Ultrasound Assessment of the Anatomic Landmarks for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients With Hip Fracture

April 2, 2018 updated by: Jin-Young Hwang, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center
Investigators assess the anatomic landmarks for spinal anesthesia in patients with hip fracture using ultrasonography.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Investigators evaluate the anatomic landmarks using Tuffier's line and the tenth rib line for spinal anesthesia in patients with hip fracture, and then assess the consistency of the landmarks-guided interspinous levels with the actual interspinous level using ultrasonography.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 156-707
        • Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled for hip fracture surgery under spinal anesthesia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anatomic abnormalities or masses in the spine
  • History of spinal surgery of compression fracture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
In the lateral decubitus position, an investigator evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using an anatomic landmark (Tuffier's line), and then evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using another anatomic landmark (Tenth rib line). Another investigator evaluate the actual L4-5 interspinous level by noninvasive ultrasonography.
An investigator evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using anatomic landmarks in turn, then another independent investigator assess the consistency of the landmarks-guided interspinous level with the actual one by noninvasive ultrasound assessment.
Experimental: Group 2
In the lateral decubitus position, an investigator evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using an anatomic landmark (Tenth rib line), and then evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using another anatomic landmark (Tuffier's line). Another investigator evaluate the actual L4-5 interspinous level by noninvasive ultrasonography.
An investigator evaluate the L4-5 interspinous level using anatomic landmarks in turn, then another independent investigator assess the consistency of the landmarks-guided interspinous level with the actual one by noninvasive ultrasound assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of each anatomic landmark (Tuffier's line and tenth rib line).
Time Frame: Baseline
Actual interspinous levels of the landmark-guided approches (Tuffier's line and tenth rib line) are assessed using ultrasonography.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The estimation ratio related to the intervertebral levels
Time Frame: Baseline
Actual interspinous levels of the landmark-guided approches (Tuffier's line and tenth rib line) are assessed using ultrasonography.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jin-Young Hwang, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-2017-46

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Noninvasive ultrasound assessment

Search Similar Trials