Schnederian Membrane Elevation and Augmentation With Deproteinized Bovine Bone [Tutu-gen Bone] Versus Graft Less Tenting Technique With Simultaneous Implant Placement

June 1, 2017 updated by: Waleed Fouad Mahmoud, Cairo University

Schnederian Membrane Elevation and Augmentation With Deproteinized Bovine Bone [Tutu-gen Bone] Versus Graft Less Tenting Technique With Simultaneous Implant Placement: Randomized Clinical Trial

30 recruited patients indicated for sinus membrane elevation with simultaneous implant placement. patients are divided into 2 groups each group contain 15 patients, one group assigned for placement of bovine bone graft after membrane elevation and insertion of the implants while the other group assigned for graft-less tenting technique after membrane elevation and insertion of the implant.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

On the 2 groups a mucoperiosteal flap is elvated then a lateral wondow is created then sinus membrane is elevated then the implants are placed, in the control group deproteinized bovine bone graft substitute is placed in the sinus for augmentation while in the study group no bone graft is added inside the sinus( graftless tenting technique)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with atrophic maxilla and pneumatization of the maxillary sinus with residual bone height at least 5mm as per MISCH criteria.
  • both sexes.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • sinus pathology
  • heavy smokers(more than 20 cigarettes per day.
  • patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: sinus lift,implant placement,tenting
elevation of the sinus membrane with simultaneous implant placement without the use of any bone graft material(tenting technique)
elevation of the sinus membrane then insertion of the implants without any bone graft material( graft-less) for augmentation
Active Comparator: sinus lift,implant placement,bovine bone
elevation of the sinus membrane with simultaneous implant placement together with deproteinized bovine bone graft substitute for augmentation
sinus membrane elevation then placement of the implants together with deproteinized bovine bone substitute as a graft material for augmentation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 7 days post operative
evaluation of post operative complications in terms of pain and edema using patient pain chart
7 days post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
implant stability
Time Frame: will be measured intraoperatively immediately after insertion of the implants and will be measure one more time 6 months after the 1st operation at the time of exposure of the implants
measurement of the implant stability using the osstell device
will be measured intraoperatively immediately after insertion of the implants and will be measure one more time 6 months after the 1st operation at the time of exposure of the implants
height of bone gained or lost around the implants
Time Frame: 6 months postoperative
two cone beam computed tomography(CBCT) will be taken for the patient, one immediate postoperative and the other 6 months after the operation then the height of bone gained or lost around the implants will be assessed by superimposing the same section in the two CBCTS.
6 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2017

Last Verified

June 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • cebc.cu

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Maxillary Sinus Floor Elevation

Clinical Trials on sinus lift,implant placement,tenting

Search Similar Trials