Evaluation of Patients Satisfaction of Attachment Retained Versus Clasp Retained Obturators in Unilateral Total Maxillectomy

May 9, 2017 updated by: Sharaf Mohamed Yahia, Cairo University
OBJECTIVE to evaluate patients satisfaction of obturator with attachment versus conventional obturator in treatment of unilateral maxillectomy .

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Fourteen patients were selected according to the following criteria : patients having sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \or class IV Aramany classification)not less than five teeth, intact soft palate , sufficient mouth opening , not exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy. Patients were divided into two equal groups, each of seven patients: patients of group I(Comparator) received a clasp retained obturator, while patients of group II(Intervention) received an attachment-retained obturator (RCT). The design of the definitive obturator for group I included double Aker's clasp on the first , second premolars and molars with alternating buccal and lingual retention, palatal plate as a major connector and a meshwork extension at the defect side. For group II, crown preparation of all the remaining abutments was done. Then, in the wax pattern, a lingual guiding plane was prepared and two OT Vertical attachments were attached mesial to the most anterior abutment and palatal to the second premolar and first molar . Construction of the splinted crowns were completed and the final impression was made with the splinted crowns in place to be picked up into the impression. After final try-in of the obturator, construction of the definitive obturator was completed with a hard resin hollowed obturator bulb, functional relining with soft silicone liner for both groups.

Evaluation included patient satisfaction (primary outcome)where Two scales were followed in this study which are"The Obturator Functioning Scale" and " The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35"

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11599
        • Mohamed yahia Sharaf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. - patients with sufficient number of natural teeth(class I and \or class IV Aramany classification),
  2. - intact soft palate, 3- the mouth opening is not less than 25 mm .

Exclusion Criteria:

1- patients are exposed to radiotherapy or chemotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: attachment
attachment retained obturator
obturator which retained by attachment
Other Names:
  • obturator with attachment
Active Comparator: clasp
clasp retained obturator
obturator which retained by clasp
Other Names:
  • obturator with clasp

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaires"The Obturator Functioning Scale"
1 month
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month
questionnaires " The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck 35"
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201512

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tumour

Clinical Trials on attachment retained obturator

Search Similar Trials