C-arm Computed Tomography Scan Image Quality in Patients With Neurovascular Diseases

October 15, 2018 updated by: Vitor Pereira, University Health Network, Toronto

C-arm Computed Tomography Scan Image Quality in Patients With Neurovascular Diseases: Observational Study

With new developments that have taken place in the optimization of C-arm computed tomography (CACT) image acquisition and reconstruction, CACT image quality will be better than current standard-of-care CACT scan techniques used for neurovascular patients referred to endovascular treatment or diagnosis. As such, novel acquisition, filtration, artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques will be evaluated against the standard-of-care CACT approach.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This prospective observational study aims to enroll 50 patients diagnosed with various neurovascular conditions with the goal to compare the image quality of new types of head C-arm computed tomography (CACT) image scans with standard CACT scans, and also to compare these novel scans with standard CT scan image quality. These new scans use novel acquisition, filtration and reconstruction techniques compared to the standard-of-care CACT scans being used in the neuroangiography suite at the present time. Patient selection will be based on a suitability of patients for neuro-endovascular interventions in the neuroangiography suite. All research related activities will be done by study team members. The study patients are expected to follow their routine treatment schedule with the exception of 1 extra CACT scan while patient is receiving their standard treatment.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
        • Recruiting
        • Toronto Western Hospital - University Health Network
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with neurovascular diseases and conditions that are amenable to endovascular treatment in the neuro-angiography suite.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is suitable for an endovascular treatment in the neuro-angiography suite.
  2. Subject or subject's legally authorized representative has signed an institutionally approved research informed consent form.
  3. Subject ≥ 18 years old.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject or subject's legally authorized representative is unable or unwilling to consent to the study.
  2. Subject had prior significant or severe allergy to intra-arterial contrast medium uncontrolled by pre-procedure medications.
  3. Subject with documented contrast injection contraindication due to severe kidney disease or allergy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Neurovascular
Patients to receive percutaneous neurovascular intervention
Patient will receive one extra CACT scan while they are receiving percutaneous neurovascular intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with improved new CACT image quality compared to standard CACT based on a 5-point Likert scale
Time Frame: 1 year
To achieve a brain parenchyma image quality with CACT using novel acquisition, filtration, artifact reduction and reconstruction techniques that is better than current standard-of-care CACT approaches, based on a 5-point Likert scoring scale questionnaire for each patient.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with a CACT image quality at the same level or better as standard CT based on a 5-point Likert scale
Time Frame: 1 year
Achieve CACT image quality equivalent to or better than standard CT scans (if available) in patients with neurovascular diseases or conditions. This comparison will be done based on a 5-point Likert scoring scale questionnaire for each patient.
1 year
Number of participants with improved or equivalent contrast-to-noise ratio using new CACT vs. standard CT scans
Time Frame: 1 year
Contrast-to-noise ratio (unitless quantity) equivalent or higher in new CACT images compared to standard CT images, measured using regions of interest in image processing software.
1 year
Number of participants with improved contrast-to-noise ratio using new CACT vs. standard CACT
Time Frame: 1 year
Contrast-to-noise ratio (unitless quantity) higher in new CACT images compared to standard CACT images, measured using regions of interest in image processing software.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vitor Pereira, MD, Associate Professor of Radiology and Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TWH-Version 2.0 Sept 28 2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endovascular Procedures

Clinical Trials on Neurovascular percutaneous intervention

Search Similar Trials