown to be a predictive factor in the development of immunotolerance in hepatic transplant patients. Hepcidin therefore plays a major role in the regulation of the inflammatory and / or immune response and in particular during sepsis. The investigators therefore hypothesize that hepcidin could be the marker of an adverse prognosis in septic patients expressing this

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Detailed Description

Many biomarkers have been evaluated in sepsis, especially for prognostic purposes, but none has yet been shown to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity for routine use in clinical practice. However, highlighting a biomarker facilitating the evaluation of the severity of sepsis remains relevant in a pathology where survival is largely conditioned by the initiation of an early and adapted treatment. Recent evidence suggests that hepcidin, which is the key hormone for systemic regulation of iron metabolism, may be an interesting prognostic biomarker. The synthesis of this peptide is regulated by the iron stocks of the body, erythropoiesis, but also inflammation. The mechanisms inducing the expression of hepcidin during inflammation are multiple: interleukin-6 (IL-6) in particular, pro-inflammatory cytokine is a strong inducer of hepcidin. In addition, its expression is increased by the effect of lipopolysaccharide via Toll-like receptors . In septic patients, elevated levels of hepcidin or pro-hepcidin have been reported . A new role for hepcidin in the control of inflammatory and / or immune response has recently been reported. Thus, in a model of murine septic shock, the deleterious character of a lack of expression of hepcidin could be demonstrated . In humans, hepcidinemia has been shown to be a predictive factor in the development of immunotolerance in hepatic transplant patients. Hepcidin therefore plays a major role in the regulation of the inflammatory and / or immune response and in particular during sepsis. The investigators therefore hypothesize that hepcidin could be the marker of an adverse prognosis in septic patients expressing this.

Primary endpoint is to evaluate the prognostic value of plasma hepcidin assayed on admission to intensive care on mortality at D28 in severe sepsis.

Sensitivity of plasma hepcidin assayed at admission to intensive care on mortality at D28 in patients with severe sepsis.

In a first step, a search for the hepcidin threshold value with the best sensitivity and specificity to predict death on D28 will be performed using a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. This threshold value will be used to evaluate the primary endpoint and also determine specificity and positive and negative predictive values.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Man or woman, older than or equal to 18 years, with severe sepsis or septic shock according to the criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians / Society of Critical Care Medicine (ACCP / SCCM),

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • man or woman,
  • older than or equal to 18 years, in severe sepsis or septic shock according to the criteria of the American College of Chest Physicians / Society of Critical Care Medicine (ACCP / SCCM),
  • no opposition from the patient, a relative or the legal representative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or lactating woman,
  • patient with hemochromatosis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of plasma hepcidin assayed at admission to intensive care on mortality at D28 in patients with severe sepsis.
Time Frame: day 28
Sensitivity of plasma hepcidin assayed at admission to intensive care on mortality at D28 in patients with severe sepsis.
day 28

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mortality at day 90
Time Frame: day 90
mortality at day 90
day 90
occurrence of care-related infections as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention during hospitalization
Time Frame: day 90
occurrence of care-related infections as defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention during hospitalization
day 90
occurrence of new organ failure (SOFA) or the aggravation of an existing organ failure on seventh day of sepsis
Time Frame: day 90
occurrence of new organ failure (SOFA) or the aggravation of an existing organ failure on seventh day of sepsis
day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 12, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 35RC13_9906_HEP-SEPSIS

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock

Clinical Trials on blood diagnostic tests

3
Subscribe