Comparison Between Asymmetric And Standard Split-Dose Regimen For Bowel Preparation

May 8, 2017 updated by: gianpiero manes, ASST Rhodense

Comparison Between Asymmetric (Low Dose In The Morning) And Standard Split-Dose Regimen Of Polyethylene Glycol Plus Bisacodyl For Bowel Preparation For Screening And Surveillance Colonoscopy: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial.

We aimed to compare the efficacy for bowel cleansing of a split-dose regimen with a low morning dose of PEG solution (Asymmetric; 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure and 75% of the dose is given on the day before) with the standard split-dose regimen in patients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy using a low volume bowel preparation (2L PEG-citrate-simethicone plus Bisacodyl). We enrolled consecutive outpatients undergoing screening and surveillance colonoscopy in a randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to: group A, asymmetric split dose regimen (1,5 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 0,5 L 4 hours before colonoscopy); group B, symmetric split dose regimen (1 L of PEG + bisacodyl the day before and 1 L 5 hours before colonoscopy). Primary endpoint was the proportion of adequate bowel cleansing. Moreover, all patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire assessing compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial in adult patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Eligible participants were randomly assigned, according to a computer-generated list with an allocation ratio of 1:1, to receive either asymmetric or symmetric split-dose regimen of a low-volume preparation by investigators who were not involved in the enrolment process. Detailed written instructions were administered to all patients who accepted to participate. A low-fiber diet was prescribed three day before colonoscopy; participants in both groups were instructed to have a light lunch on the day before the colonoscopy and only clear liquid were allowed on the day of the exam. All endoscopic procedures were scheduled between 9:00 AM and 1:00 PM.

The preparation used in the study is a combination of a 2 L sulphate-free iso-osmotic formulation of of PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Lovol-esse; AlfaWassermann, Bologna, Italy. Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG, to be dissolved in 2 L of water.), and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets (Lovodyl; Alfa-Wassermann, Bologna, Italy).

All subjects were instructed to take 4 bisacodyl tablets at 4:00 PM on the day before the procedure. Subjects allocated to the asymmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 3 sachets of PEG-CS in 1,5 L of water in a range from 90 to 120 minutes (about 250 mL every 15 min) and 4 hours before the scheduled procedure 1 sachets in 0,5 L of water in a range from 15 to 30 minutes. Subjects allocated to the symmetric split-dose regimen group were invited to consume at 6:00 PM on the evening before the colonoscopy 2 sachets of PEG-CS in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes and 5 hours before the scheduled procedure 2 sachets in 1 L of water in a range from 60 to 90 minutes.

Unblinded investigators collected demographic and clinical data with medical history. All patients filled in a nurse-administered questionnaire to assess compliance, tolerability and safety of bowel preparation.

Blinded experencied endoscopists performed endoscopic procedure in accordance with colonoscopy quality practice. Data on bowel cleansing (evaluated by using Boston Bowel Preparation Scale), endoscopic procedures and findings (i.e. cancer, polyps, diverticula) were collected.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
81

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
    • Lombardia
      • Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardia, Italy, 20020
        • ASST Rhodense

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients scheduled as outpatient for screening or surveillance colonoscopy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inpatients
  • refusal of split dose regimen for bowel preparation
  • previous history of colorectal resection
  • severe cardiac disease
  • advanced (stage IV and V) chronic kidney disease
  • pregnancy; ileus
  • suspected bowel obstruction or toxic megacolon
  • known inflammatory bowel disease
  • known or suspected allergy to PEG.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Asymmetric split dose preparation
75% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 25% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Drug: PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl
PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets
Active Comparator: Symmetric split dose preparation
50% of the dose is given on the day before of the procedure and 50% of the dose is given on the day of the procedure
Drug: PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl
PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) (Kit contains 4 pouches, each containing 64.5gr of PEG) and bisacodyl 5 mg tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of bowel prepreparation
Time Frame: 2 days
Quality of bowel prepreparation/cleanliness scored using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Each segment of the colon received a score from 0 to 3, and these segment scores were summed for a total BBPS score ranging from 0 to 9. The preparation was considered adequate when BBPS score was ≥ 6 with a score with at least 2 points in any segment
2 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adenoma detection rate
Time Frame: 2 days
rate of patients with at least one adenoma
2 days
Rate of the occurrence of adverse events
Time Frame: 2 days
Rate of the occurrence of adverse events (bad taste in mouth, gastric fullness, nausea or vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain, headache)
2 days
Compliance
Time Frame: 2 days
Compliance was assessed by the amount of intake of study agents using a 3-point scale: 1 (100% intake), 2 (≥ 75% intake), and 3 (< 75% intake).
2 days
Tolerability
Time Frame: 2 days
Tolerability was evaluated assessing how patient finds tolerable the bowel preparation by using a 4-point scale: 1 (Easy), 2 (Acceptable), 3 (Somewhat difficult), 4 (Very difficult).
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
ASST Rhodense

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Gianpiero Manes, ASST Rhodense, Garbagnate Milanese, Lombardia, Italy, 20020

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 5, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 165-032017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Polyps

Clinical Trials on PEG-4000 added with citrates and simethicone (PEG-CS) plus Bisacodyl

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings